Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

GreeneKing

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    3,991
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GreeneKing

  1. A bit of ritual disembowelling of guitard? He's a good sort actually. Having heard elsewhere what an EAD can project I'm sure that the cab part of my equation is covered. Maybe a part of this is just GAS? You are right Stu, I do need to get out front and listen to what's going on. The two guitarists do this and they like the sound of the bass as it is. The Aguilar is a cracking amp and I'm ready to believe that Aguilar under rate their wattage. The Aggie was only struggling (3 o'clock on the master volume with a volume control that feels non linear like most) in very poor conditions. I perhaps need to stick with what I've got and 'suck it and see' for the time being. I do think that the GB SM 9.2 is rather nice too though
  2. I'm currently using an Aguilar AG500 head through my EAD Foundation 212 cab. It's the twin channel head. I love my tone and use the clean channel all the time if I'm honest. I play in a classic rock covers band and like a clean lower mid focused tone without too much clanky finger noise or zing. Our lead guitarist has just bought a Marshall 100W valve head with a 4 x 12 cab, seriously nice gear if that's your thing. At a practice recently in a church with horrible acoustics my Aguilar head was maxed out and struggling. Last night at practice we were back to the normal hall, he used his smaller combo and I was happy with my master volume at about 1 o'clock. I do find that the Aguilar clips very early on the gain (and clips a little before the clip light comes on). I can see him using his monster rig at gigs and as we're a loud band anyway (starting with the drummer who belts it out - but very well) so I'm thinking of getting a head with more 'headroom' to ensure that I can always get the necessary volume. My thoughts originally turned to the GB Shuttlemax 9.2 mainly because it has the FET channel that sounds right for me and the added controls on the presets. Then I got to reading about the TC RH 750. Now I owned a RH 450 and I'm one of those who just didn't get on with the tone. It's hard to say exactly why but it seemed a bit 'wooly'. I just ended up not wanting to use it without really understanding why. Perhaps if the RH 750 has the same tone I won't get on with it too? I'm aware that Wattage isn't a clear indicator of volume or the ability of a rig to give the tone you want at the necessary volume for the band and setting. I'm a bit concerned that I could go for more watts and not actually be any better off. The cab is a monster and isn't changing. I really can't imagine any better cab and anyone who's heard an EAD at the Moffat Bass Bash A/B testing would surely agree Peter
  3. Me too
  4. Does it still have the the Nordstrand I put in it? Great bass made even better by that pup. One of the very best basses I've owned. If I didn't already have too may basses AND I'd have spotted this earlier AND I had the money I'd have jumped at it.
  5. I have one of these, bought out of nostalgia as I had one as my 1st bass. Seriously nice especially for the money.
  6. [quote name='kennyrodg' timestamp='1352674866' post='1866076'] Still got mine.....Love it. Fantastic back up head but plenty good enough and powerful enough to use as a main gigging head. 500 watts at 2ohms.....what's not to love about it. I used mine last week for the second set of a Blues gig. On the "modern" setting it was damn close to the tone of my Eden WT550, just as loud too. I have one of the presets set to zero output volume so it works just like a mute button....very handy. [/quote] Glad it's still going strong
  7. Brilliant product!
  8. Cheers Stu, I've tried Bandmix but I must give the others a go.
  9. As our singer has proved very unreliable we're left with a classic rock band with no front person and singer. We are an easy going bunch with preference for someone who'll be 100% committed. Peter
  10. [quote name='Count Bassy' timestamp='1352819597' post='1867817'] This. - just keep the groove going [/quote] +1
  11. Well given that the first inch or so of string coming over the bridge and the nut is almost redundant in terms of vibration then I suspect that a tapered string will make it a lot better.
  12. Thank you. I presently have 2 ACGs, a custom Salace 5 headless and a J5. They both have U Retro's. I'm planning something around an ACG03. Alan's role in bringing ideas into fruition shouldn't be underestimated either
  13. I can't dress frets, especially if some are low. I bought a new Tony Butler sig Vintage P at a good price but the frets are awful. Rather than send it back I decided to invest in my 1st luthier appointment. Phil Hartley in Bolton does a set up for £40 and will add a fret dress for another £60 including nut work. I'm waiting to see when it's ready and hoping that it'll be transformed. It'll still just be a P bass though
  14. Wasn't this Dave Perry's originally? If so I can verify it being a great bass.
  15. I commissioned this bass:) It's a beauty. I sold it because I thought that 5 string players couldn't be 4 string players too. I was wrong I'd be interested in the link too. Peter
  16. I sold Ben my TRB5 bass. He was really good to deal with, a true gent. Peter
  17. I've been feeling a little bad about this bass because I sold it a short while ago. I'd just like to say that I owned it for a while and the neck is super stable and there are no issues. I had no need to adjust the truss rods (I'm not normally shy of adjusting neck relief if it needs it) because the action is perfect for me. You also need a shorter than usual allen key to get to them. Suffice to say that I wasn't aware that the trussrod adjusters were a little misaligned. When I bought the bass originally it was in dire need of new strings and a really good clean (it was a bit grim in that respect). It came up beautifully and it's a great player plus the trussrods do work - no issue. I've owned 3 TRB6's and this one was the best of a good bunch no doubt So bump for a great example of the breed. The electrics including the piezo bridge are all in order too. Peter
  18. Nice one, I knew an Essex boy'd get there. Isn't there a sticky for posting images somewhere?
  19. Look for a Bass collection, not the new range but the older ones. They come up for a good price, are light, well made and a delight to play imo. Peter
  20. [quote name='robbobass' timestamp='1352504444' post='1864110'] I tried to post 2 pics via photof***et - but it didn't work wither - think I'm gonna leave this site - it's sh*t!!! [/quote] Welcome - errr I think.
  21. I don't know about horrible. I quite like it.
  22. This is a Mk1 TRB6p with a 34" scale and I think it's nearer 30 than 20 years old. A better bass than the more recent models imo. Bump for a great instrument.
  23. Provisionally sold.
  24. This is indeed a great bass and Mark is a top guy to deal with. Peter
  25. Looking at what the others are going for (even if they aren't in such good condition) and due to some up and coming expenses I'm dropping this to pounds 400 plus P&P. This is a give away believe me Peter
×
×
  • Create New...