Boodang Posted Thursday at 13:34 Posted Thursday at 13:34 3 hours ago, Terry M. said: That's hilarious 😂 It's not my area to convince you otherwise so of course just play what makes you happy 👍 Actually, that's just given me an idea, next time I'm asked to play in the low B territory I'll just plug in to a fart pedal... nobody would notice the difference, might even be an improvement on my usual playing! Quote
ProjeKtWEREWOLF Posted Thursday at 14:38 Posted Thursday at 14:38 1 hour ago, Leonard Smalls said: Of course! Never liked crowds... Always waiting....the interminable waiting. Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted Thursday at 15:04 Posted Thursday at 15:04 4 hours ago, Woodinblack said: Not in an irrational predjudices thread it isn't! I don't think he's read the thread title 😁 1 Quote
Terry M. Posted Thursday at 15:11 Posted Thursday at 15:11 7 minutes ago, Stub Mandrel said: I don't think he's read the thread title 😁 This thread has a title? Stupid me eh? Quote
tauzero Posted Thursday at 15:25 Posted Thursday at 15:25 19 hours ago, razor5cl said: I'd consider it for practice or in the studio but on stage I have an irrational (heh see!) fear of using pedals during a performance. I'm just paranoid that cables will get tangled or me or someone else will step on it by accident or unplug it. My tuner and distortion pedals live in front of the amp at the back of the stage and I strictly forbid any of my band mates from going anywhere near them lol If you have an irrational fear of cables, go wireless. Quote
tauzero Posted Thursday at 15:35 Posted Thursday at 15:35 19 hours ago, razor5cl said: Someone here mentioned separate volume knobs and it's currently driving me mildly loopy. Just had the electronics swapped on my Jackson Kelly and I have two active EMGs with no preamp so separate pots it is. How does one deal with this? Having played for almost 9 years now and gotten used to having a master volume to quickly mute/unmute my bass with. I can quickly turn both down easily enough but turning them both back up is a faff. It's especially annoying since one of my band's tunes has a part where I do a volume swell up on a big power chord. So far I've been doing it with just one knob and then turning the other one up once it's already ringing out at full volume but sometimes I forget to turn up the other knob (like on stage this weekend oops!) You should consider yourself lucky. My Ibanez SRF705 has three volume controls, one for neck, one for bridge, and one for piezo bridge. They put a blend on the Ashula 2, would it really have hurt them to put one on the Portamento too? One day I will get round to wiring in the blend pot I have sitting on my desk, if I don't lose it first... Quote
bnt Posted Thursday at 16:38 Posted Thursday at 16:38 (edited) I do not like to see f-holes. They just bug me. They are just about acceptable in their original context: violin, viola, cello and double bass - though I don’t think they look right on the double bass. Put them on any other instrument and I am out. Yes, I’m looking at you, Ampeg and Paul Gilbert. Edited Thursday at 16:39 by bnt 1 Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted Thursday at 16:48 Posted Thursday at 16:48 7 minutes ago, bnt said: I do not like to see f-holes. They just bug me. They are just about acceptable in their original context: violin, viola, cello and double bass - though I don’t think they look right on the double bass. Put them on any other instrument and I am out. Yes, I’m looking at you, Ampeg and Paul Gilbert. Having done dome rapid research, f-holes work better than round holes az the airflow is (non-intuitively) proportional to the perimeter, not the area (because air velocity is higher the narrower the hole). 4 Quote
Jack Posted Thursday at 19:16 Posted Thursday at 19:16 6 hours ago, Leonard Smalls said: Of course! Never liked crowds... We're playing on Saturday, you'll love it. 4 Quote
bnt Posted Thursday at 19:38 Posted Thursday at 19:38 (edited) 2 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said: Having done dome rapid research, f-holes work better than round holes az the airflow is (non-intuitively) proportional to the perimeter, not the area (because air velocity is higher the narrower the hole). I meant the f-hole shape specifically, not the general idea of a long & thin soundhole. I have one of these guitars and it’s no problem. but this gives me the willies: Edited Thursday at 19:43 by bnt 1 Quote
Shaggy Posted Thursday at 21:59 Posted Thursday at 21:59 Don't mind an f-hole personally, but I'd have to agree that there are more stylish variants 2 Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted Thursday at 22:00 Posted Thursday at 22:00 2 hours ago, bnt said: Well that's almost as silly as this: 1 Quote
AndyTravis Posted Thursday at 22:04 Posted Thursday at 22:04 See - I adore the Ampeg Scrolls. never been in the same room as one though 2 Quote
kiat Posted Thursday at 22:20 Posted Thursday at 22:20 Irrational dislikes? visually messy pedalboards too many wires basses that don't look normal (not in the popular styles of Fender, Musicman,etc) Fender Mustangs headless basses bandmates who repeat the same old corny jokes (and chuckle away before they can get it out of their mouths) on stage to an unimpressed audience - maybe that's rational Flea's playing (sorry fans), but not his basslines grating colours! 1 Quote
razor5cl Posted Thursday at 23:11 Posted Thursday at 23:11 7 hours ago, tauzero said: If you have an irrational fear of cables, go wireless. I also have an irrational fear of batteries dying! I'm just a miserable young scallywag. Thankful my bass only has two pickups though and no piezo volume knob! That sounds awful Quote
snorkie635 Posted yesterday at 08:01 Posted yesterday at 08:01 9 hours ago, AndyTravis said: See - I adore the Ampeg Scrolls. never been in the same room as one though Always book two singles Andy, eh, eh? 1 Quote
Chezz55 Posted yesterday at 08:37 Posted yesterday at 08:37 Painted/coloured headstocks - yuk. 1 Quote
Ed_S Posted yesterday at 08:55 Posted yesterday at 08:55 Referring to 'top' and 'bottom' strings in terms of relative elevation in conventional playing position, instead of musical pitch. 6 Quote
Leonard Smalls Posted yesterday at 09:36 Posted yesterday at 09:36 And can't be doing with Fender basses either... Only ever played one I liked, which was a very expensive masterbuilt custom shop Jazz. And I didn't like that anywhere near as much as my ACG at 1/4 of the price! Quote
tauzero Posted yesterday at 14:21 Posted yesterday at 14:21 5 hours ago, Ed_S said: Referring to 'top' and 'bottom' strings in terms of relative elevation in conventional playing position, instead of musical pitch. I've only known one person, a guitarist, who did that. He also didn't know the difference between B minor and B flat. 1 Quote
TimR Posted yesterday at 16:47 Posted yesterday at 16:47 18 hours ago, Shaggy said: Don't mind an f-hole personally, but I'd have to agree that there are more stylish variants Shouldn't this be on the "Guitars with faces" thread? Quote
jonno1981 Posted yesterday at 16:53 Posted yesterday at 16:53 Those little sliders on graphic eqs for acoustic instruments. Why do they always feel like they cost 5p and a fart from a mouse will knock them out of position? Arrrrrrgh. 2 Quote
bass_dinger Posted yesterday at 17:58 Posted yesterday at 17:58 Guitars and basses with mother of pearl fret markers that fill the whole space between two frets. That's because the mother of pearl sections will sound and feel very different to wooden fretboard sections, and ensure that the tone between the positions is unbalanced. Quote
petecarlton Posted yesterday at 18:34 Posted yesterday at 18:34 34 minutes ago, bass_dinger said: That's because the mother of pearl sections will sound and feel very different to wooden fretboard sections, and ensure that the tone between the positions is unbalanced So not irrational, then? 🤣 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.