[quote name='Eight' post='659636' date='Nov 19 2009, 08:52 PM']He could write it exactly how *he* wanted it played if he knew his onions, and the readers were used to fairly complicated scores (since to write down every detail and performance direction could result in something quite hideous to look at it).
My gut feeling is that there wouldn't be many people capable of scoring every detail so well that it sounded natural (groovey?) if played dot to dot by a band. But it's conceptually possible - you'd need very small writing and a lot of paper. [/quote]
I agree with this- it's theoretically possible but would be a total pain in the ass to execute. Its a similar situation with making programmed drums sound like a real drummer- when it comes down to it its just very fine subdivisions if you want to have it played, say, slightly in front of the beat (or whatever).
All written music requires some interpretation at some point- in an orchestra its easy to do as long as everyone watches the conductor. You can get a similar effect by taking a midi version of a piano piece, for example, and feeding it into a sequencer and a top notch piano VST. You will then get the notes at the right time in the right order, but you would have to spend much longer tweaking every single bit of MIDI to get it to sound like a real person playing- the small dynamic variations, the slight tempo differences and so on.
edit- no good reading musician will [i]only[/i] look at the chart- they will listen to what's going on and use what they know of the idiom they're playing in, and that will [i]inform [/i] how they interpret the written notes.