horrorshowbass Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Good to see Dingwall follow the trail blazed by Ibanez. Quote
Hellzero Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 19 minutes ago, horrorshowbass said: Good to see Dingwall follow the trail blazed by Ibanez. With a latency of 40 years for the both of them... I've been playing mostly headless fretless sixers over around the same period, so Ibanez and Dingwall are a bit late to the party, aren't they. 1 Quote
Woodinblack Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 28 minutes ago, Hellzero said: With a latency of 40 years for the both of them... Hardly, the Ibanez Axestar AXB50 was released in 1985, that was headless. Quote
Hellzero Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 33 minutes ago, Woodinblack said: Hardly, the Ibanez Axestar AXB50 was released in 1985, that was headless. I was waiting for THAT comment. And it was such a success that Ibanez decided to stop the production of headless basses just after for a very, very, very long period. Quote
horrorshowbass Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Lads, this one was too easy. Ibby did do a headless multiscale first I believe... Quote
wavemaker Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I have no horse in this race as I don’t do headless basses any more. I‘d like to correct two points made before, though: I‘ve had Afterburners clocking in at 3.4 kg that were perfectly balanced. I also own one of eight "Afterburner Heavy Solids" / ABHS weighing 5.5 kg and while it certainly is more stone than feather, it feels lighter than most Les Pauls on a strap. Like it or not in terms of its aesthetic - but ergonomically, the AB design is perfect. (I‘ll give you the first few frets being hard to reach if you’re of smaller limb but that’s what the reach reducing pin is for.) Also, Strandberg basses were released in February 2019, not 2007. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.