Woodinblack Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago I can't see any explanation of caremelised on Harley Benton's site, but the cheap ones appear caramelised, and the more expensive are roasted. In all the press about roasted neck instruments, they mention the neck has been roasted to give extra stability, in all the caramelised ones they just mention it is a nicer colour. If I was to buy an HB with what I see on the net, I would assume that caramelised was just like the presidential tribute spray tan version! 2 Quote
LeftyJ Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Caramelisation is also a thermal treatment, and should not just a layer of caramel-coloured lacquer. That would be rather deceiving. I see the words roasted, baked, caramelized and torrefied used depending on the manufacturer, and usually they all indicate the wood has been heated / thermally treated. Quote
JohnDaBass Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, Stub Mandrel said: Caramelised and roasted both mean that the wood has been treated by torrefaction. Harley Benton may be using different sources/grades but if those necks are merely stained that would be deliberately misleading. Has anyone actually cut a caramelised nevk to check? Orbis it just an assumption. I have not tampered with the neck but I can confirm that the body is alder. I had to modify the body to add two Thunderbird pickups in place of the stock P/J Pups. These are fantastic value for money instruments who's fit, finish and quality far exceed the £199 I paid for mine. 1 Quote
AlexDelores Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago I have to admit that up until about 2 years ago, I don’t think I’d seen a roasted neck. Yet, they seem to be going on everything now. Is there a benefit to the process or is it just the in thing. Genuine question this, I’m not against them, I think they look great. Just curious as to whether there’s more to it than aesthetics. Alex Quote
fretmeister Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 19 minutes ago, AlexDelores said: I have to admit that up until about 2 years ago, I don’t think I’d seen a roasted neck. Yet, they seem to be going on everything now. Is there a benefit to the process or is it just the in thing. Genuine question this, I’m not against them, I think they look great. Just curious as to whether there’s more to it than aesthetics. Alex I have strong suspicions that it is just a way for guitar makers to speed up the drying process of their stock and then come up with a suitable reason for the colour change that punters will believe. 1 2 Quote
scrumpymike Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, AlexDelores said: I have to admit that up until about 2 years ago, I don’t think I’d seen a roasted neck. Yet, they seem to be going on everything now. Is there a benefit to the process or is it just the in thing. Genuine question this, I’m not against them, I think they look great. Just curious as to whether there’s more to it than aesthetics. Alex I think that it's a question of how long the neck is left on the BBQ / in the pizza oven - whatever the heat source is. My understanding is that the full roasting process is necessary to achieve the stability benefits and that, by that stage, you're very close to ending up with a lump of charcoal apparently. Obviouslt the neck has then to be sealed in a way that stops any moisture getting back in. Can't remember where I actually read the above but I think it was in the course of researching Wilcock basses. I now have one btw but it looks like the neck has been cooked by somebody who eats his steak raw. 1 Quote
EssentialTension Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, Clarky said: Bass the World review of Rick 4030S I've never been tempted by a Rickenbacker ..................................... until now. 1 Quote
EssentialTension Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 56 minutes ago, EssentialTension said: I've never been tempted by a Rickenbacker ..................................... until now. However, I've also lost interest rather swiftly. 2 Quote
dmckee Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago But have they just taken a standard Ric and moved the bridge 4 inches into the body?? Quote
Clarky Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 48 minutes ago, dmckee said: But have they just taken a standard Ric and moved the bridge 4 inches into the body?? Thats about the size of it. So the bass will not be significantly lighter than a standard Rick, which would have been one of the attactions to me. Lots of discussion in this thread: https://www.basschat.co.uk/topic/517825-new-rickenbacker-short-scale-the-4030s/ Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 hours ago, fretmeister said: I have strong suspicions that it is just a way for guitar makers to speed up the drying process of their stock and then come up with a suitable reason for the colour change that punters will believe. 'Torrefaction' is heat treating timber above 180⁰ causing the maillard reaction - there are many processes wikipedia lists hot nitrogen, steam, oil and even molten metal has been used. The extreme version prepares wood pellets for furnaces. A less extreme one produces cladding for use in saunas. It increases stability and resistance to humidity (to the extent guitar necks may not need lacquer) but reduces strength. Presumably the ideal is enough treatment to improve stability without causing brittleness. In the long run, therefore, it may not follow that more extreme or expensive processes are better - although I imagine a well controlled process is more predictable. No one seems to have actually tested or decided if they SOUND better or are more or less durable yet. But they look nice and the thin finishes that can be used feel nice. My guess is that Harley Benton's caramelisation and roasting differ in detail - if only by being done in different places. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.