Musicman20

My thoughts exactly haha! Big cab big stage. Not sure we can muster the strength or space to lift it every night though

Adjust the EQ...dont cut the mids too much! Ive never had this issue....but I think thats the answer. The EBMM pickups and preamp are expensive anyway, id never swap them out! Another idea. For more thump, whack some flats on it.

I do have to point out how MB tried to cram EVERYTHING into the F500, and the controls are very strange to use. It didnt have the feel of the LM3 at all to my hands. It felt a little bit delicate. The Gain on the RH450 is accessed normally, then if you press shift, the compressor can be tweaked. I do know that compression can be important, but I must admit, the RH450 compressor works very very well indeed. Its not hugely complex, but they know how work these things from their past efforts in effects and studio gear. The LM3 is simple to use, but the RH450 is far superior to most other amps that try to add extra features. Why? Because for once, they all actually work damn well, and arent just there for fun. Ive never had a semi-parametric EQ, and it works very well and fluid on this amp. Again, I like MB and TC, so Im not fussed.

I have changed a lot of gear the past year or two. I have finally got the amps that really work for me, and Im not gambling on anymore for a long time. Basses? Almost there. Fender J, then Im done for a few years.

Buy ALL cables from OBBM, seriously good and no high prices

Thanks for the input. Im still undecided

[quote name='Bilbo' post='1129320' date='Feb 16 2011, 10:19 AM']I think there is an argument that some players (not all by any means) are trying to 'buy' talent and, rather than working on legitimate, tried and tested methods of musical learning, try and adress their shortcomings by buying gear. I heard even Guy Pratt talking about a bass with a 'fast neck'. I don't care how fast the neck is, if a player has no musical knolwedge and lacks core competences like time etc, a 'fast neck' ain't going to solve the problem. I make no secret of the fact that most of the talk on here about gear is irrelevant nonsense - there is a thread on here about the best material to make a nut out of (walnut, obviously). What possible difference can that make to anything? I get that you get more sustain from this or that material but how many times a night do you hit a note that sustains long enough for that to matter? In fact, you are as likely to NOT want it to sustain. I think its all smoke and mirrors. I can't tell the difference in sound between a Jazz and a Precision or a Ken Smith or a Fodera. I [i]can[/i] tell the difference between a Dorian minor and a Phrygian minor. [i]That[/i] matters. But an ebony vs plastic nut? As important as the colour of your lead, methinks.[/quote] Great post. I need to play more.

I think Carvin need more marketing here in the UK. I barely hear a thing about them.

I used the same setup for years. I still think you cant beat an lead sled solid state or full tube amp for sheer power. Something seems different to me with the smaller amps, but the RH450 definitely gets super close. Now Ive started it, Ive got a little bit addicted to trying new amps/cabs. I have however, hit a very nice collection, and thats it for now. Im spending on the basses I have coming in and thats it for a good year or so. Part of it is 'check out this new amp, its better than your old one', then you get it, and it isnt. But some of them are stunning....it just takes time to find the one(s) that work for you.

[quote name='Raggy' post='1129280' date='Feb 16 2011, 09:45 AM']Mrs Raggy got me one of these for xmas. [attachment=72342:101204.jpg] I likes it [/quote] Mine is very similar, and its comfy to! My missus got me it last March as a birthday present. Now she wants a few for the house!

I think they have a new line due out, and we will all love them again! I nearly sold my LM3 this week, but due to financial issues, I am not 'upgrading it', and to be honest, its the one amp I use if I need a totally clean and sleek sound with crisp high end. Nice kit, and I like the fact its all made in Italy and not out sourced. The website is currently down...for an update.

[quote name='cocco' post='1129218' date='Feb 16 2011, 08:29 AM']I'd miss the space you get with the single pickup I think. And what's the point in more tones when the one you want is the basic one that every ray does?[/quote] Ive not played the HH, but I have a HS, and believe me the extra tones are very nice. The classic Ray tone is there, and 4 other great ones! Weirdly enough my favourite is one I never expected, and the different single coil tones are like a Jazz or a P bass (single coil Jazz bridge or single coil P) with more sonic punch. You dont lose a lot of room with the HS, and IMO its a good 'inbetween' setup. Cool H sounds like a normal Ray, and more.

[quote name='niceguyhomer' post='1128825' date='Feb 15 2011, 08:07 PM']I'm a habitual MB user and currently have an LM Tube 500 which is very good. I quite fancy a GB Streamliner for some extra headroom but after all the hoohaa on Talkbass I'm going to sit back and watch for a while.[/quote] This is my stance. Im a bit miffed about the problems they have had....I dont want to take the plunge and they release another like GK did with the MB.

Im tempted to change my order to a HH, just because the upcharge isnt that much and you get 100% the classic Ray tone plus more! I prefer rosewood myself, but thats me

I think the current plan is another 4x10 and a Terror Bass, for now. Thats a lighter amp for when we are space saving, and a cab that can cover most gigs and be added to my 4x10 for a modular 8x10.

I've never liked the style of them...ever. Reminds me too much of the 80s over slapped/synthetic sounding tones.

MB is great dont get me wrong, but the micro amp market has exploded recently. Believe me, the TC amp is incredible. It takes a lot to impress me amp wise, but they have nailed the 'modern SVT in a small box'.

First Bass Owned: Encore P Bass copy 'Go To' Bass: American Standard Fender Precision 'Your' Bass: EBMM Stingray (2 or 3 EQ)

The Classic is apparently the same sound, but here are the features the RH have as extra: Very functional tuner Ability to use the excellent pedal Semi parametric EQ Ability to store 3 different sounds (virtually everything) and recall them quickly Headphone/aux in for practicing (I use this all the time) Digital output on rear for recording They both sound great, but the RH features make it for me.

Tort;)

How loud do the SP212s get when they are together? Anyone tried this?

[quote name='JTUK' post='1125962' date='Feb 13 2011, 02:12 PM']Has to be the 8x10 IF you know what the stages are going to be like, ie a certain standard and size and indeed the trucking plus access in to the stage. For a mini stage gig you'll need something that will stack to around chest height, minimum, IME..if that is 2 SP212 then that might work..but don't stack them vertically, that is such a terrible look..and this might count in this situation.[/quote] Good points.

I was thinking that. Get one more 4x10 and tour with that, use my other one with it for big shows. I reckon a TB would be a great head for this kind of thing.

For £60 delivered brand new it's a total bargain. I needed a cheap thrasher and it works a treat!