BigRedX Posted yesterday at 10:46 Posted yesterday at 10:46 But the size and number of drivers in a cab are only part of the overall sound of the cab. Every cab I have ever owned has sounded different. Even when I've owned cabs by different manufacturers that had the same combination of drivers in them they sounded very different. Not surprising really considering that the cabs were all different sizes and the drivers while being the same diameter had different technical specifications. So why do we keep defining the sound of a cab by the number and size of drivers it contains? Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted yesterday at 10:59 Posted yesterday at 10:59 No love for 18" cabs? I used to have one when I started out. Provably why I went to a pair of 2x12 cabs decades before most bassists! Quote
chris_b Posted yesterday at 11:34 Posted yesterday at 11:34 33 minutes ago, Stub Mandrel said: No love for 18" cabs? I used to have one when I started out. Me too. A Vox Foundation. Worst bass sound in the world, by miles. 2 Quote
Bill Fitzmaurice Posted yesterday at 11:42 Posted yesterday at 11:42 54 minutes ago, BigRedX said: So why do we keep defining the sound of a cab by the number and size of drivers it contains? The same reason why far too many define the performance of an amp by watts. 😉 2 Quote
Dan Dare Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago (edited) 9 hours ago, BigRedX said: So why do we keep defining the sound of a cab by the number and size of drivers it contains? Tbf, nobody is really "defining the sound of a cab" by number and size of drivers. Most of us are saying we've enjoyed (or still enjoy) the sound of 15s. That's certainly the case for me. Were I still able to carry and store a large 2x15, I would probably have another. Different strokes for different folks. Edited 23 hours ago by Dan Dare 1 Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 11 hours ago, chris_b said: Me too. A Vox Foundation. Worst bass sound in the world, by miles. Cruel. But fair. 18s don't bring the words 'crisp' or 'detailed' to mind. 1 Quote
chris_b Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 7 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said: Cruel. But fair. 18s don't bring the words 'crisp' or 'detailed' to mind. It sounded like a goose farting in a fog. Even when I was starting out and didn't know anything, I knew that wasn't how I wanted to sound, but I had no money and had to use that cab for about 18 months until I could afford a 412 cab. 1 Quote
Beedster Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 2 minutes ago, chris_b said: It sounded like a goose farting in a fog. Even when I was starting out and didn't know anything, I knew that wasn't how I wanted to sound, but I had no money and had to use that cab for about 18 months until I could afford a 412 cab. I had a similar experience, in the early 80's I assumed I was simply a crap bass player because I sounded nothing like the players I was trying to emulate. Then as the gear got better, it became obvious that yes, I was just a crap bass player after all, albeit one with better gear 3 Quote
Steve Browning Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) I can tell you that a Boogie 2x18 was fine on its own and didn't lack anything in the definition department. I didn't use it on its own at a gig, it supplemented a 2x15 when I was feeling extravagant! Edited 11 hours ago by Steve Browning 1 1 Quote
Downunderwonder Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 22 hours ago, Dan Dare said: technical arguments are irrelevant They might be irrelevant to you. They could be irrelevant to all if you are playing very quietly through your stage rig. That would require excellent monitors for everyone else and a PA doing the job out front. For the average pub band with a vocal only PA the technicalities are VERY relevant to bandmates and audience. 3 Quote
Japhet Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Have had all sorts over the years. 4x10 1x15 2x10 18+2x10. Have been blissfully happy for about 10 years now with a 2x12+tweeter. Quite like the 1x15 in the rehearsal studio but it's difficult to hear when you're right next to it. Quote
W1_Pro Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 22 hours ago, Dan Dare said: If you like the sound of 15s (and don't mind carrying them), the technical arguments are irrelevant, even if they are true Thats the whole quote in context ⬆️. Seems reasonable enough to me. Quote
Beedster Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Downunderwonder said: They might be irrelevant to you. They could be irrelevant to all if you are playing very quietly through your stage rig. That would require excellent monitors for everyone else and a PA doing the job out front. For the average pub band with a vocal only PA the technicalities are VERY relevant to bandmates and audience. I think you're confusing technical and functional. The point in question was that if the cab works for the player - and for most players that includes the player's bands and audiences because, they'll soon find out when it doesn't - then it doesn't mater whether it's a 1x10, 1x12, 1x15 etc. I've had 15s that worked (in my case Mesa) and 15s that didn't (in my case Markbass), it's not the 15-ness that defined the functionality 1 Quote
