ezbass Posted October 26 Posted October 26 Just for reference, I resized these 2 Rics (4003s & 4030) to the same scale, to show the relative pickup positions. The bridge pickup is just about OK (still a little south of where you'd ideally want it), but the neck is way off, as has already been mentioned. Quote
Misdee Posted October 26 Posted October 26 (edited) This whole endeavour by Rickenbacker is just very strange. Where have they got the idea that there is a need and indeed demand for a 30 inch scale bass that is essentially as big as a full-size Rick? It's so weird a project that I could never have imagined it had it not happened. A scaled-down 4003/4001 would have been a sure-fire hit, what with the enduring trend for short scale basses. There isn't going to be overwhelming demand for these 4030 basses, I would predict. Edited October 26 by Misdee 1 Quote
HeadlessBassist Posted October 26 Posted October 26 54 minutes ago, ezbass said: Just for reference, I resized these 2 Rics (4003s & 4030) to the same scale, to show the relative pickup positions. The bridge pickup is just about OK (still a little south of where you'd ideally want it), but the neck is way off, as has already been mentioned. That's fascinating - I had a similar issue with the pickup placement on the original Jason Smith designed Fender Rascal. The pickups were too far over to the left of your playing position, making the bass virtually unplayable on a strap. Rickenbacker have made some very odd choices here... Quote
Woodinblack Posted October 26 Posted October 26 1 hour ago, Misdee said: Where have they got the idea that there is a need and indeed demand for a 30 inch scale bass that is essentially as big as a full-size Rick? It's so weird a project that I could never have imagined it had it not happened. Because it was a custom build made for a specific person (Jesse F. Keeler) who requested it that way and rick built it for him. He was happy for it and they made a few other ones for people. Then people requested a reissue, that is what this is. This is what some people wanted, and they will all sell just fine - it is the rickenbacker way!. Quote
Misdee Posted October 27 Posted October 27 2 hours ago, Woodinblack said: Because it was a custom build made for a specific person (Jesse F. Keeler) who requested it that way and rick built it for him. He was happy for it and they made a few other ones for people. Then people requested a reissue, that is what this is. This is what some people wanted, and they will all sell just fine - it is the rickenbacker way!. Jessie F Keeler?😮 JFK? Why did no one tell me that earlier? Well, that puts a very different complexion on things. Jessie F Keeler! If only I had known. My mistake then, apologies to all concerned.🙂. . I totally get your point a Rickenbacker's eccentric design and marketing philosophies. I'd love for JFK and/or Rickenbacker to explain the ergonomic advantages of this design. Then again, if they weren't a bit Kookie maybe the guitars and basses wouldn't have such a gloriously distinctive sound and look. Few things in this world are as beautiful as a Rickenbacker. I'd love to see Rickenbacker do a faithful reissue of the 4002 rather than (ironically enough) the short scale approximations I've seen. They could have my money for sure. I've seen some really sumptuous one-offs from their custom shop on the internet, too. Sooner or later I'm sure I'll end up pulling the trigger, despite the fact that I should have learnt by now that I can't play on a Rick. I wish I had got one when I first started and couldn't play on any other bass either, so it wouldn't have made any difference. Quote
Woodinblack Posted October 27 Posted October 27 11 hours ago, Misdee said: I totally get your point a Rickenbacker's eccentric design and marketing philosophies. I'd love for JFK and/or Rickenbacker to explain the ergonomic advantages of this design. Well, who is to say there were any - just what some bloke liked 11 hours ago, Misdee said: I'd love to see Rickenbacker do a faithful reissue of the 4002 rather than (ironically enough) the short scale approximations I've seen. Well, the original 4030 had 4002 wings, as apparently they were around spare - but I see why the 4002 was canned - it isn't the prettiest thing, like a 4001 but with the pickups of a 4004 in a different place and a lot of pickguard. Quote
Stag Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) GuitarGuitar now have all 4 different finishes of this in at £3499 (!!!) Doesnt seem like many (if any...?) have shifted from any of the UK dealers? Edited 2 hours ago by Stag Quote
BassApprentice Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I noticed the same in Glasgow. A few weeks ago they had maybe 2 shorties and 2 other Ricks. Now 4 shorties. Quote
Baloney Balderdash Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) As said I really like it both looks and spec wise, but considering I could get a custom made bass made exactly to my preferred specs for that kind of money, and honestly likely at higher quality too, if I ever had that kind of money to spare for a bass, it is highly unlikely I would chose the Rickenbacker. Edited 1 hour ago by Baloney Balderdash Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.