Jump to content
Why become a member? ×
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Tone, and lacquer


MoonBassAlpha
 Share

Recommended Posts

I stumbled across this the other day.
It is worth reading the whole site for this guy's views and philosophy about what makes stuff sound good and bad.
He is coming from an ultra hi-fi perspective, but there is a little bit about guitars on this page:
[url="http://www.mother-of-tone.com/lacquer.htm"]This page here[/url]

I was wondering if this lack of thick plastic coating is a contributing factor as to why (some) folks like the tone of Warwicks so much.

Also interesting to see the speaker kits, and how simple the (hi-fi) bass box is compared to the designs for decent bass guitar cabs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I got my first Bacchus, an oil finished Standard 5 model, I was stunned by how well it projected sound unplugged. I've picked up a few more Bacchus' (Bacchii?) since, a mix of nitro or oil finished guitars and basses, and to my ears at least they definitely have something extra compared to a lot of the more established and popular brands I've owned. That being said, it's not just the lack of a poly coat which shapes the tone of an instrument, everything has an influence but it is funny when people bang on about maple fretboard vs rosewood fretboard that the effect of the thick poly coating on the maple is rarely taken into consideration. And then there's graphite... :)

If you think of the sound of a P bass and the sound of a Stingray though, can you hear the character of the fretboard wood or do you hear the pickup?

And I'd really like to meet the man who can hear the difference between a wooden pickup cover and a plastic one.

Edited by Doctor J
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that it's just one of many factors that may effect the intruments tone but surely to most decent and well made basses it won't matter that much?

I would never worry personally as the average punter at gigs certainly won't be able to tell the difference :) :)

Edited by jonthebass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='MoonBassAlpha' post='1019843' date='Nov 11 2010, 11:09 AM']What's the finish like on your Warwicks? :)[/quote]
Black High Polish on the fretted.

Acrylic on the Fretless.

:)

[url="http://forum.warwick.de/10-warwick-basses/2050-sound-natural-oil-finish-vs-high-polish.html"]http://forum.warwick.de/10-warwick-basses/...igh-polish.html[/url]

Edited by silddx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mr. Foxen' post='1019905' date='Nov 11 2010, 12:10 PM']Tone is all about keywords: plastic = bad, wood = good, so describe something as 'plastic' makes it sound bad, describing same thing as 'natural' means it sounds 'distinctive'.[/quote]
What about "cellulose"? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='silddx' post='1019914' date='Nov 11 2010, 12:15 PM']What about "cellulose"? :)[/quote]

natural wood lacquer. Cellulose has an actual specific meaning, I'm picking out the words that are used that don't mean anything, except an association with 'good tone'. Is 'tone' even the right word? Should it be 'timbre'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mr. Foxen' post='1019922' date='Nov 11 2010, 12:20 PM']natural wood lacquer. Cellulose has an actual specific meaning, I'm picking out the words that are used that don't mean anything, except an association with 'good tone'. Is 'tone' even the right word? Should it be 'timbre'?[/quote]
Timbre, correct. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pretty much gave up after he used the scientific term "sounds like sh!t" for about the fifth time, because unfortunately the entire article was sounding to me a little to much like one long, gaseous, loose bowel movement.

I hate this pretentious rubbish so much. Pickups, strings, electronics, playing technique, amp, speaker, EQ, room acoustics etc account for 99.9 of what any electric bass or guitar will sound like. I remain unconvinced that even the bridge or nut - unless they're failing to do their job properly - make a discernible difference to what you hear coming out of your loudspeaker.

I suppose a specially trained dog might be able detect whatever influence a bit of wood & a couple of microns of shiny coating have, but it wouldn't be able to describe it too well, so what exactly's left? Good, old fashioned self-delusion.

Jon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Bassassin' post='1019973' date='Nov 11 2010, 12:57 PM']I pretty much gave up after he used the scientific term "sounds like sh!t" for about the fifth time, because unfortunately the entire article was sounding to me a little to much like one long, gaseous, loose bowel movement.

I hate this pretentious rubbish so much. Pickups, strings, electronics, playing technique, amp, speaker, EQ, room acoustics etc account for 99.9 of what any electric bass or guitar will sound like. I remain unconvinced that even the bridge or nut - unless they're failing to do their job properly - make a discernible difference to what you hear coming out of your loudspeaker.

I suppose a specially trained dog might be able detect whatever influence a bit of wood & a couple of microns of shiny coating have, but it wouldn't be able to describe it too well, so what exactly's left? Good, old fashioned self-delusion.

Jon.[/quote]

And I don't see any evidence of before-and-after sound clips :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='silddx' post='1019989' date='Nov 11 2010, 01:07 PM']And I don't see any evidence of before-and-after sound clips :)[/quote]

Seeing as he's an ultra hi-fi boff it doesn't surprise me there's no sound clips on his site , think about it! What would you be listening to those "sound clips" on? Though I would agree, if the difference were that noticable, you might hear it on any old p.o.s.

But back to the original point, what I was trying to get at, without explicitly asking, was if anyone has two similar models of bass, one of which had been stripped, and noticed an appreciable difference.
Or even a bass that had been stripped and sounded (better, different, worse)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='MoonBassAlpha' post='1020037' date='Nov 11 2010, 01:40 PM']Seeing as he's an ultra hi-fi boff it doesn't surprise me there's no sound clips on his site , think about it! What would you be listening to those "sound clips" on? Though I would agree, if the difference were that noticable, you might hear it on any old p.o.s.

But back to the original point, what I was trying to get at, without explicitly asking, was if anyone has two similar models of bass, one of which had been stripped, and noticed an appreciable difference.
Or even a bass that had been stripped and sounded (better, different, worse)?[/quote]
Hello mate,

Your first point. No bass amp and cab is really HiFi. And none of us listens to music on the same kit he listens to his on, or monitors his recordings on.

Second point. The only way to tell is with the same bass, painted, then stripped and compared using lab conditions. The cut of wood on a different bass will make more difference to the timbre of the instrument than the finish, or lack of finish, will in most cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='silddx' post='1020056' date='Nov 11 2010, 01:55 PM']Hello mate,

Your first point. No bass amp and cab is really HiFi. And none of us listens to music on the same kit he listens to his on, or monitors his recordings on.

Second point. The only way to tell is with the same bass, painted, then stripped and compared using lab conditions. The cut of wood on a different bass will make more difference to the timbre of the instrument than the finish, or lack of finish, will in most cases.[/quote]
That's why I put the last line in my previous post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='MoonBassAlpha' post='1020065' date='Nov 11 2010, 02:00 PM']That's why I put the last line in my previous post.[/quote]
But who really would care anyway, except maybe in a lame attept to prove a pointless point. Given that the fundemental tone of an electric instrument when amplified comes from so many factors.

What's really funny to me is when people insist on a natural oiled finish because of the TONE, and then install active electronics :)

Who really gives a toss about micro adjustments to tone of the bass by stripping the paint, when the eq of their amps is in fixed bands and Q, then into a desk with tons of EQ possibilities, the influence of the tonal characteristics of the desk and recording medium, the mastering process, the consumer's equipment, and so on. That's aside from all the other components that go into the core tone of a bass before you f*** it all up with eq and other equipment. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='BurritoBass' post='1020084' date='Nov 11 2010, 02:12 PM']Having stripped two basses I don't think the tonal difference was all that noticeable. You gotta love an expert though :)[/quote]
The main moderator on the Warwick forum did the same. And some other Warwick owners were shocked thinking now that Warwick's natural oil finishes are not there for a better sound, The Sound of Wood! They really don't consider that it's purely for aesthetic reasons borne out of cost, time and effort savings. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...