Downunderwonder Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, Beedster said: it's not the 15-ness that defined the functionality It takes a special 15 to be heard off axis. Most are functionally deficient in the off axis department. 2 Quote
crazycloud Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 21 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said: No love for 18" cabs? Yup. I have a Faital unit ready for a completely OTT 3 way. I wouldn't use one (any 18) on it's own, they need at least a 10 on top. Quote
chyc Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 5 hours ago, Beedster said: I had a similar experience, in the early 80's I assumed I was simply a crap bass player because I sounded nothing like the players I was trying to emulate. Then as the gear got better, it became obvious that yes, I was just a crap bass player after all, albeit one with better gear Don't do yourself down, I'm sure it's that your gear still needs upgrading 1 Quote
chris_b Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 5 hours ago, Beedster said: I had a similar experience, in the early 80's I assumed I was simply a crap bass player because I sounded nothing like the players I was trying to emulate. Then as the gear got better, it became obvious that yes, I was just a crap bass player after all, albeit one with better gear . . . . I know I can get the job done no matter what gear I'm using, but I definitely enjoy it more, and consequentially play better, when the sound is good. Also if you manage to put together a great signal chain, the rest of the band will think it's you playing better!! You gotta tick as many boxes as you can. 1 1 Quote
Bill Fitzmaurice Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 13 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said: 18s don't bring the words 'crisp' or 'detailed' to mind. In general no, but consider Jaco. His Acoustic 361 cab was not only loaded with an 18 but it was also a front loaded folded horn, a design that attenuates upper mids and highs. He didn't get stinging pop and slap highs, but what he got was still mighty good. It's but one more example of why one cannot generalize results based on driver size alone other than dispersion. Quote
msb Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago My first rig was some kind of huge reflex cab and a Marshall hundred watt head. The cab sucked , today I wish I had kept that old head. I auditioned for a touring band , and as I was the only one at the audition I got the spot. Traded a Nikon camera for a Pbass. And I was off. Touring was just the local circuit , around and around , lousy food , cheap hotels , it eventually became a misery and I left. But I continued playing bass. Quote
gjones Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) On 08/05/2025 at 11:59, Stub Mandrel said: No love for 18" cabs? I used to have one when I started out. Provably why I went to a pair of 2x12 cabs decades before most bassists! I owned a 18 inch 16 ohm Orange cab. All I had was a 150 watt trannie, Marshall Bass/Lead head. I could hardly get any noise out of it at all and what I could get was pretty awful. Edited 6 hours ago by gjones Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I'm sitting opposite my homebuilt 50W 4x3 combo and it sounds ok 🤣 Needs a bit more gain in the preamp though. Quote
Beedster Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 7 hours ago, Downunderwonder said: It takes a special 15 to be heard off axis. Most are functionally deficient in the off axis department. ‘Most’? So there are some we’re allowed to use then? Quote
chris_b Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Beedster said: ‘Most’? So there are some we’re allowed to use then? No. It's against the law to use any 15" speakers cabs. . . . health and safety. 1 Quote
TRBboy Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I like 15's 😊 Got a pair of Markbass NY151's recently, and I'm really impressed, they sound tight, deep and punchy, yet still nicely articulate. Speaker diameter doesn't guarantee any particular sort of sound, it's all about the drivers used and the cabinet design. 2 Quote
Reggaebass Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, TRBboy said: I like 15's 😊 Got a pair of Markbass NY151's recently, and I'm really impressed, they sound tight, deep and punchy, yet still nicely articulate. Speaker diameter doesn't guarantee any particular sort of sound, it's all about the drivers used and the cabinet design. That’s what I used for quite a few years and I’ve still got one of them, great cabs , nice deep bass 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.