Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

maple vs rosewood what's your choice?


hagguy
 Share

Recommended Posts

For years i'd convinced myself that i liked maple boards.....

...until i got my NYC Sadowsky with a Brazilian rosewood board! it sounds fantastic, lovely and smooth with a really sweet high end!

The Morado board on my Metro Sadowsky sounds very close to maple but without that awful clanky [b]GAWK[/b] :) sound that ive found some maple boarded basses to have

:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do love the look of maple. But maple on a jazz just doesn't seem to go... don't ask, I can't really explain it. But on a precision, maple fretboards look KILLER.

I love my current bass, with the rosewood and pearl inlays. I prefer rosewood for playability too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fingerboard material needs to be dense as it takes quite a pounding, especially from round wounds. Maple is a hard wood but not as dense as rosewood and less so than ebony - the only wood more dense than water. The string touches the fret and so slight differences in the density of the wood under the fret is going to have a very small influence on the sound especially when compared to the pickups, amps, speakers etc. Being less dense, why maple would sound brighter is beyond me and I have never been able to carry out an experiment with identical body, pickups etc to see if it really does. If it does, and there's plenty who say so, it must be marginal. I would suggest it LOOKS brighter and wonder if this influences the perceived sound.

Maple fingerboards tend to be lacquered which gives them a different feel to bare wood. There is clearly a preference here, my own opinion goes for bare wood such as rosewood, but actually most of the contact from your finger is on the string, not the fingerboard.

I would not deny the influence of the neck material on the sound, although, again, this must surely be marginal. A rosewood finger board would have to pass vibrations through the glued joint between the neck and fingerboard. These are usually pretty good joints, certainly better than the bolted Fender style neck to body joint. Few complain about those and, I would suggest, those bolt-on neck joints would have a greater influence on the sound than the fingerboard to neck joint. Many maple fingerboards are separate too and so would also have this joint.

In terms of shape there is no reason why a rosewood fingerboard should have a slimmer cross-section than an all maple neck. In fact, the opposite would be more likely. A rosewood fingerboard are mostly rectangular and so a cross-section of the assembly would show a flat section at the sides of the fingerboard before the curve of the neck. Necks of basses I have with no separate fingerboard curve all the way to the edge of the finger board. The maple neck on my Musicman is very slim, one of the reasons I bought it.

Placing the frets straight into the neck Fender style is the easiest and cheapest way as it cuts out the process of buying another type of wood and making a fretboard. With thousands of Fenders being made every week this economy is easily understood (although I recognise there's no price difference in the shops between the two). Should it become damaged or actually wear out, however, it can't be replaced like a separate fingerboard.

Regarding looks, clearly that's up to each one of us. The maple fingerboards are lacquered to keep them looking clean. Anyone with an old one will see how quickly the wood under chips in the lacquer goes grimy. The grime doesn't penetrate the denser woods and can be scrubbed off.

Choice for me, black 'n' maple every time!

Edited by 4 Strings
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont have a preference.

On certain basses one works, on others the other works.

Either looks stunning on the right instrument, both can sound either too bright or too dull dependant on a squillion other variables with so much more tonal influence that its not even an issue.

The Roscoe is maple the old Vester is Rosewood and the VMJ is ebonol, they all sound, look and play great to me :)

Edited by 51m0n
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like both and own both. I was a maple worshipper for years but recently have been acknowledging the joys of rosewood. If anything I lean more towards rosewood these days after 20yrs of shouting about maple but I prefer the maintainance free nature of maple to messing around with lemon oil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rosewood would always be my choice.

I have both, but the tone from rosewood is richer IMHO.

I have an epoxy'd rosewood fretless jazz neck, which is a tone monster. I was amazed that no tone was lost when the neck was epoxy'd.

Maple is cool for slapping though and Marcus Miller get's a stonking tone.

Horses for courses. There's no right or wrong.

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='OutToPlayJazz' post='764519' date='Mar 4 2010, 09:51 PM']I love a glossed maple neck, [b]but rosewood always seems to help with a fuller and richer, more balanced sound.[/b][/quote]

That'll be your core tone then will it? :rolleyes: :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='OutToPlayJazz' post='764519' date='Mar 4 2010, 09:51 PM']I love a glossed maple neck, but rosewood always seems to help with a fuller and richer, more balanced sound.[/quote]

I must say, I can't see how this is the case, especially as maple is softer than rosewood. I certainly have not found it to be true with the (relatively few, I admit) basses I've played, although I've not been able to carry out a direct comparison.

Surely even the quality of the lead will have a greater effect than whether the fingerboard is glossed maple or not.

Edited by 4 Strings
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant say that I have noticed a tonal difference, too many other factors involved, but personal visual choice is rosewood for fretted (and lined fretless) and maple for unlined fretless. Black coated strings on a bright maple neck just looks so good to me. Yeah shallow, I know :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...