RAY AGAINST THE MACHINE Posted September 29 Posted September 29 I’ll just wait for the Harley Benton version for £500 in yellow 🙂 1 1 Quote
Bolo Posted September 29 Posted September 29 Stupid. They could make 18 if they only used four strings per bass! 3 Quote
Woodinblack Posted September 29 Posted September 29 2 hours ago, RAY AGAINST THE MACHINE said: I’ll just wait for the Harley Benton version for £500 in yellow 🙂 or the hofner wooden version! 1 Quote
Russ Posted September 29 Posted September 29 On 28/09/2025 at 13:21, Misdee said: Bear in mind that most bass manufacturers have had to acquiesce to the fact that the prevalent trend is for P Basses and retro instruments in general. Kudos to Ned for completely ignoring that with this offering. There's no dressing this bass up as being anything but futuristic and hi-tech. I think that may have been the case maybe 5 years ago or so. You're starting to see a lot more interesting stuff showing up these days - headless and multiscale (and headless multiscale) have taken off in a big way, to the point where almost every major guitar manufacturer (except the dinosaurs like Fender, Gibson, etc) have added them to their ranges. I think Ned has come in with this at the right time. The people who like his NS stuff *really* like it, and are prepared to pay for it, to the point where nothing else will do. 2 Quote
Misdee Posted September 29 Posted September 29 28 minutes ago, Russ said: I think that may have been the case maybe 5 years ago or so. You're starting to see a lot more interesting stuff showing up these days - headless and multiscale (and headless multiscale) have taken off in a big way, to the point where almost every major guitar manufacturer (except the dinosaurs like Fender, Gibson, etc) have added them to their ranges. I think Ned has come in with this at the right time. The people who like his NS stuff *really* like it, and are prepared to pay for it, to the point where nothing else will do. You might well be right; I'm getting too old and confused to understand what young people really want. (That was the basis of my defense in court, anyway.) That whole math rock, new metal thing is unlistenable for me so I don't pay too much attention In terms of sales numbers I have no idea, but traditional designs still seem to proliferate in the mainstream. 1 Quote
tauzero Posted September 30 Posted September 30 3 hours ago, Misdee said: You might well be right; I'm getting too old and confused to understand what young people really want. (That was the basis of my defense in court, anyway.) That whole math rock, new metal thing is unlistenable for me so I don't pay too much attention In terms of sales numbers I have no idea, but traditional designs still seem to proliferate in the mainstream. I do quite a few open mics which have featured bands, and 90% of the bassists have 4-string FSOs. Having had both fan-frets and parallel frets, I prefer the parallel. I also prefer 5-strings to 6-strings (and 4-strings). For those reasons, this doesn't interest me except in the sense that I'd like to see if NS comes up with the CF equivalent of the Hohner B2AV or Spirit XT25 (with a nicer neck). It does look like a better thought out body than the symmetrical cricket bat. 1 Quote
Bagman Posted September 30 Posted September 30 I think the L2 is the best bass guitar design of all time 2 Quote
Russ Posted September 30 Posted September 30 19 hours ago, tauzero said: I do quite a few open mics which have featured bands, and 90% of the bassists have 4-string FSOs. Having had both fan-frets and parallel frets, I prefer the parallel. I also prefer 5-strings to 6-strings (and 4-strings). For those reasons, this doesn't interest me except in the sense that I'd like to see if NS comes up with the CF equivalent of the Hohner B2AV or Spirit XT25 (with a nicer neck). It does look like a better thought out body than the symmetrical cricket bat. The current NS Radius range of basses are rather nice - I was surprised. The higher-end ones have a graphite/maple sandwich neck, but even the cheaper wooden-necked WAV models are really nice and apparently super-stable. They're more a spiritual successor to the 1990s XQ series than the good ol' cricket bat though. Quote
EMG456 Posted October 1 Posted October 1 17 hours ago, Bagman said: I think the L2 is the best bass guitar design of all time 2nd that! For me it was the pinnacle. I've got loads of other more "conventional" basses one way or another but when the time comes, my L2 will be the last to go. That said, I liked this when we first saw it a couple of years ago but not a particular fan of fanned frets or indeed, monorail bridges. 1 Quote
roger Posted October 1 Posted October 1 6 hours ago, EMG456 said: 2nd that! For me it was the pinnacle. I've got loads of other more "conventional" basses one way or another but when the time comes, my L2 will be the last to go. That said, I liked this when we first saw it a couple of years ago but not a particular fan of fanned frets or indeed, monorail bridges. +1 on the L2 I just personally didn’t like the neck, narrow 38mm nut and quite a deep profile (IMO) I read somewhere Ned made it like that on Stanley Clarke’s advice🤷♂️ an absolute design masterpiece, I just sold mine as there’s so many other ‘itch’s to scratch’🤣 Quote
visog Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago Oh wow! Nate Navarro putting it through its paces... What an interesting bass. Sounds great. 3 Quote
BassApprentice Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago You know what, as limited and expensive as it is, I think it's really cool. Status are winding down, Ken Parker just passed away. Wood and screws is all well and good, but we're seeing less innovators so we should appreciate what they are doing just now. Maybe someone else will pickup the carbon fibre/graphite mantle in the near future.... 2 Quote
Bagman Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago On 02/10/2025 at 02:09, EMG456 said: 2nd that! For me it was the pinnacle. I've got loads of other more "conventional" basses one way or another but when the time comes, my L2 will be the last to go. That said, I liked this when we first saw it a couple of years ago but not a particular fan of fanned frets or indeed, monorail bridges. I've yet to play an instrument with fanned frets , I think I understand it's principle but asthetically it's difficult to like Quote
Russ Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, BassApprentice said: You know what, as limited and expensive as it is, I think it's really cool. Status are winding down, Ken Parker just passed away. Wood and screws is all well and good, but we're seeing less innovators so we should appreciate what they are doing just now. Maybe someone else will pickup the carbon fibre/graphite mantle in the near future.... Well, our very own @Kiwi is doing his graphite neck thing, there's Klos, who are making Modulus-esque basses and replacement necks, Modulus and Zon are still going in the US, and the Germans like Bogart and Clover are still offering graphite necks on their instruments. Supposedly Mike from Zoot will soon be joining the graphite club. In terms of using alternative materials, there's also Aristides out of the Netherlands, who make guitars and basses out of something they call Arium. No idea what's in it, it's some kind of reinforced resin. 1 Quote
itu Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Many fibres are more than functional with resin: wood, glass, carbon... even paper (phenolic resin fretboards). Quote
Russ Posted 51 minutes ago Posted 51 minutes ago 21 minutes ago, itu said: Many fibres are more than functional with resin: wood, glass, carbon... even paper (phenolic resin fretboards). Yep, Richlite is basically layered paper infused with resin. So is ebonol. They're very stable though, and do sound suitably "woody". Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.