I was at a late afternoon pub gig, sparse attendance. Guitarist B.V and singer GF. Every tune guitar boy was retuning his guitar by playing chords of the next number and never really getting it too great before kicking off. I had a fair idea what might be going on so on their break I collared him and got him to play just the octave. Yup. So I taught him how to intonate his guitar with the aid of a screwdriver borrowed from the barman. GF was well pleased.
I do that. It's how I figured out where the problem was with hitting the pedal note with the plucking finger that just landed on it from plucking the last note.
Generally I don't concern myself with which finger I am using to pluck each note.
4/4 100bpm semiquaver isn't fast! It's just this line needs a steady 1 2 pluck to stay on track.
You're saying the player acts as a big antenna into the bass electronics when he isn't connected to them? But when he is connected to them he stops transmission? No comprendez.
Is that a trick question? Have at it.
I am not an electrician. I don't even know why the strings need to be at ( signal?) ground! All I said was ( grounding everything and everything with ) copper foil fixed the lack of (effective) ground at the bridge ( replacing fingers on strings).
I am well aware of Faraday's cage effect. Fingers on strings are not a Faraday cage.
Bernie is poking a banana in his ear.
Burt : ''Earnie, wtf?''
Earnie : ''I am keeping the crocodiles away from Sesame St''
Burt : ''EARNIE, THERE ARE NO CROCODILES ON SESAME ST!!!"
Earnie : ''See, it's working!''.
I think hardware is pretty well correlated from the barely acceptable to pretty good stuff. Schallers breaking is a glaring departure from their historical price reliability correlation tradition. They will pay in the end.
You haven't made a point. You have only reiterated propositions of the OP without stating a position.
Fancy basses appeal to some players who can afford them. So what?