bnt Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 31 minutes ago, itu said: The point is that with the buffered mixing you get the sound of individual pickups, not their electrical interaction. No matter in which position the pots are. I see too many variables in hi-Z blend+vol, and the tone on top of that. EMG has a few circuits of which the cheapest are just pots. But their systems include active mixing, too. Yep - the EMG circuits are comparable to how analog mixers work: buffer / boost weak signals first, then you can mix them with less noise, degradation or signal interaction. The EMG pots are 25kΩ, vs. the 250-500 kΩ used in passive circuits. 1 Quote
tauzero Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 4 hours ago, RhythmJunky said: That was an interesting Christmas present. Was she under the tree or wrapped separately ? It was due to a Christmas card from the drummer. 1 Quote
petecarlton Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 3 hours ago, tauzero said: It was due to a Christmas card from the drummer. More please! 1 Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 12 hours ago, Woodinblack said: the noise be an issue, even with 6" of shielded cable, Ah... but that's what I don't agree with. There are plenty of passive low-z pickups out there used in active basses and they aren't associatedwith noise issues. Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 10 hours ago, itu said: . I see too many variables in hi-Z blend+vol, and the tone on top of that. That makes it seem like you are arguing that less tonal flexibility is better. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.