Jump to content
Why become a member? Ɨ

Recommended Posts

Posted

That's pretty cool - shame about the lack of finish options, but I guess that may change if they become popular.

Ā 

Here's my old one anyway, owned in 2013:

Ā 

image.thumb.png.1e90baaa7a77331a21b3672d17ff5039.png

Posted

I don’t like them 😳

Ā 

I’ve played a couple over the years, and thought they were uncomfortable and not that great sounding? I don’t know why they’re getting so expensive? We didn’t rate them back in the day.

Ā 

Ā 

  • Like 1
Posted

Last time a tried one was maybe 10yrs ago…. Myself and a handful of mates (members here) used to have a mini bash up int’ north. One of the guys had one….. I remember being underwhelmed by the tone, surprising really as it’s covered in knobs (there was one extra one the day I had my hands on it).

Ā 

Ā I don’t know, it’s horses for courses isn’t it….. I know people love them, but I’m not one of them.

Posted

Miss them? Nah, still have 2 and lots of parts.

Ā 

I've seen a couple converted to 5s and I might do that later my making a new bridge and neck once I get the CNC dialled in.

Ā 

The Retrovibe is sort of cool, but unless it has the same pickup construction, and it clearly doesn't, I don't seeĀ  how it would sound similar. Plus no ash body and I loathe bursts. I still wish him best of luck with the venture.

  • Like 2
Posted

I'd take a 5 string over another Fender copy, I'm not much of a retro guy but that looks quite smart.

Ā 

They're obviously not in the vintage replica business and more power to them.

  • Like 2
Posted

I've always liked T-40s, but not really so much as to pull the trigger on one.Ā  I think this is something to do with seeing Ross Valory/Journey using one.

Ā 

If I were on the market for one, I'd sooner go the whole hog and buy the real thing (there's a nice black one on Reverb for £1.2K) rather than chucking £500.00 on a Retrovibe, that'll be worth half that if you want to resell it. 

Ā 

Ā 

  • Like 1
Posted

I really want to like this but, as with most Retrovibes, I feel that they make a good attempt but usually fall too far short in either looks or specs...

  • Like 1
Posted

If I remember right... Years ago when I first started reading bass forums over dial up internet I used to read the bassist section of Harmony Central. The Peavey T40 was a bit of a joke amongst people there, giving each other a friendly ribbing about playing one and it being a crappy bass but there were some who were loving them and collecting them. I think at the time they were going for peanuts on eBay over here. Now they're over a grand.

Posted
6 hours ago, Waddo Soqable said:

People seem to like them sound wise, I can't give an opinion as I've never tried one..

The thing that always put me off was that to me they're pig ugly looking.Ā 

I think they are super cool looking.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, NancyJohnson said:

Ā  I think this is something to do with seeing Ross Valory/Journey using one.

Many make that connection but delve no deeper than the T-40/Vallory advert.

Ā 

Journey got a backline/PA deal from Peavey, part of the deal was Ross play a T-40. Apart from the live album made on that tour, no Journey tracks feature a T-40.

Ā 

I've owned a few, mainly for masochistic reasons since TBH I don't think they play or sound that greatĀ šŸ˜„Ā The 'secret sounds' thing is mostly bollocks, suggestion more than substance.

Ā 

6 hours ago, crazycloud said:

I've seen a couple converted to 5s and I might do that later my making a new bridge and neck once I get the CNC dialled in.

You'll likely need to make new pickups too, the blades don't lend themselves to wider string spacing. From memory the steel used was 63mm long.Ā 

Ā 

I kept the original neck for my 5 string conversion, not a wide neck to begin with. Think I got 15.6mm

Posted
3 hours ago, kodiakblair said:

The 'secret sounds' thing is mostly bollocks, suggestion more than substance.

Ā 

Just like most of the florid text we spout when describing the virtues of whichever new bass flame has been taken home ;)

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Paolo85 said:

Does anybody know if the bridge pickup is in proper Musicman position?

On the T-40 it was 3/4" closer the bridge than on a Stingray.

Ā 

Passive tone pot vs Stingray active EQ is another thing entirelyĀ šŸ‘

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

It doesn't really look much like a T-40 IMO, more just a P copy body with MM pickups slapped in there. In fact the more I look at it the less like a T-40 it gets!

Edited by lemmywinks
  • Like 3
Posted

Have to agree with others. Looks a little bit like a t40. But vastly different specs to make it actually sound like one.Ā 

Ā 

If they had copied the original pickups and put them in the exact locations. With the same copied electrical circuit. That would have been cool!Ā 

Posted
16 hours ago, Machines said:

That's pretty cool - shame about the lack of finish options, but I guess that may change if they become popular.

Ā 

Here's my old one anyway, owned in 2013:

Ā 

image.thumb.png.1e90baaa7a77331a21b3672d17ff5039.png

I keep coming back to this post and marvelling at that bridge.

It has to be the biggest bass bridge I think I've ever seen!

Is there a 5-string version?!?

Ā 

Mark

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
Ɨ
Ɨ
  • Create New...