Dad3353

Being some four decades their senior, it might appear to be a bit cheeky. But that's my deaf side, just like the other, so I'd reply 'Nearly three o'clock; time for another 'comfort break'.

Ponce. ...

Anything Trump-related has its place in the 'Bad Jokes' section.

Do drugs make you a what..? Whatever, man; leave that sh** for serious talk over a spliff, not here where some of us are trying to concentrate. Now then; what was I saying..? Ah yes. The question of... What question..? No, man, it all comes down to the question of whether drugs make someone play better, presumably referring to playing a sport or game, a complex one that requires us to consider various factors. Performance enhancement in sports is a topic surrounded by ethical debates and regulations, and the term "better" is subjective and can refer to different aspects of performance. Firstly, let's differentiate between types of drugs: 1. Performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs): These are substances that are specifically designed to improve athletic performance. They can include anabolic steroids, human growth hormone, erythropoietin (EPO), and various other stimulants. While some PEDs might provide a temporary or artificial boost in certain physical aspects like strength or endurance, they come with significant health risks and are typically banned in professional sports. The use of PEDs can lead to unfair advantages, which is why they are often vilified and regulated. 2. Recreational or cognitive-enhancing drugs: These might include substances like marijuana, alcohol, or certain prescription medications used off-label for performance enhancement. The effects of these drugs on performance can be varied and unpredictable. Some may claim to improve focus or reduce anxiety, but they can also impair coordination, judgment, and decision-making. Now, let's consider the factors that might influence the relationship between drugs and performance: - Physical effects: Some drugs may increase physical capabilities such as strength or endurance, but they often come with risks such as increased heart rate, blood pressure, and potential for injury due to overexertion. - Psychological effects: Drugs can alter a person's mental state, which might affect their performance in a game or sport. For instance, they might reduce anxiety or pain perception, leading to increased risk-taking or playing through an injury. - Legal and ethical considerations: The use of banned substances can result in disqualification, suspension, or even a lifetime ban from competitive sports, which can significantly harm an athlete's career. - Long-term health: The long-term use of certain drugs can lead to severe health issues, including organ damage, addiction, and mental health problems. - Consistency and skill development: Athletes and players generally achieve peak performance through consistent training, good nutrition, and rest. Reliance on drugs might overshadow the importance of these fundamental elements. In conclusion, while certain substances might offer temporary or specific performance benefits, they often come with substantial risks to health and career. Moreover, the concept of playing "better" extends beyond just the physical aspect; it includes fair play, adherence to rules, and the holistic development of skills and strategy. Therefore, it's not as straightforward as saying drugs universally make someone play better. In most cases, especially in professional settings, the use of drugs is discouraged and often illegal, as it undermines the integrity of the sport and can lead to negative health outcomes. The safest and most sustainable way to improve performance is through dedicated training, proper nutrition, and rest. ... or something.

I got mine, but couldn't find my glasses to read it.

Well, I tried the experiment, plugging my Verithin into the Fender Bassman Export 50 into the HH folded horn 2x15. Sitting close by, with the volume of the amp at 9 o'clock, I can play, but only have to lean forward to get controllable feedback, mostly from the 'A' anywhere on the neck. I had plugged in through my Boss Fender Deluxe pedal, which has level and gain controls. Setting the level to match dry/wet, once I start upping the gain, it becomes pretty much uncontrollable. The 'A's, obviously, but just about everywhere on the neck sets off deep, unmusical feedback. I couldn't get any gain setting which brought overdrive of any kind, as it would start howling and honking first. I couldn't play even a basic riff with that racket going on. I also have a germanium twin Big Muff, but a didn't dare to plug into that, as it has gain and distortion in spades, even with my guitars, so... This is not a comparison with the Casady bass, of course, but I can now state that which I hitherto didn't know : my semi-acoustic bass doesn't take well, at all, to 'drive'. I don't know if this helps, but at least I've learned something today.

OK, thanks for that; I understand better what the problem is. Jack Casady is at the top of my favourite bass players, and, one day, I'll be able to afford his signature Epiphone. It has a rather unique pick-up set-up, with an impedance-changer for getting different tones with different amps and consoles. I would guess that the impedance of the bass is not working well with the impedance of the pedal. Does this effect change when rotating the impedance control, or is it at every setting..? My 'go-to' bass is a Hofner Verithin, as acoustic an electric bass as it's possible to find, and it is very delicate when it comes to feedback. Personally, I like this, as I can approach the cab (Fender Bassman valve amp into Fender Bassman 2x15...) and 'play' the resulting tones. It's true that I never use pedals, so I've never used an OD signal; I would imagine that, being hollow, it would howl like a banshee at the slightest provocation. We live isolated in the countryside, so I'll try it out to see what happens, though. If you open a window, you might be able to hear it from where you are..! I'll report back...

Any chance of a description of the issue..?

When the nurse stops wheeling you onto the stage.

You don't state which model of amp, but the spec for all of them gives minimum speaker impedance as 4 Ohm, so two 8 Ohm cabs in parallel would be OK. If either cab has 'daisy-chain' sockets, they simplify cabling; otherwise you will need an Y-speakon cable or a 'splitter' box to be able to connect it all together. There would be no problem for the amp, connecting both cabs in parallel at the same time.

@Sarah BRM... Good evening, Sarah... Just a short word that may help a little when using this Forum. You can bring your posts to the attention of any Member by preceding the Forum name with an arobas. Continue to type the User name and a drop-down list will fill up with Members with that name. You can then choose the one required from that list; it will be seen on-screen in orange, like your own User name above ^^. This astuce will bring the post to the attention of that User, making sure that he/she sees it. Try it..? Hope this helps; meanwhile... Have a great day. Douglas

Here's a screenshot I've just taken, minutes later... ? ? ?

What is the custom option that you require..?

Is their offer of a month's trial not enough to tip the balance..? At worst, it would cost the return courrier (£40, I believe...); worth considering..?

Maybe your choice of castanets as your solo instrument made things harder to sell..? ...

Yes, I would confirm 'Ignition', with the centre block. Slightly heavier than the 'full-fat' 500/1 (but still very light indeed...), and with a different tonal characteristic played acoustically, but an excellent bass nevertheless, far more versatile than they are usually given credit for. Not ideal for 'slap', really, but is that a Bad Thing..?

Ok, I'll shut up, then, if that's OK with you. Offending post edited; you win.

Edit : Overly-vocal comment removed, as apparently being unwelcome.

Mmm... Tea...