Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Ou7shined

Member
  • Posts

    7,722
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ou7shined

  1. [quote name='cameltoe' post='993582' date='Oct 19 2010, 02:37 PM']Ok, in that case I'd love to see how it all started out, because at times it seemed like a bit of a lynch mob mentality going on here, and I doubt if the original posters intention was to deliberately defraud anyone! Smart.[/quote] The original title listing was regarding a Fender custom bass (which to be fair the Fender bit was then retracted in the first line of the post) with a parts valuation in excess of £1000. Once this was brought into question it was claimed that the parts were Warmoth and was backed up with prices amounting to the proposed sum. After further probing this claim along with the valuations were later retracted and amended to lesser amounts. It's easy to fall into the trap of mistakingly believing that Nick was subject to a "lynching" by only reading the edited posts. He's only guilty of the noob error of bumming up his bass too far... and on a less bass-centric forum it no doubt might have escaped without such scrutiny. Getting to the bottom of this may seem harsh to some but it has been done with civility (and mostly within the bounds of the forum T&Cs) and in his favour, the OP has met it head on. The net result is that we have a truer listing (I still have reservations) which will protect the less well heeled BCers from making a purchase that they might not necessary have made had they been in full possession of the facts and we have all been reminded of where to draw the line regarding flowery FS threads. Is that such a bad thing?
  2. Sell it and buy [url="http://basschat.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=107167&hl"]this[/url].
  3. I do used Spragues myself and will continue to (considering I've still got a few lying about) but I doubt if there really is a substantial difference between them and what you can get down your local Maplin. There is a lot of love for the old oil and paper ones but then again who know if the oil used in them is of the snake variety. They are extremely cheap to buy (although Spragues because of their popularity do go for top dollar) so they are perfect to experiment with. You could even bang a few together on a switch and create your own varitone.
  4. [quote name='dave_bass5' post='993315' date='Oct 19 2010, 11:21 AM']To be honest i agree with you. Thats why ive never done anything like this before. [b]I do find the volume and tone knobs on my CV Jazz are more like on/off switches[/b], especially compared to my old Lakland that had a nice range of control over both.....[/quote] That's a fair enough reason to put new in pots. It wouldn't warrant swapping out the entire loom though.
  5. Personally I don't see the point in "upgrading" the wiring loom unless you specifically have a problem with what's there already - faulty knobs, bad solder joints etc. There is a lot of snake oil involved in the subject. Change the cap by all means to get a different tone but fitting CTS pots in place perfectly functioning original ones is just done for bragging rights... at best the fact they are fitted may be used to influence the spec-heads upon resale, there's certainly no audible benefit. That diagram is fine.
  6. [quote name='Happy Jack' post='992649' date='Oct 18 2010, 07:41 PM']Hmmm - not a way in which I would use the word, but I see where you're coming from.[/quote] Me neither. Translucent to me kind of indicates the ability to see light from both sides. I think "tinted clear-coat" would have sufficed... but then that would require a certain technical understanding of the product combined with a minimal grasp of correct English.
  7. [quote name='Happy Jack' post='992630' date='Oct 18 2010, 07:29 PM'][i][b]"Translucent Green Bling Bass Bridge Cover"[/b][/i] In my normal, slightly pedantic sort of way, could I just ask in what respect an alloy moulding could ever be "translucent"? Do you think he means "fluorescent"? Or perhaps "iridescent"? Or just "really very VERY bright"?[/quote] I suspect it is translucent in that you can see the chrome beneath.
  8. Seen these before. You can get J parts, control plates, knobs etc too. I bet the finish won't last but it would be great for a bit of showboating.
  9. The epitome of doom.
  10. Sold for a kick in the arse off £320.
  11. He certainly has an eye for a bargain.
  12. I'll take that Knockout thingy type PM.
  13. [quote name='redstriper' post='990414' date='Oct 16 2010, 05:53 PM'][b]The biggest difference between them is the sound, everything else is secondary[/b] - they both make good all rounders if you're a good all round player. Here's what you should do: Play each bass, (with the same strings if possible) through the same rig, whilst varying the controls on the instrument and see which sound you prefer. If you're still in doubt, compare the P to the J with only the neck pup and see which bass speaks to your soul. If you still don't know, get a jazz.[/quote] Unless of course you put in an active circuit whereupon it levels the playing field and the biggest difference becomes the physicality of the necks.
