thinman Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Probably been asked already but I was reading an interview with Paul Turner (rather excellent Jamiroquai bassist) and he said that he didn't like 5 strings because he thought the tone of the E wasn't as good as on a 4-string. Is that a widely held view? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icastle Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 [quote name='thinman' timestamp='1336677241' post='1649453'] Is that a widely held view? [/quote] Never heard that one before, so no. The only way I can see a low B interfering with an E in any way would be down to poor technique rather than any inherant design flaw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dood Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Paul Turner is a great guy and awesome bass player, but I have to say - unless it has been quoted out of context (I mean I'm sure there is more to his point than that?) I'd have to disagree. In terms of say a bass having pickups or electronics that might favour a B string rather than an E (I.e. the centre frequency of the bass boost, for example) then maybe that would be the case. I'd expect any quality 5 string bass to have a good strong response across all the strings in comparison to an equivalent 4 string. Certainly my pair of Shukers and a new six string I have picked up have a brilliant balance in tone and volume of each of the strings. I'd like to hear more about what he meant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris2112 Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Personally, no, I've never found that to be true other than when the pickups are in need a balance! Now, if he was saying 'I find that some Musicman basses have really loud E and A strings and quiet/flat D and G stings' then I'd be agreeing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leschirons Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 I use 6 and 5 stringers most of the time and have noticed no difference at all. E strings sounds fine. Can't really see what Mr Turner is getting at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dood Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Do we know what interview this was? If not, then I'll ask him in a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottomE Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Maybe he meant playing the E on the low B of a 5 string compared to the open E on a 4 string? Just trying to rationalise a comment that is probably out of context... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skej21 Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 I have to say, from a construction point of view, I would disagree that an E string on a 5/6 string isnt as good as on a 4 string. However, personally, I do find that I use the E string differently when playing a 5/6 string than a 4. I feel I can dig in and be more aggressive with a 4 string and tend to be more 'technical'on a 5/6 string due to the setting I tend to use it in (mainly reading gigs). If this is what Mr Turner was getting at, then I would agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heminder Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 when playing a 5-string E, there will be some sympathetic resonance of the B string (as with all the other strings) hence some of the energy of the ringing E string lost to the B. it's not anything significantly audible though so just play however many strings you want and be happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland Rock Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 But he still plays 5 strings? I've seen him with a Fodera NYC Empire 5 and a white Stingray 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRedX Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 IME quite the opposite. A 5-string bass that is capable of a decent B has a phenomenal E string. Maybe he's just be playing crap 5 string basses? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_b Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 If Paul Turner said that then I don’t disbelieve him. He’s hearing something I can't, but then he does work in a very more focused world of sound than I do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LukeFRC Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 I for the life of me can't think what difference it would made, unless a very thin neck as fundamental to the sound somehow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geoffbassist Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Could it be down to the extra tension? I've never noticed it. I always play 5ers but do love it when I get a chance to play a 4. They sometimes seem easier play than a 5er, but I've not heard any change in sound on my e. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrkelly Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 (edited) I know exactly what he means. If you've really played on a truly incredible vintage Fender 4 string you'll know. I can't describe the physics, on a 5 it somehow compresses & evens out the sound. It takes that extra special something away from the money zone on the E and spreads it over the bottom 2 strings. That extra mass in the neck must have something to do with it. I've noticed this with all the best 5's I've owned (MTD 535, Stingray & my current main bass, a Celinder update). It's particularly evident with double basses, I've never played a 5 string with a good E. The 4 string with C extension rules in that area. I'm not saying there aren't exceptions to this but it seems to be a general trend. Will it stop me playing 5's? No. Edited May 10, 2012 by chrkelly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BassTractor Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 (edited) Indeed he probably means the E string on both. Now I wouldn't know, but someone I know says the very same. For decades, this guy has worked as producer and studio technician for Nile Rodgers besides playing guitar, bass and keyboards. He has worked with people like Jimmy and Stevie Ray Vaughan, David Bowie, Diana Ross, The B52's and lotsa others, so at the very least, he's not a noob. He says you'll never get the same great tones from the E string on a 5 string bass as from the E string on a 4 string bass, and he's very specific and firm about that. I trust him in this for several reasons. My guess is that neck and joint stiffness, or lack thereof, as well as sympathetic resonance issues, would be likely causes. best, bert Edited May 11, 2012 by BassTractor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigsmokebass Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 You'd think from a guy who plays Alleva Coppolo basses and Musicman 5 strings, he wouldn't be dissing sound quality from some of the top basses out there. being a keen 5 string player for a good 5 years, i've never experienced this problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Hah, I knewd it all along. Five strings pah, I'll sh*t 'em. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_b Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 [quote name='BassTractor' timestamp='1336695702' post='1649780'] ....someone I know says the very same.... He says you'll never get the same great tones from the E string on a 5 string bass as from the E string on a 4 string bass.... [/quote] There was an article on Will Lee a few years ago and he mentioned the NYC session guys never use 5 string basses in the studio because the producers think that the articulation and focus isn't as good on the 5 string. The studio environment has developed to a crazy level of detail. Such minute details don't exist in my world so give me a good thumping 5 string and I'm as happy as Larry! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LukeFRC Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 [quote name='chrkelly' timestamp='1336691931' post='1649747'] I know exactly what he means. If you've really played on a truly incredible vintage Fender 4 string you'll know. I can't describe the physics, on a 5 it somehow compresses & evens out the sound. It takes that extra special something away from the money zone on the E and spreads it over the bottom 2 strings. That extra mass in the neck must have something to do with it. I've noticed this with all the best 5's I've owned (MTD 535, Stingray & my current main bass, a Celinder update). It's particularly evident with double basses, I've never played a 5 string with a good E. The 4 string with C extension rules in that area. I'm not saying there aren't exceptions to this but it seems to be a general trend. Will it stop me playing 5's? No. [/quote] interesting. Now you say it, and without your experience I kinda know what you are talking about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jazzyvee Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Let Aston Barrett throw some words of his experience into the conversation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=9erbL9j3v5M#t=55s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost_Bass Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 IMO, the thing here is that people are comparing the E string from a 4 string passive bass to a 5 string active one (vintage fender 4 stringers vs most 5's wich are active) so i'm thinking it will be a mather of personal taste and tone of the instrument and not interaction of the low B... Has anyone compared the exact same model of bass with the same electronics on it's 4 and 5 string version and can confirm this rumour? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmo Valdemar Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 One of the main reasons I don't play 5 strings is because the E never feels right. I don't know why this is, I may be imagining it, but it's something that's always irritated me. FWIW, I don't think Mr Turner was being critical of his instruments themselves, more of the actual nature of the 5 string itself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twigman Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 [quote name='Chris2112' timestamp='1336678408' post='1649483'] Now, if he was saying 'I find that some Musicman basses have really loud E and A strings and quiet/flat D and G stings' then I'd be agreeing. [/quote] Same would be true of Fenders IMHE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XB26354 Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 I've had plenty of 5 and 6 strings I'm my time and I can't hear it. I reckon most of the time it's that there's no fat string sitting there below the E on a 4, so you can give it more of a go without risk of the open B string ringing or getting in the way. The passive/active thing is true too - how many truly passive fives are there anyway? I briefly had a passive American Standard P 5 with a maple board and the E sounded exactly the same as a four string to my ears, pick, slap, finger style just like an aggressive P bass should sound. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.