Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Bass Culture

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    1,000
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Bass Culture

  • Birthday 20/02/1963

Personal Information

  • Location
    Chester

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Bass Culture's Achievements

Experienced

Experienced (11/14)

  • Great Content Rare
  • Basschat Hero Rare

Recent Badges

470

Total Watts

  1. I think Mike wants to record some vid and sound samples when I collect it, so I'll post a link if we get that sorted.
  2. Welll this has been the very pleasantist of surprises, and quite made my day! Absolutely stunning work, @Cosmicrain - thank you! Bring on Friday!
  3. Latest batch of update photos from Mike, and time to start getting proper excited now, I think! 😊 Scheduled to pick up next weekend at present. Mike's been testing the various pickup connections at each stage of assembly, but has not so far been able to sound test them. I can't wait to hear them. He's a true artist and I've no doubt at all they'll sound every bit as good as they and the bass looks.
  4. New wiring and old wiring are referred to in the Turner (I think, could be Herrick though) multicoil (I.e. 'Wal-type) pickup blurb and, I think, the Lusithand preamp copy too. I assumed it referred to Wal's wiring as these products are presented as very close alternatives to the Wal components on which they are obviously based. Funkle also refers to new wiring in his epic Building a Wal-a-like thread. Maybe I've misunderstood though, and these alternative wiring options apply to these new items only and not the Wal originals?
  5. It undoubtedly makes a significant contribution, but seeing as passive Wal's reportedly also have the same characteristic 'core tone', I believe the pickups (and how they are wired?) make an equal or possibly even greater contribution.
  6. I'm sure the hive mind will prevail, Mike! 😊
  7. Can anyone explain to me how the so-called new wiring for Wal pickups differs from the old wiring, and when it changed? Also, what difference does it make in terms of tone? I found myself pondering on this question when reading the various threads on BC that reference the characteristic Wal tone, and it occured to me that, given this change in how the pickups are wired, is the Wal tone the same now as it was pre-change? EDIT - Mods, please move to Repairs/Technical if you think that's the more appropriate location.
  8. Couple more photos which show the body after three (I think) coats of Mike's wax and oil mix.
  9. More like a V where the pointy bit is less pointy, with a softer/gentler curve, but still provides a definite reference point for your thumb.
  10. I thought I'd leave starting this thread until there was some reasonable progress to show. When Rautia, who'd supplied the pickups for my my first Wal-a-like, closed down, Mike and I spoke about him developing his own multi-coil pickups and I decided to commission a new bass which would be the guinea pig for these in-house designs. The first bass had been paired with a Lusithand filter pre, but I decided I wanted this one to be different and that we'd go passive - Wal passive models still have their own distinctive Wal tone, after all. At around the same time I returned the first bass to Mike to swap out the rather cheap monorail bridge units I'd supplied to him when it was built for some more substantial Hipshot items. During the course of this work it became apparent that one of the original Rautia pickups had developed a problem and that they would need to be changed, so he was now making two pairs of pickups for me. This was to be the start of an extensive period of research which involved Mike investigating all aspects of the design, specification and topography of the Wal originals, which has only now culminated in him finally being able to start winding his own pickups - with the help of a new coil winder he's just invested in. Specs for the new bass are: Zoot Boudica body shape Paulownia body with wenge top and back - wax & oil finish Multi-laminate neck of roasted maple and mahogany with maple and wenge stringers. Soft V profile 32" scale with 38mm nut. 18mm string spacing at bridge 2 x new Zoot multicoil pickups V/T and series/parallel switch per pickup Zoot solid brass bridge Hipshot ultralite tuners and string retainer Here's some progress pictures:
  11. I'm glad I'm not the only one around here who likes the Wal-type V profile! I see it decried quite frequently but it absolutely made sense when I played a friend's Mach* 1 fretless back in the 80's and I've had all my Zoot Customs made with it since. *I seem to remember Mach being the correct designation from an old marketing leaflet some decades ago, but it's not beyond the realms of possibility I'm misremebering...or have simply dreamed it!
  12. I remember seeing that bass (the JG prefixed serial number ones?) being featured in one of the mags at the time. But to me that was the thing about Wal's when they first became popular (as a now 60-year old, I'm talking about the early 80's), they looked quite different to anything else around at the time too. The oiled natural finish of the Customs especially wasn't really something anyone else was doing, I recall. Mind you, as appealing as I found them, I wouldn't be enticed inot parting with the kind of five figure sums now they can fetch now. My Zoot Wal-alike gets me quite close enough to scratch that particular itch.
  13. Very true. I have my own Zoot 'Wal-alike', made by MIke Walsh, which is so much more comfortable to play than the real thing. One of the original pickups developed a problem and this has inspired Mike to start making his own multi-coils, which he's going to offer on his own range of Wal-alike basses. Knowing the research he's done, I suspect they are going to be as close to the originals as it is possible to get (having had many conversations with him I'm now much more aware than previously of the complex and multiple specification and topographical considerations involved). The latest version of the Lusithand pre is also voiced slightly differently too, I believe. So - as Russ says - there's plenty of options out there for those hankering after the Wal sound without having the patience and pockets deep enough to go 'full Wal'. My own next 'Wal-alike' will be using MIke's new pickups too, but will be passive, so it will be interesting to hear how close it gets without the filter preamp. Still it's own variation of a Wal, of course, but from a much earlier era and iteration.
  14. What the hell does 'world-leading pickups' mean? Leading the world in what exactly?! I'm blaming my age, but the nonsensical bo**ocks that is employed in the name of marketing and that is so ubiquitous these days is really starting to grind my gears...
  15. Thanks for all the replies, much appreciated. BC
×
×
  • Create New...