  14. [quote name='BurritoBass' post='990389' date='Oct 16 2010, 05:21 PM']This seems to be a duplicate thread of [url="http://basschat.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=106872&hl="]http://basschat.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=106872&hl=[/url] You don't need to post in more than one section, the threads do get picked up. Either of the sections you used is fine[/quote] Bugger. Cheers for heads up Tim.
  15. Generally speaking Ps have slightly fatter necks than Js. Js have a growly tone with the capability of getting more brightness because of the bridge pickup while Ps have a more limited but perfect hollow tone. Adding an active circuit into the mix brings them closer together.... so it may as well be down to the neck.
  16. [quote name='Nick449' post='990255' date='Oct 16 2010, 02:40 PM']... I will take in your remarks though and may end up selling it for parts instead, i'll give it 1 or 2 days, but it would be a shame to see this broken up :/[/quote] I agree it would be a shame to part it out. And you might not actually end up getting all that much extra for the used parts and at least you'd only have one shipping charge if you sell it whole.
  17. [quote name='Beedster' post='990100' date='Oct 16 2010, 12:20 PM']Get it quick whilst it's still made by WD [/quote] C'mon Nick it was funny. A little cheeky for a FS thread yes, but pretty hilarious considering the thread's direction. Regarding your comment about price above (I wouldn't comment unless you did first) yes many production basses will go for 3/4 of their retail price but that will usually be accompanied by an assurance or recognition of construction quality as well as the quality of the parts. In reality this is a bass that has been bolted together by yourself from bought in parts (and to be fair you couldn't even remember where you got them, which leaves the seriousness of the build on shaky ground if you know what I mean) you can't really factor in construction/labour time on that unless you have actually made some sawdust or done the paint yourself. Ok you have drilled some holes but drilling isn't exactly time consuming - and in a build such as this, is often where any inaccuracy leads to trouble too. In all honesty I think you may be approaching it's value here but taking into consideration simple little details like the tuners not being fitted as perfectly as they might be as being a potential indicator of the overall level of craftsmanship, I think once/if you go sub 400 it should sell quite nicely. The big lesson here is you [b]never[/b] get back what you put in from a basic bolt-together project. Off the shelf retail parts are priced as replacements and become less economically viable when used in complete builds. The only time it becomes "worth it" is when you do it for yourself or for the love of it and are aware of the hit you will take on resale. Compound that with the fact tha people will think "Why risk good money on this guy's skills when I could spend the same amount on a well known brand/luthier?" and unless you can prove a good skill level you're taking another hit. It might not be fair in a lot of cases but there you go. Of course if you'd started this thread with less flamboyant claims it might have sold before any of us bass nerds picked up on it.
  18. That's pretty surprising considering it misses the pup. The original pups look interesting though... especially the humbucker. Dimarzio?
  19. [quote name='hillbilly deluxe' post='990037' date='Oct 16 2010, 11:21 AM']The guitar pickup actually sounds ok.....[/quote] What, even the E string?
  20. Haha so many levels of wrong. Guitar pup, 4 string nut and a bridge that's been fitted a couple of clicks further north than it should be. Hang it on the wall and just tell everyone it used to be Saxon's.
  21. [quote name='funky_numba' date='Oct 16 2010, 02:18 AM']Am I missing something.... what is better... a bass with 1 pup or a bass with 2 pups.[/quote] Neither is better. 2 pups will give you more versatility but that's probably not something you should worry about until you are gigging ect.
  22. [quote name='spinynorman' post='989708' date='Oct 15 2010, 10:06 PM']This looks ok, no idea what it is though. [url="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/LOVELY-1970s-FENDER-STYLE-PRECISION-BASS-MADE-JAPAN-/120632456504"]http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/LOVELY-1970s-FENDER-...N-/120632456504[/url] Fragile though, so pickup in London only.[/quote] Ply refin.
  23. [quote name='ElCapitan' post='989566' date='Oct 15 2010, 07:17 PM']It's a lovely looking bass. I hope the doubters are proved wrong. I'll reserve my judgement until we see the photo.[/quote] Are you ready to stick your neck out now?
×
×
  • Create New...