Interesting, but I'd ask is using a square wave to test the fidelity of MP3 encoding a reasonable test ? It was designed to encode music and takes into account the psychoacoustic effects of human hearing, it's not designed to create a perfect copy.
Of course folks could just be trying to make conversation with somebody they know plays music and they're trying to choose a topic with some common ground.
In those situations I try to smile and join in the conversation.
I'm thinking of calling this approach 'politeness'....I've got a feeling it might be quite useful Not sure about the name yet tho.
Makes sense - same name, different authority record.
Much as with any authors with the same name (John Smith(s) anyone ?)...they'll all have unique ways of describing them, usually by appending their date of birth to their name.
In my defence I've never tuned a 5 or 6 or 7(!) stringed bass so I was wary of speaking out of turn.
I'll get on those tabulations immediately tho...I feel I should make amends.
Sorry everyone.
Under 'M' - the authority record for the contributor (what name the item should be indexed under) is 'Michael Schenker Group', assuming you're using MARC21 cataloguing rules in your collection.
In fact, there's only 24...well 23 heinous crimes that I can barely look at and one soothingly correct way
E,A,D,G
A,E,D,G
D,E,A,G
E,D,A,G
A,D,E,G
D,A,E,G
D,A,G,E
A,D,G,E
G,D,A,E
D,G,A,E
A,G,D,E
G,A,D,E
G,E,D,A
E,G,D,A
D,G,E,A
G,D,E,A
E,D,G,A
D,E,G,A
A,E,G,D
E,A,G,D
G,A,E,D
A,G,E,D
E,G,A,D
G,E,A,D