12stringbassist

XTC

[quote name='cloudburst' timestamp='1355066064' post='1893552'] Which one was it that you were referring to as one of the best bassists of all time? CB [/quote] I was referring to the replacement of John Entwistle (in The Who) with Pino Palladino as being laughable.

Having tried one, I'm inclined to stick with my old faithfull.

Tokai make a couple of brands that aren't labelled Tokai, so they don't get on their website. Rockinbetter is one of them.

Elvis Costello.

Pino Palladino is not the bassist for The Who. I don't know who IS, but getting a mate in to do the job of one of the best bassists of all time is frankly a joke. AS far as The Who are concerned, I've gone from passes to staying at home.

Slade. The Who. Thin Lizzy. Cheap Trick. The Beatles. Queen and whoever. Rockpile.

You know the bigger bands? The ones we have to pay to go see? They are the ones who don't have members who can't be arsed learning songs. We've all had bands at some early stage that rehearse and never gig. Successful bands are the exact opposite - mainly because they have enough drive and focus. My dream is to get another band with three or four people all properly into it.

If chart pop doesn't have real bass guitar on there, then it's the duty of some of us to put that right by making some records that will sell with prominent bass on them.

Looks sweet. Good find!

[quote name='Blademan_98' timestamp='1351023147' post='1846408'] Seeing posts by multi instument players, it got me to thinking....... When do you consider yourself a player? Personally, it is when I can play with my eyes shut. I can do that on a guitar (electric or acoustic) and an electric bass. I play a bit of keys and sometimes even write songs on one - BUT I would never consider myself a keyboard player as I have to watch my hands all the time. I also like to have a hrash on the drums but again I am no drummer I still have a lot to learn and technically I may not be great, but I think thats just part of the journey. How about you? [/quote] You are a bass player when you take on the role in a band. Whether you are a good or serious player is down to how much work you put into it. It is a defined role and if you don't fit the bill - you're not a bass player. I prefer the term bassist myself.

The problem with your band was they said one thing to keep you onboard and keep going but did f*** all to move up a notch. There are two ways of looking at that : 1 - They were happy as they were and didn't want to change - but should have told you so. 2 - They were happy to change, but were too bloody lazy to do anything about it. Not your problem now - onwards and upwards. Best of luck with what you do next.

May as well toss my Gretsch in...

My Custom Shop one-off Thumb NT in gloss walnut My Streamer Chrome Tone - one of the best basses I've ever played.

Yup - it's the worn brown mahogany Traditional model. Weighs a ton, but lovely.

Now that is one attractive bass! Well done!

I got this yesterday. Nice nice nice.

I won my copy in a Record Collector mag comp. Along with Rick Nielsen's book, it's a bible.

I've thought about it, but I can't play the things to save my life. Plus - lugging those things about would stop me doing it even if I was good at it. I admire drummers dedication, setting those things up and then dismantling them, plus all that thumping.

[quote name='Kiwi' timestamp='1350548858' post='1840257'] This is the kind of photo that risks pushing Mr Hall's boundaries and would be most easily managed by banning all photos of anything Rickenbacker shaped. Just sayin'. [/quote] There are 4 genuine Rics in the picture. I'm certainly not offering anything for sale. If John Hall wants to have a dicky fit about the existence of the John Birch bass here that was made in 1976 and the Retrovibe in the last two years, then that's his own affair. He did issue Retovibe / Probass with a cease and desist order on the RV4 and RV5 and Probass complied. If Ric still made a 5-string I'd have one (price-sensibility permitting). The Birch I bought because I couldn't say no to it. It doesn't get out much, as the Rics seem to get all the walkies. I don't think that any forum is, or can reasonably be, or even should be, controlled by John Hall's desires. Even the RRF has an area to discuss copies (though they generally meet with hoots of derision from nearly all concerned). Neither of them is a faker in the true sense, either. A faker is [i]something that can be passed off as the real thing - an exact counterfeit[/i]. The basses are definitely Ric-styled basses, but the designs themselves, while featuring features very similar to copyrighted Ric shapes etc aren't really exact. But no-one with working eyes would think they were Rics! Banning a photo of anything Ric shaped would be discriminatory against all the other makers, so you'd have to ban pics of Rics too. And if Fender got snotty about all the makers who shamelessly nicked their ideas - Fodera, Sandberg, etc etc etc, then we'd have nothing at all to look at. Just sayin'.

THERE ARE TWO IMPOSTERS IN THIS LINE-UP....

Hi, For me the Fender is the better option - better re-sale value and it's not a copy that doesn't do what it sets out to do! The RB isn't a bad bass, but it doesn't sound or play like a Ric. The Fender probably has a better range of sounds, too. The best way to find out is to try them both.

Looking for a working band classic rock, glam , club etc. [url="http://www.ianedmundson.co.uk"]www.ianedmundson.co.uk[/url]

I didn't take it as such, don't worry!

[quote name='Spike Vincent' timestamp='1349553688' post='1827765'] Hold on,you mean a girl actually spoke to a bassist after a gig? [/quote] "Is this the way out?"