Jump to content
Why become a member? ×
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

BAD DESIGNS ok lets have em,


funkgod
 Share

Recommended Posts

[quote name='zero9' post='1033863' date='Nov 23 2010, 01:41 PM']The double bass. It's too bulky, doesn't stay in tune and needs to be amplified.[/quote]

+1. Great played arco in the massed ranks of a string section, but seriously lacking as a rhythm section instrument when played pizzicato and alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jazz bass "bell" control plates. Never fit flush with the pickguard, despite most certainly being machine cut.

The thing with Fender trying to "modernise"

There are modern innovations, then there is trying to be cool. During the 80's you find the HM bass, nothing really modern about it, the third pickups adds not a lot to the sound, and the finish was dread full, and power jazz bass' too much "trying hard" without really trying. The carbon layer IMO made a difference to the sound and structural integrity to the neck, but the active tone thing was rather pointless.

The thing nowadays is that "vintage" is a cool/modern thing.

Some modern things I do like, on a traditional design. Like control cavities on the back so the front looks more clearer.
The clover jazz copy with the concave front contour looks pretty cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 4004 was an imrpoved version of the 4003, except it has humbuckers, but it doesn't look like a 4003 as it has no scratchplate, sharkfin inlays or binding.

Now the binding I can live without as I prefer the 4003S anyway, plus it has dots instead of those inlays so it probably comes down to the scratchplate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='stingrayPete1977' post='1034225' date='Nov 23 2010, 07:00 PM']Do they have a waiting list just for special orders though? There are plenty hanging around in a lot of shops I have been into.[/quote]

I think any new Rics in stock are likely to have been ordered by the retailer 6 - 12 months ago. Obviously, you can find shops with them in stock, although they're as rare as hens teeth in the East Midlands!

I'm not defending Rics as a good design. The bridge adjustment is hopeless, and the bridge pickup cover simply gets in the way. My point was that when Ric put a decent bridge on the 4004 and did away with the bridge pickup cover it was actually less popular!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='simon1964' post='1033780' date='Nov 23 2010, 12:34 PM']Thing is with Rickenbacker that they have updated their designs to take out the quirks (eg the 4004 bass which has a modern bridge, pickups etc) but then nobody buys them![/quote]

Good point. I actually love my 4001's because they have some quirky and not too clever design features. No harm in a little individuality.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mr. Foxen' post='1035367' date='Nov 24 2010, 05:54 PM']Not being able to make enough is a design flaw. Choosing not to make enough is marketing.[/quote]

Agree with that too. Rightly or wrongly Rickenbacker have made a consious decision not to have cheaper versions of their basses mass produced in the Far East. They're pretty much in a minority of one in doing that amongst major producers - Fender, Gibson, Warwick, G&L, ESP, PRS, Musicman etc all have cheap Far Eastern brands. I'm not knocking those - I own some of them! But Ric's decision to limit production must surely be a consious marketing decision to keep the perceived exclusivity of the product (rather than a design flaw!).

I suspect they could produce thousands of cheaper "Ric Lites" in the Far East if they chose to do so. Presumeably they don't because they want to keep the exclusivity (and margain) on their US stuff.

But as I said several posts ago, I'm not defending Rics as a design. I love them, but I readily accept the bridge, pickups, and lack of countours are as old fashioned and flawed as a Morgan Roadster.

Edited by simon1964
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='simon1964' post='1035385' date='Nov 24 2010, 06:05 PM']But as I said several posts ago, I'm not defending Rics as a design. I love them, but I readily accept the bridge, pickups, and lack of countours are as old fashioned and flawed as a Morgan Roadster.[/quote]

Do you say that because you know Dad makes parts for Morgans? I think the updated Morgan is doing ok though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mr. Foxen' post='1035658' date='Nov 24 2010, 09:46 PM']Do you say that because you know Dad makes parts for Morgans? I think the updated Morgan is doing ok though.[/quote]

LOL - no, I was just using Morgan as an example of a company that produces a fantastic, cool, desirable product which is rooted in what many would say was an old fashioned design. Just like Rickenbacker IMO!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we're all used to it as it is so familiar, but the scratch plate on Rics really irks me - It's ugly utilitarian shape and cheap (looking) plastic. The knobs they use are amongst my least favourite too.
I think the rest of it looks super cool though, but I've never played one. People get nice sounds out of them too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='MoonBassAlpha' post='1035713' date='Nov 24 2010, 10:39 PM']I know we're all used to it as it is so familiar, but the scratch plate on Rics really irks me - It's ugly utilitarian shape and cheap (looking) plastic. The knobs they use are amongst my least favourite too.
I think the rest of it looks super cool though, but I've never played one. People get nice sounds out of them too.[/quote]

It is also a major weak point, they break round the pickup and the control cavity. I'm having some made out of steel, should fix that issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...