SteveXFR Posted yesterday at 14:47 Posted yesterday at 14:47 What does a reverse P configuration achieve compared to the standard Fender configuration? Ive got a bass with each type of P pickup but they're so different in terms of preamp and pickup position and bridge setup that I can't tell what reversing them has done. Quote
Lozz196 Posted yesterday at 15:15 Posted yesterday at 15:15 The main thing for me is thinner strings further from bridge/thicker nearer the bridge must make for a better balance. I often find that the D (and G should I ever use it) lack depth in comparison to the E & A. 6 Quote
neepheid Posted yesterday at 15:18 Posted yesterday at 15:18 It subtly changes the sound, and gives people yet another thing to endlessly debate the virtues of on an electric bass 4 10 Quote
ghostwheel Posted yesterday at 15:57 Posted yesterday at 15:57 I love it on my HB MP-4 (EMGs and LHZ-04), but am note quite resolved about it on a Squier Contemporary Precision (rerouted for reversed P) with Bartolinis Classic and flats. Quote
SteveXFR Posted yesterday at 16:23 Author Posted yesterday at 16:23 1 hour ago, neepheid said: It subtly changes the sound, and gives people yet another thing to endlessly debate the virtues of on an electric bass Is it up there with the nitro vs poly paint tone debate? Quote
Beedster Posted yesterday at 17:05 Posted yesterday at 17:05 Yamaha use it and they know their stuff 👍 1 Quote
Steve Browning Posted yesterday at 17:34 Posted yesterday at 17:34 It's filed in the same drawer as rack straying over the sides of the cab underneath. A drawer that must not be opened!! Quote
Stofferson Posted yesterday at 18:54 Posted yesterday at 18:54 Prefer it personally, better balance across the strings. Got this one, and another on the way 7 Quote
SteveXFR Posted yesterday at 21:35 Author Posted yesterday at 21:35 (edited) 4 hours ago, Beedster said: Yamaha use it and they know their stuff 👍 My BB1100S has conventional, Fender style P pickup. My Spector has reverse P Edited yesterday at 21:36 by SteveXFR Quote
Bassassin Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Logic suggests there should be a better tonal balance, experience (which in my case is a Yammy BB400 fretless & a Washburn SB40 P/J) doesn't really demonstrate much appreciable difference. I sold the Yam because I couldn't get the fretless tone I wanted with a P pickup. There's probably an argument for it on a 2x P, or any bass with the pickup closer to the bridge than normal, but I dunno. I quite like the look. Quote
PaulThePlug Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago All this better tonal balance across the stringz, but maybe in the design time the halves were that way to reduce the bass boom of the E and Increase the treble bell of the G for a wider range of tones across the strings. Amps and Cabs in those days etc. Quote
Nail Soup Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago For anyone who doesn't know, could someone explain what a reverse P configuration is? Quote
PaulThePlug Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) For Info, the Mk1 Barts often fitted in Ibanez and Cort are Reverse P in a Soap Bar... not my pickup Which might explain why they often score less favourable when compared to a Bart Full Humbucker Soapbar. Edited 4 hours ago by PaulThePlug Quote
neepheid Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Nail Soup said: For anyone who doesn't know, could someone explain what a reverse P configuration is? It's when the E and A half of a split pickup is closer to the bridge than the D and G half. Regular way is the other way round. 1 Quote
SteveXFR Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 31 minutes ago, Nail Soup said: For anyone who doesn't know, could someone explain what a reverse P configuration is? @neepheid beat me to it and explain it better Edited 3 hours ago by SteveXFR 1 Quote
Nail Soup Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, neepheid said: It's when the E and A half of a split pickup is closer to the bridge than the D and G half. Regular way is the other way round. 53 minutes ago, SteveXFR said: @neepheid beat me to it and explain it better Thanks for the explanation understood! But as I lean a little towards the "it sounds like a bass" camp, I won't be contributing much to the discussion 😆. Quote
Dood Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago There's a great example video on YouTube I saw a while ago. Its very subtle but the timbre does change from one position to the other. Three of my basses are reverse P (notably the Fender Power Jazz Bass Special model) and I have reviewed a good pile Spector basses over the years with reverse P pickups in them too. Tonally I prefer the sound of my 76 precision with the standard layout but one thing that certainly does sound WAY better is a PJ set in the reverse configuration. The D&G strinsg need that distance between the coils of the P and J to sound less thin together. Quote
Dood Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I don't think it was this one, but still, I can hear the difference:- Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.