Linus27 Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 2 hours ago, Misdee said: I very strongly disagree with this version of history. If you or anybody else enjoys Hooky's playing and find it inspiring for whatever reason then good luck to you, nothing wrong with that. If you like and enjoy his style that's good enough reason. But that doesn't mean that objectively he is an accomplished musician or indeed qualified in any way to judge other exponents of the bass. He's just someone who people who don't play the bass think must be important because they've heard of him .Whenever I hear him interviewed about playing the bass he seems to be full of self-regard, mainly for his own lack of ability, something which he mistakenly sees as a great asset. That's why I think he is a conspicuously bad choice to present this series. I was passionately interested in music in 1979, just like you were, and in playing the bass. I thought Peter Hook was a crap bass player then, and I've heard nothing to change my mind in the interim period. Listening to him thrashing away was depressing back then, and it takes me right back whenever I hear it now. Lots of kids played like that in those days, I think that Hooky was just the one who ended up being famous. In the early ,1980's most bass players not playing slap or fretless were not influenced by his style. He still wasn't that well-known by then, and there were plenty of other role models. For post-punk bass players in the early '80's (and I know because I was one of them) bassists like Sting, Bruce Foxton Horace Panter and JJ Burnel were far more influential than Peter Hook. The idea that Joy Division were such an important band at that time is a classic example of a tale told in the telling. They had a cult following and a certain profile in the music press, but their "legend" is something which has been created subsequently by people with an agenda which necessitates rewriting history to their own ends. When they were together they were a moderately well-known post-punk band from Manchester. Nothing more than that. And regarding any equivalence between Mick Karn and Peter Hook, there isn't any. The crucial difference between the two is that Mick Karn's style is defined by his imagination, not by his limitations. It's also wrong to claim that Mick Karn wasn't a trained musician when he had a background in playing the oboe in orchestras ect. I know he claimed to have no knowledge of scales and chords ect, but in practise he clearly did. His facility on the instrument is in a different stratosphere to Peter Hook (and most other bass players, for that matter). That should be obvious to anyone who listens. I pretty much agree with most of what you've said, the only thing I kind of dont agree with is being moderately well known. Despite being together for only 4 years, they still achieved success with Love Will Tear Us Apart which charted at No.13 in 1980 in the main UK chart and No.1 in the UK independent chart. Their album, Closer also topped the UK independent album chart. New Order however have the biggest selling 12" record in history, 2 No.1 albums and a no.1 single so quite a bit more success. If you replace Joy Division with The Smith's, then what you wrote fits both bands, short lifespan, moderate success and cult following, a no.1 in the independent chart but minor success in the main charts. I'm not a fan of either bands really but I do love New Order. Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago On 16/11/2025 at 16:37, Misdee said: It's not on for nearly two weeks yet and I'm already getting annoyed at who the inevitable candidates will be.😄 Let me put it to you this way, I can already see three bass players who definitely shouldn't be included. 🫢 Michael Rosen? Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago On 16/11/2025 at 17:28, Baloney Balderdash said: I can't speak of the bass in Foo Fighters, haven't really listened to any of their songs, other than what I haven't been able to avoid, it seems like pretty plain boring rock to me. Try Monkey Wrench. Foo Fighters basslines songs are deceptive, full of syncopation, space, unintuitive structure. Even their simplest songs will add a beat, drop a bar or stick in an unexpected rhythm change. 2 Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago On 16/11/2025 at 21:01, Linus27 said: If it was my choice then it would be Pino Palladino Chatting to a friend the other day, back in the 70s his band needed a stand in bassist for a European tour. They auditioned Pino and turned him down. 🙄 1 Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Not the greatest, perhaps, but the three bass players I would most enjoy seeing interviewed: Leo Lyons - stepped up the virtuosity in blues rock bass from his jazz roots. Dave Pegg - transformed folk-rock bass from a gentle accompaniment to the equal of any other instrument. Jim Lea. Becoz. Quote
