Yes, they undoubtedly helped me. A lot.
As has been said though, the quality of the teaching has a lot to do with it.
Every lesson would be some area that my teacher (Jon Caulfield) felt needed improving. Then he would show me a good example of what we were looking to acheive/play, and explain any theory behind it. Explain the techniques involved, demonstrate the technique involved, then work at it with me. Pointing out any things i should do differently, or any flaws in my technique as i was learning to play. Then we would usually construct a groove or line, that contained whatever aspect of playing i'd just been working on.
So one week it could be ghost notes. Next could be legato. Next could be constructing a walking bass line. Next could be .... and so on.
It sounds like it was quite regimented. It wasn't though. In general the lessons just followed this path.
The feedback you get from a good lesson cant be replicated from online lessons, and as good as Scotts are (and they are good IMO) a good teacher, face to face will help you more. That why you pay more! Also, a good teacher will be hugely motivating when you see them play as it will open your eyes as to what can potentially be achieved.