When I first discovered jazz I thought it was an incredibly broad church ranging from the Dixie type 20s stuff all the way to the free improv of Peter Brotzmann and Derek Bailey... That it was about both innovation, huge skill [I]and[/I] tradition.
How wrong could I be!
It seems that jazz is only about playing other people's music (or variations of) using the legally-allowed instrumentation. If it doesn't fit into those exact parameters it's no longer "real" jazz, it's some sort of bastardisation, like it's been diluted by rock or funk and become (spits) [I]fusion[/I].
It's as if all the folks who wrote the standards did so in isolation, without having heard any of the melodies or other musical genres of the time.
And here's some Prime Time:
[MEDIA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQmOv3TCUsM[/MEDIA]