Sparky Mark Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago (edited) 10 minutes ago, Stub Mandrel said: Chatting to a friend the other day, back in the 70s his band needed a stand in bassist for a European tour. They auditioned Pino and turned him down. 🙄 Perhaps Pino was crap back then and your friend's rejection spurred him on to become the player we all revere today. He should feel proud. Edited 17 hours ago by Sparky Mark 1 Quote
Geek99 Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago On 16/11/2025 at 18:09, tauzero said: It works well within the context of U2, but would you describe him as a virtuoso? No, but he is capable of more than he does on most “standard” u2 records The three sunrises, for example Quote
BigRedX Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago @Misdee I'm obviously not going to change your mind, but I'm not at all convinced by the alternatives you put forward. Apart from JJ Burnel who had an interesting sound (if you could get past the thuggery and misogyny for which there was no excuse even back in 1977) they were just bass players in their bands and if they weren't also the singer, fairly anonymous. Sting is far more interesting as a songwriter than he is as a bass player. The only remarkable thing about him as a bass player is that most of the early Police songs were played on fretless bass, although if you hadn't seen them live you were unlikely to know that. I suspect that you and me were listening to completely different bands back in the early 80s, but IME if you weren't plodding away at 1/8 root notes or slapping, then you were trying to be Mick Karn or Peter Hook. Maybe it's because what Hooky did was easy and within the reach of almost anyone who picked up a bass that you don't like it? However you can't deny that he changed perceptions of how his choice of instrument could fit into a band and song arrangement. There's not many musicians playing any instrument who can say that. 3 Quote
SumOne Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago "I haven't seen the programme, and I haven't got much information about it - but it'll be wrong and has annoyed me" (Basschat, 2025) It reminds me of an always grumpy old relative of mine that was complaining to me about the tide is 'always doing what you don't want it to do' last time we spoke. Literally complaining about gravity and an effect that means the tide is in just as much as it's out. 1 2 Quote
Lozz196 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 9 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said: Chatting to a friend the other day, back in the 70s his band needed a stand in bassist for a European tour. They auditioned Pino and turned him down. 🙄 If I were the bassist that got the job after that I`d have it printed on a t-shirt - 7 t-shirts in fact - and wear it every day! 2 Quote
SteveXFR Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 18 minutes ago, SumOne said: "I haven't seen the programme, and I haven't got much information about it - but it'll be wrong and has annoyed me" (Basschat, 2025) It reminds me of an always grumpy old relative of mine that was complaining to me about the tide is 'always doing what you don't want it to do' last time we spoke. Literally complaining about gravity and an effect that means the tide is in just as much as it's out. Basschat is GB News for musicians. 2 Quote
cetera Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 6 minutes ago, SteveXFR said: Basschat is GB News for musicians. How VERY dare you?!? 🤣 Quote
Marky L Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 13 hours ago, hiram.k.hackenbacker said: I'd like to say I'm shocked that he's got that wrong 🙄 Drummer? Wrong? Shocked?? 1 Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 14 hours ago, Sparky Mark said: Perhaps Pino was crap back then and your friend's rejection spurred him on to become the player we all revere today. He should feel proud. Well he was several years away from becoming famous! 1 Quote
Woodinblack Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 15 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said: Chatting to a friend the other day, back in the 70s his band needed a stand in bassist for a European tour. They auditioned Pino and turned him down. 🙄 Well, maybe he was no good for the music. I saw Pino with NiN and it really didn't work for me Quote
rushbo Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 hours ago, SumOne said: "I haven't seen the programme, and I haven't got much information about it - but it'll be wrong and has annoyed me" (Basschat, 2025) This. Very much this. Quote
Sparky Mark Posted 57 minutes ago Posted 57 minutes ago 6 hours ago, Marky L said: Drummer? Wrong? Shocked?? ^^This. It's "brave" indeed to repeat a drummer's comment without a little research IME. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.