itu

This really depends. This may be true in a small scale civil project, but not obvious in every area. Besides, some problems/bugs may be found, when those two systems are tested extensively. In my previous life one of my coders once said he does not code bugs... well, who does?

Make a search and try to find D'Addario's string tension file (13940 pdf or something like that). It has different tensions for strings, and how the tension changes, if you detune. If you learn to read that, you are able to make even tension sets or special tunings with similar tension compared to a, say .45 set. BEAD is pretty common, just like CGDA. You can tune your bass to fifts, if you like. But that file will help you in your trials.

What I have seen in production - in person - I would say our dear @Quatschmacher is right. Two versions equal twice the testing. Just locking out something may lead to very strange behaviour in the unit. Without extensive tests the limited/disabled version is not automatically stable.

As seen here, it might be eye-opening for many potential users to show different user scenarios: - rack units - certain pedals (FI!) - other unit communicating via MIDI That could help users with less MIDI-knowledge to see possibilities that are there, but aren't so obvious to us mortals.

If the piezo is already buffered, there's no need for an extra preamp.

My uneducated guess is something around £500, which is already steep. I think, this is a good example of a super unit: An ultimate expression pedal that is nearly impossible to find nowadays: https://www.sourceaudio.net/reflex-expression-controller.html Top unit, top performance, too good, too short-lived.

Beaten, not broken.

Light coloured necks are not my thing, to be honest... but the bass still looks good. Some cleaning might help with the fretboard. Was the price right/very reasonable?

It may be so, that it is feasible to buy it at its release. After the first or second batch the sales will be lower and the availability may be limited. Just thinking about the possible scenarios I saw in the electronics markets years ago. (I wish this kind of special product will be living long!)

If not bands, we still have: Race Elliott Ender Arkbass / Markass Spectro Arshall Analogman, well that's obvious Ampler Zoo

Pioneers of the furniture bass!

There's one brand that has highest end basses but their designs have always been a question mark for me: Alembic. I am not to say they are ugly, but not all of them are pretty. During 1980's several brands produced heavy metal basses that were not only ugly but also ridiculous. On the other hand ABBA and Bootsy were not so serious...

Add-on to the box is a Bluetooth unit. Page turning of a tablet would be one very useful function.

I thought the same with my MG Quantum 5 SPi. I tried many gauges, but .120 sounded the best ever against all expectations. Maybe the 35" scale and carbon graphite were parts of that equation.

Had a gig in Switzerland few weeks ago. Last time Swissair destroyed my Modulus Graphite HSC. Not the bass, although it was a close shave. This time I decided to keep my bass beside me all the time. I have a bitsa with a J body and a Status MM4 neck. I took the bass apart at home, and put it together after arriving to Zürich. The neck is so stable that there were no issues with it. After the gig I took the bass apart and flew back. The bitsa is now my ultimate travel instrument. (I have screw inserts in the neck.)

You want to try flats, start saving.

They have actually three, if we exclude their multiunits: Thunderstorm (the big, heavy, and cheapo), Vortex (toneprint in bigger or smaller box), and the original SCF (Stereo Chorus/pitch modulator/Flanger).

Who was the first to use the bow? Jerry Auerswald? Roland G-77 synth bass?

Ink Loyd Loudless Sam the Ham and the pharaoes Katrina and the awes (L)ever 42 AC/WC Erosmith Rye Cooler Stink John McLaughin' Airground Fattraction Simply Ed Pelvis Presley

tce SCF.

I like the ideas behind the instrument, as well as the whole bass itself. Congrats! (By the way: how is a fast neck specified?)

Coil-magnet pickup is a band-pass filter: it does not reach very high frequencies, nor it does go to DC in the low end. The response is everything but flat.

If the cab is airtight, that will be functional. If not, the element, and the bass response will suffer.

Flat response and coil-magnet pickup? Contradictionary terms.

Loudness depends on more than one or two parametres. Wattage is pretty poor indicator, although it is one part of the complicated equation. Impedance is misleading, as it is usually marked as one number, while it actually changes quite a lot depending on the frequency. Listen to the sound, and choose the one that you like. If your choice depends on the specifications, do your homework and read the marketing stuff. Many of the meaningful parametres are not published.