velvetkevorkian

[quote name='Beedster' post='631614' date='Oct 20 2009, 06:20 PM']I tried to play 'fretless lines' for months with no luck. Then I took my fretless to a rehearsal and simply played my usual fretted lines albeit with frets. That's how I learned fretless technique and intonation. Haven't looked back (or used frets) since. Good luck Chris[/quote] +1

Ooh tempting... Do you have the rest of the lineup in place?

Meshuggah really do it for me.

The consensus seems to be that they're not really worth using in the UK as the grid here is relatively stable. Seems to be more of a necessity elsewhere, like the US for example where the voltage coming in can vary more. As ever, YMMV.

I saw Edgar Meyer play with the Scottish Ensemble (I think) about a year ago- truly remarkable playing. He does things on DB I didn't think were possible.

[quote name='Faithless' post='628601' date='Oct 17 2009, 11:40 AM']I've got almost all the sheets with chords and stuff, and, here's the interesting thing.. As you may know, a lotta gospel music comes 'from' such keys like Eb, and other keys that have even 6 flats (Gb/F#).. So, as I know, gospel bassists solve this problem by detuning the bass half-step. But the problem is, that there are few tunes, where A part goes in 'ordinary' [b]Gb[/b], but the B Part goes from [b]C[/b], you know what I'm sayin'? So, if tune my bass to Eb, in a few tunes I'll face such 'strange' chords, like C#, E# and such.. I'm not saying, that I'm not familiar with them, but, it may feel a bit 'unpleasant'.. What do you, guys, do with 'gospel bass' tuning? [/quote] I wouldn't detune if I can avoid it. Having to transpose it all an extra half step is going to cause more trouble than playing it as its written, IMO. Its an extra complication that will just get in the way of what you're playing.

I looked at a piece by Brian Ferneyhough at uni that was in 4/12.

Yeah, that was my face after I listened to the clip

[quote name='umph' post='627498' date='Oct 16 2009, 12:33 AM']got a clip up of a feedback looper up on my site if you wanna hear what one does with a distortion in it.[/quote]

From Pentode's link- that's freakin' awesome.

Shred-tastic. I thought that was amazing.

[quote name='lemmywinks' post='625913' date='Oct 14 2009, 12:40 PM']Surely that's part of the fun of playing bass though? Trying new stuff out to see if you like it, if it can add something to your sound?[/quote] I think this is where the difference is- a lot of people like (or think they like?) chopping and changing gear, whereas for Bilbo its all about the music, and the gear is very much secondary to that. To you (and a lot of other people) that is part of the fun but not necessarily everyone.

The compressor is getting a lot of love over on T*lkb*ss.

[quote name='Faithless' post='623711' date='Oct 12 2009, 08:22 AM']Am I missing anything here?[/quote] Gospel= typically music of faith Faithless= typically without faith Just slightly ironic, nothing personal

Coooooooool.

I prefer a hand held one, since I don't have effects I use live a pedal would be a PITA, more expensive and would be unlikely to offer audibly better tuning. I certainly wouldn't waste a rack space on one.

Off topic, but did you buy your Professor from Upton directly, Bassace? Every so often I fond myself on their site admiring them

1) What kind of maintenance do you carry out on your instruments at home/gigs? Nothing at gigs. At home I'll do action tweaks including truss rod, the occasional home-brew fret dress and a bit of cack-handed soldering. 2) What position is it easiest to have the instrument in for these actions? (vertical, horizontal, at an angle?) I generally lie the bass flat on a carpeted floor with a pillow to support the neck. 3) Are there any tasks you currently carry out where you find it hard to securely orientate the instrument in an ideal working position? Not that I can think of.

Try [url="http://earachenews.blogspot.com/2009/10/evile-statement-mike-alexander.html"]here[/url]. Very sad news

[quote name='Spoombung' post='619087' date='Oct 6 2009, 10:17 PM']Oh, I can't help it now, you've got me going. The Wal website looks like some sort of Ikea/Habitat generic abomination made by a team of 6th formers on a Dreamweaver course. There's tiny little pictures that you click on ... only to bring up more tiny pictures. Their website puts me off ordering a new Wal even more than the actual price.[/quote] From their website: "We design with the following browsers in mind: Internet Explorer 5+, Netscape 6+, and Mozilla 1+. This covers just about the entire range of browsers currently in use out there."