Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Muppet

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    2,122
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Muppet

  1. [quote name='Russ' post='14745' date='Jun 9 2007, 07:01 PM']As someone who's previously owned both, personally, I'd go with the Ampeg. The ABM is a nice head, plenty of power and lots of adjustability (although I found the sub-harmoniser a bit useless) but, overall, a little clean and characterless for my tastes, even with the valve drive dialled way up. If you're going from an all-valve Ampeg head, you'll notice far more of a difference in character between the ABM and the SVT-3. The SVT-3 has 90% of the all-valve Ampeg tone (including that lovely fizzy midrange and huge low-end punch) for half the cost and a quarter of the weight![/quote] The best sound I have ever achieved at a gig was through a 3PRO. I hadn't played through an ABM for ages (not since the first EVO came out) until Wednesday night when I did and the sound was very unpleasant to my ears - very muddy with little definition and no true valve sound. If it's a straight choice then I'd go Ampeg also.
  2. [quote name='Rumble' post='14297' date='Jun 8 2007, 05:30 PM']Have a look at this... [url="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/BASS-GUITAR-Fender-Precision-Bass-August-13th-1966_W0QQitemZ280122888772QQihZ018QQcategoryZ4713QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem"]http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/BASS-GUITAR-Fender-P...1QQcmdZViewItem[/url] I may be off the mark with this, but it smells a little bit fishy. For a start I've checked on Fender and it says that a 1966 bass should have a 100 000 or 200 000 serial number. Is this another dodgy Fender on e-bay?[/quote] You're so on the mark that it's already being discussed [url="http://basschat.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=1315"]here[/url]
  3. [quote name='Mr Cougar' post='14174' date='Jun 8 2007, 01:26 PM']Who the hell is going to pay £375 for a MIM P-Bass?![/quote] My point entirely !
  4. [quote name='Happy Jack' post='14138' date='Jun 8 2007, 12:45 PM']While you're at it, have a look at ... [url="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Fender-Precision-Bass-RARE-In-White_W0QQitemZ120128802229QQihZ002QQcategoryZ4713QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem"]http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Fender-Precision-Bas...1QQcmdZViewItem[/url] [/quote] Now't wrong with that apart from being £150 over-priced.
  5. I owned one a few years back. I thought it was excellent. Great sound, to say the least. A lot of Musicmasters are used as recording tools rather than for live use - don't know if that's because of the image possibly. I wouldn't say it's any easier to play than a regular bass unless you have small hands. The neck width is quite wide for a small bass and mine struggled to stay in tune. I'd not buy one as a main bass, nor even as a back-up, but if I had spare cash and was wanting to add to a collection or was doing a lot of studio recording then I'd certainly consider one.
  6. [quote name='Mr Cougar' post='13568' date='Jun 7 2007, 01:10 PM']As far as the neck width goes I also have stubby hands - welcome to the club Muppet!- I agree that there isn't much difference but surely a thiner neck is always gonna be easier for say, a small handed beginer than a fat old P bass or stingray neck. Unless your fingers are so fat the strings are too close together![/quote] I think it's all to do with playing style. I come across a lot of players who prefer a jazz neck because they anchor their thumb over the top edge of the fingerboard when playing which limits the reach of their fingers. Switching to a style where your thumb is lightly anchored in the centre of the neck means that wider necks such as the Precision are no problem to play. Often it's ex guitarists who struggle with this as they've been used to muting lower strings with their thumb.
  7. [quote name='Mr Cougar' post='13324' date='Jun 6 2007, 09:52 PM']That said they aren't too versatile, they have a wide-ish neck which makes them a bit harder to play than a Jazz. but I don't have one cos Stingers are better at rock[/quote] I am assuming that these are your opinions and not fact! Wide neck does not equal hard to play and they are no harder to play than a Jazz - it just means playing with a slightly different technique. I find them very easy to play and I have quite small stubby hands.... and as for Stingrays being better for rock, well that's a pretty sweeping statement and I'm sure that some of the classic rock players as mentioned above might disagree!
  8. Look at that headstock. I'm asure I've seen that logo before........
  9. [quote name='Thunder Fingers' post='11757' date='Jun 4 2007, 11:56 AM']I must say my P bass (wich, by serial and logo is a 75, but by neck stamp says it is a 77) is a solid and very good, and working bass. i dont realy have any quality issues with it. But again, as its rumored, these "J.Torres" basses and guitars seems to have a higher status than thoose marked by other controllers..[/quote] I have a S '79 Precision and also a Torres marked sienna burst '83 and there is a marked difference in quality - the 83 being much better (and lighter than any other P bass that I have).
  10. Sultans of Swing - oh yes!
  11. It's quite a common occurence and you'll even experience it (albeit to a lesser extent) with high end systems. I find that on my system a tiny bit of both bottom and top end gets lost if I listen very carefully. Most of us get satisfactory results by altering the amps eq to suit.
  12. [quote name='metaltime' post='10676' date='Jun 1 2007, 06:01 PM']took everyones advice and went with obbm i have ordered a bass to amp cable with one of those mute guys and a speaker to amp cable so i will let you no what i think wen i get them but i dont think i will be disapointed[/quote] Ah the Neutrik muting jacks! Yup I have some of them. Excellent, especially when attached to Van Damme cable that Dave uses.
  13. Ah that's what you were after - cool. I hope it works for you as it seems a touch expensive!
  14. Pretenders, Blondie etc? (do you have a female singer?)
  15. Just had a closer look - seems like there's no gold weave.
  16. or have a look on [url="http://www.tube-town.net/ttstore/index.php/cat/c120_Grillcloth.html/XTCsid/ef9f5b39e53b6542d079844fada33427"]this[/url] page?
  17. As Dood says, you'll not get a better quality of product and service than OBBM. You name it, Dave'll make it to your exact specifications.
  18. To confuse matters slightly, we did a charity all dayer on Monday and the bass player from another band was using a Nemesis 2x10 combo with a 75 reissue Jazz bass and the sound was amazing. I was very impressed and asked the sound engineer whether the bass was DI'd to the PA before the amp but this was not the case - all the sound was from the amp. I'm looking around for one now!
  19. Muppet

    obbm's feedback

    Another post in praise from me. Dave made me a very specific cable for my wireless system and it is soo much better than the original. Delivery and service, as usual, cannot be faulted. Cheers Steve
  20. Muppet

    Post counts

    [quote name='dood' post='4183' date='May 22 2007, 08:15 AM']Yeh! I've been singled out you evil people!! ;o) lol lol.. Actually, since it has caused a stir.. and frankly there is NO WAY that anyone could have made that many posts in such a short time on this forum,[/quote] Keep up dood old bean, you need to making one post every 3.5 minutes to maintain your average.
  21. Great news Shaun - what was the quick fix - is it something that would be useful to know?
  22. Can you exchange the drivers with each other in the meantime (changing positions and wiring connections) just to rule out another point of failure? Steve
  23. I had one and it was a beauty! Superb build quality and sounded brilliant. You won't regret it (although the tuners were not the best)
  24. Fair point Spiky and I know it was a lot (was less than £100 but I'm adding a bit on for inflation) but there was no way I was going to muck around inside the amp when I had no idea what was going on in there and I now have a warranty from Panic for the conversion. Better safe than sorry for me when dealing with these sorts of things.
×
×
  • Create New...