fretmeister

[quote name='Cuzzie' timestamp='1506494793' post='3379062'] Bigwan I think you are right, but if you can do it and people buy into it, why not?! I too had an M900 head, clean circuit s very good and intuitive, I see they have taken away the frequency selection points for the 500, it is a real shame that they do not push the clean as much as they do the dirt so people know. The whole marketing campaign aid 4 announcements for September, shock horror, it's a mini version of a pedal less than a year old, 2 Cabs (I would put cabs as 1) and a 500w head which new is more expensive than a second hand 900 which you can flip a switch to attenuate anddecrease the wattage from 900 and soncoild use with a One10 anyway. Only addition is the headphone jack and a DI unaffected by master volume Also in true Apple fashion, extras are optional and have to be purchased such as the footswitch, that's a bit naughty [/quote] Frequency buttons are there - but only 2 options per, rather than 3

I must admit I rarely take mine out (rack and controller) but that's just because I'm currently playing in an educational trust group with a load of ensembles and room changes. I'm not setting up and breaking down 6 times on a saturday morning! So I take bass, amp, cab, and a compressor.

That is lovely. Would be my perfect YOB bass. I'm very jealous.

Maybe not. I'll give you £10 for it. I could do with a spare!

IIRC Mark has stopped ordering Lull basses too. Maybe with the exchange rate issues it's just not worth bringing them in anymore?

Have you tried it in the loop? For some compressors I find putting them in the loop allows the full dynamic interaction with the preamp, but then applies the magic after the preamp to control the levels going into the power section.

Here: http://basschat.co.uk/topic/254344-the-official-maruszczyk-club/page__pid__3376521__st__2100#entry3376521

There is a MASSIVE thread in the Bass section.

I don't know what environments the OP is playing in - but I'm using a 300W Tecamp Puma into a single BF One10 with a big band with over enthusiastic drummers and brass players. I have a second One10 but I don't often have to use it. A single one is plenty loud enough.

I'm using an Aguilar 60s model and it's lovely. Nice and balanced across the strings. Vintagey when played gently, clanky when digging in.

£22 + delivery for a single string. Ye gods. That is taking the piss on a monumental scale.

Pub rock crap or Coldplay?

[quote name='lowdown' timestamp='1505931928' post='3375347'] As my post above, my wife was sent a letter of an intended claim in court before the IC settled on her behalf. So in the case of my wife/Duo, it was worth having the Insurance. It all got quite complicated, because the claim was against my wife's duo. club owner and the agent. Not sure why the agent, he had nothing to do with it, other than supply the act. The club owner was another matter, believe it or not, he had no PLI, so I am not sure what went on there (or that outcome) because the claims company decided he was liable as well, unless that was just some kind of threat in an attempt to get more money ? [attachment=254034:jpg-to-pdf.pdf] My PL insurance is through the MU. I don't know if it's any good because I have never needed to use it. [url="https://www.musiciansunion.org.uk/Home/Advice/Your-Career/Protection/Public-Liability-Insurance"]https://www.musician...ility-Insurance[/url] [/quote] They try and get the court to confirm everyone is liable. It doesn't mean more money as that stays the same no matter how many defendants there are. But it allows collection from all or 1 - it's called jointly and severally liability. It means there is more than one wallet to extract the compensation from.

I need a Low B but I can't seem to find anywhere that will sell singles. Any ideas? ta

[quote name='Dad3353' timestamp='1505927958' post='3375320'] But you only know if it works if you, or someone you trust, has successfully used it. That's what the original question was. It's no use paying for 'peace of mind' if, when push comes to shove, the 'insurers' wriggle out of the claim and you're left hung out to dry. Yes, insurance is worthwhile, as long as it does actually insure. How many folks have paid for insured shipping, only to have claims turned down for whatever reason..? The proof would be if someone could show that it did, in fact, work for them. That's what was asked. [/quote] Fair point. Mine is part of my membership with Equity. I know others who have successfully used that. I'm probably fortunate that I haven't needed to use it - I pay an enhanced amount because I also perform magic with pyrotechnics.

The compensation amounts have to fall within a bracket - they are published in the Judicial College Guide for Personal Injury Damages. So you can't claim £25,000 for a scratch, and an insurer can't offer you £50 for losing an eye either. Loss of earnings has to be proved with pay slips or accountancy records. Future losses are more speculative but there is a formula that is followed. But - before any of that happens, liability (fault) has to be established first, and medical experts have to confirm not only that the injury is real, but that the injury is consistent with the initial event. Amusingly - the no-win no-fee Claims Management Companies (they are not lawyers) exist because the insurance industry wanted them to be set up - because the insurers could then sell policyholder information to them. And they did, and made billions from it. The lawyer actually doing the work would then pay a fee for a referral. That fee was payable even if the claim was a pile of sh*t and wasn't worth running. Fortunately referral fees paid by or to lawyers have now been banned. But only last week the government again voted against cold calling by Claims Management Companies. I have no idea why - unless a few MPs have shares in them somewhere.

Of course it is. And the insurer will do their best to make sure their own customer doesn't have to pay out. That includes shifting the blame. Their resources are enormous. Then if they have to pay out they'll try to pay out the least possible to protect their shareholders.

[quote name='SH73' timestamp='1505915390' post='3375184'] Understand but what length do claimants go to. Looks like a pub band is mostly for fun but all the cost us it worth it financially? [/quote] Depends on the injury. How far would YOU go if because of someone else your wrist was broken and you couldn't work for 2 months? Could you still pay your rent or mortgage if you only got Stat Sick pay for 2 months? PLI is dirt cheap because the risk is low. Or join the MU - then if a landlord refuses to pay you, they'll get the money out of them. You get the use of their lawyers included in the membership fee.

[quote name='SH73' timestamp='1505914729' post='3375177'] I am aware that in this day and age people like suing and making claims but why on earth would you need a PLI? Isn't that what the landlord should cover along other licensing regulations? I understand the tripping hazards etc etc. [/quote] Because you are a separate entity to the landlord. In other words if a customer is hurt they are going to blame you in any way they can so they don't have to claim on their insurance. And even if it is just a trip that for example causes a broken wrist - you are going to be paying out a good £10,000 for injury, loss of earnings, any private treatment expenses and the legal fees. If you haven'g got insurance you'll also be paying your own lawyer to make sure the claim was a valid one in the first place. Trips, electrocutions with your gear, singer throwing something into the crowd, PA stack falling on someone etc etc. None of that is the landlords fault - and even if it was - he will try to shift the blame to you.

I've never needed my house insurance but I'm still going to buy it.