Steve Browning Posted yesterday at 14:25 Posted yesterday at 14:25 (edited) 13 minutes ago, TimR said: Anything divided by 7... My late father was in 49 Squadron during the war. And there were 7 in the crew of a Lancaster. Edited yesterday at 14:26 by Steve Browning 2 Quote
MacDaddy Posted yesterday at 14:28 Posted yesterday at 14:28 Because playing with a pick is so much easier, I do think it's cheating Quote
bnt Posted yesterday at 14:45 Posted yesterday at 14:45 27 minutes ago, TimR said: Anything divided by 7... well … any integer or rational number divided by 7 is a rational number, since 7 is also an integer. 3/7 = rational (3/7) /7 =3/49 = rational 🤓 1 Quote
asingardenof Posted yesterday at 15:52 Posted yesterday at 15:52 (edited) . Edited 23 hours ago by asingardenof posted in the wrong forum 1 Quote
tegs07 Posted yesterday at 16:09 Posted yesterday at 16:09 10 minutes ago, asingardenof said: For those aware of the saga relating to my car, at a hearing in July to discuss setting the judgment I'd obtained aside, it turned out the dealership may not have been getting their post so their defence was reinstated, and we were firmly encouraged by the judge to try and sort it ourselves before coming back to court. The dealer's director collared me after the hearing to say he'd call me to discuss a settlement, but after nearly two months, and an email and two voice messages from me that haven't been responded to, I've still not heard a dicky bird from them. So I'll be down another £180-odd for the trial fee and off to court we go again in October. Sorry to hear this. I really don’t know what is happening to customer service in the UK. I have a couple of fairly simple things that need sorting that rely on other companies and their woeful customer service. One of which involves money owed and the other retirement planning. In one case 10 months have passed without resolution, the other getting on for two months. The legwork and staggering incompetence involved is depressing. Thankfully I have a little time and am not financially strapped or the impact would be far worse. I feel your pain. Customer service is a race to the bottom in the UK. Happy to take your cash but very slow to provide any service and getting cash back from them …. 1 Quote
Len_derby Posted yesterday at 16:27 Posted yesterday at 16:27 Grumpy middle-aged men winging about their First World problems on the General Discussion page of a Bass/music forum? 😂 1 3 Quote
TimR Posted yesterday at 19:09 Posted yesterday at 19:09 2 hours ago, Len_derby said: Grumpy middle-aged men winging about their First World problems on the General Discussion page of a Bass/music forum? 😂 Grumpy middle-aged men whinging about grumpy middle-aged men whinging on the General Discussion page of a Bass/music forum? 😂 1 3 Quote
petecarlton Posted yesterday at 19:32 Posted yesterday at 19:32 3 hours ago, asingardenof said: For those aware of the saga relating to my car, at a hearing in July to discuss setting the judgment I'd obtained aside, it turned out the dealership may not have been getting their post so their defence was reinstated, and we were firmly encouraged by the judge to try and sort it ourselves before coming back to court. The dealer's director collared me after the hearing to say he'd call me to discuss a settlement, but after nearly two months, and an email and two voice messages from me that haven't been responded to, I've still not heard a dicky bird from them. So I'll be down another £180-odd for the trial fee and off to court we go again in October. Irrational? 1 Quote
Len_derby Posted yesterday at 20:15 Posted yesterday at 20:15 1 hour ago, TimR said: Grumpy middle-aged men whinging about grumpy middle-aged men whinging on the General Discussion page of a Bass/music forum? 😂 You’re being very generous, Tim. The only places I would now be considered middle-aged are a care home and an Anglican Church congregation. 😂 4 Quote
asingardenof Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 2 hours ago, petecarlton said: Irrational? Not paying attention and posted in the wrong forum... 1 Quote
Geek99 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago (edited) 11 hours ago, Len_derby said: You’re being very generous, Tim. The only places I would now be considered middle-aged are a care home and an Anglican Church congregation. 😂 And here, where you’re just a junior Or perhaps in the House of Lords Edited 13 hours ago by Geek99 1 Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, Marvin said: Trousers, jeans or such like and no belt. Closely related... jeans with the crotch hear knee level. Sorry Gary Stringer... Saw a tall guy in the supermarket the other day, well over a foot taller than his partner. They both appeared to have legs the same length... 2 3 Quote
SteveXFR Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Nissan Juke drivers. What's wrong with them? Why are they all such terrible drivers with no awareness of what's going on around them? If Im on my motorbike, I will always be extremely cautious around them and expect the worst of them. Quote
bass_dinger Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, Stub Mandrel said: Saw a tall guy in the supermarket the other day, well over a foot taller than his partner. They both appeared to have legs the same length... The obvious explanation is that the tall guy is accidentally wearing his partner's trousers. 3 Quote
tegs07 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, SteveXFR said: Nissan Juke drivers. What's wrong with them? Why are they all such terrible drivers with no awareness of what's going on around them? If Im on my motorbike, I will always be extremely cautious around them and expect the worst of them. They must be visually impaired to buy such a fecking ugly car! 2 1 Quote
Jackroadkill Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 5 hours ago, Marvin said: Trousers, jeans or such like and no belt. I always say the my Nana told me never to trust a man who doesn't wear a belt. It's not true but it sounds cool. How anyone can go belt-less is beyond me. 1 Quote
Dad3353 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 3 minutes ago, Jackroadkill said: ... How anyone can go belt-less is beyond me. Not many of my trousers have carriers for wearing a belt. I rely on their elasticity; it can be embarrassing if this starts to fail whilst I'm carrying something in both arms, for instance. Edited 4 hours ago by Dad3353 1 Quote
Boodang Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 45 minutes ago, Jackroadkill said: How anyone can go belt-less is beyond me. My savile row suits fit perfectly, no belt needed, I don't know what the issue is. Quote
snorkie635 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, Dad3353 said: Not many of my trousers have carriers for wearing a belt. I rely on their elasticity; it can be embarrassing if this starts to fail whilst I'm carrying something in both arms, for instance. Boasting again Douglas? Quote
Grooverjr Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago If we are on trousers length, then the daft fashion for deliberately short trousers. It seems to be on the wane, thankfully. I like a jazzy sock as much as the next man and a small viewing window is fine but these things that look like they shrank in the wash make me unnecessarily irritated. Quote
SteveXFR Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 hours ago, tegs07 said: They must be visually impaired to buy such a fecking ugly car! Yeah that's a fair point Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.