Jump to content
Why become a member? ×
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Recreating that Motown sound.


Maude

Recommended Posts

I've just watched this on YouTube and thought I'd share. 

Really quite interesting and some useful information, but mainly just enjoyable and the sound they got in the end was almost bang on, if being critical it still sounded too clear and modern/hi-fi but maybe that's just unavoidable with today's digital way of recording and consuming music, computers rather than tape/vinyl. 

🙂

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 51m0n said:

It's not the digital aspect at all, that's a huge myth.

Yeah I've no real idea, I'm not that up on the engineering side of things, which is probably why I found the clip interesting. I do know though that if I play the same bass through the same preamp into my old Yamaha MT8X and my almost as old Fostex DMT8, the cassette doesn't sound as clean a reproduction as the digital. Surely that's the result of digital over cassette. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok so cassette is not reel to reel for one thing. The noise floor on reel to reel is way way way lower than cassette.

Tape compression and saturation is a huge part of the sound of vintage recording techniques.

I can't stress that enough. People didn't have millions of plugins. They didn't even have dozens of pieces of outboard gear. Even Motown. They built what they needed themselves. Including the DI that Jameson used to get his bass down, yep Motown bass was DI'ed!

But they did have tape, which as you start to drive it saturates really nicely and compresses too.

But these days you can get lovely tape compression/saturation emulation on all channels.

 

It's more the room and players IMO. Watch Standing In The Shadow of Motown.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 51m0n said:

Ok so cassette is not reel to reel for one thing. The noise floor on reel to reel is way way way lower than cassette.

Tape compression and saturation is a huge part of the sound of vintage recording techniques.

I can't stress that enough. People didn't have millions of plugins. They didn't even have dozens of pieces of outboard gear. Even Motown. They built what they needed themselves. Including the DI that Jameson used to get his bass down, yep Motown bass was DI'ed!

But they did have tape, which as you start to drive it saturates really nicely and compresses too.

But these days you can get lovely tape compression/saturation emulation on all channels.

 

It's more the room and players IMO. Watch Standing In The Shadow of Motown.

Absolutely, and SITSOM is essential viewing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I'm going to be crude, but those guys at Motown had ears which is something that seems to be disappearing in this digital world. If you've got some (ears), you can get that Motown sound without any problem even with totally digital gear.

Do we have to start that compressor and digital versus analogic war again ? :dash1:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting video. Much cleaner than the original recordings. Also interesting that Motown high passed the tracks at 70hz.

They had world class songs and singers, but boil it all down, what really makes Motown sound like Motown? IMO it starts and ends with James Jamerson's bass playing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What struck me was how 'simple' / easy/uncomplicated it all was

(aside from the actual studio clockwork of course).

At the end of the day, the Funk Brothers were Motown, and Motown was the Funk Brothers.........

If you've not watched Standing in the Shadows of Motown, just do it (please!)

😎

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Doctor J said:

Bob Babbitt on line two for you...

The Funk Brothers put in thousands of hours playing together, in the studio and on gigs. They supported Jamerson with his complex "issues" and when his confidence and ego reached a tipping point he burst out with his world shattering bass lines. Bob Babbitt was very good, Midnight Train To Georgia has a great bass tone,  but take Babbitt away and you still have Motown, take Jamerson away and you just have another, albeit very good, recording label. Without Jamerson we'd just be taking about the songs and the singers, not the label.

Babbitt, David Hood, Tommy Cogbill, Mike Leech, Duck Dunn, Carol Kaye are the cream of studio bass players but none of them changed bass playing. James Jamerson did, and made it look easy.

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, scalpy said:

Quality material as well- the most important and over looked ingredient.

Exactly this, if the songs weren't any good we wouldn't be discussing the musicians today. 

It was just one of those things when all the right ingredients were in the  bowl at the same time. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, chris_b said:

Interesting video. Much cleaner than the original recordings. Also interesting that Motown high passed the tracks at 70hz.

We do something similar, but at a round 30/35hz. It really makes a difference, and we don`t use a lot of low-end in the first place. Maybe without doing it at 70 the Motown recordings - due to the amount going on - sounded muddy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, taunton-hobbit said:

A forthright article, pulling no punches. Sadly Gordy's business style wasn't unique. He was only one of many business men and managers in the music business who was seriously ripping off the artists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lozz196 said:

We do something similar, but at a round 30/35hz. It really makes a difference, and we don`t use a lot of low-end in the first place. Maybe without doing it at 70 the Motown recordings - due to the amount going on - sounded muddy?

They were in a loudness war with the Beatles. Loudest single sounded the best on a jukebox.

An HPF meant you could cut louder without the bass popping the needle out of the groove....

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Doctor J said:

Bob Babbitt on line two for you...

Much as I love Jamerson's bass playing, Signed, Sealed Delivered and Inner City Blues remain two of my favourite songs and both have Bob Babbitt on bass.  

From a UK perspective, volume wars on singles on juke boxes would have featured few Motown singles (probably half a dozen) until the very late 60s - the Beatles possibly had that many singles in the charts at the same time in the early 60s. They were in competition with bands like the Hollies, Herman's Hermits and other acts like Lulu and Tom Jones.

Motown was very obviously important but let's get things in perspective. We all noticed the bass playing (even though it wasn't very audible to us at the time). 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Motown was in a loudness war with the Beatles in the US matey.

 

There is documented evidence that they could not get their releases as loud as the Beatles' 7" singles in an article by their mastering engineer at the time. Search for Bob Ohlsson on Gearsluts IIRC...

Edited by 51m0n
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...