'LewisK1975' timestamp='1469198602' post='3096581'
[color=#b22222]OK then - IMHO a cover band is any band who performs a song that was recorded and released by someone else first.[/color]
'blue' timestamp='1469199041' post='3096588'
[color=#0000ff]That's a good basic definition.[/color]
'Happy Jack' timestamp='1469201232' post='3096635'
[color=#008000]No it's not.
Several of Carole King's biggest hits were first recorded and released by other artists.
When she released her own self-penned songs later, are you seriously suggesting that made her a covers act?[/color]
'blue' timestamp='1469210893' post='3096749'
[color=#0000ff]Carole King is not a band, she's a singer/song writer and certainly not a local bar or functions band.
Very off topic[/color].
'Happy Jack' timestamp='1469217376' post='3096807'
[color=#008000]Sorry Blue but that's complete tosh.
There was an attempt to provide a workable definition of 'covers' which was a dreadful oversimplification. The attempted definition existed independently of the size or type of venue. My point stands, and I'll make my own decision as to what is off topic.[/color]
'LewisK1975' timestamp='1469445037' post='3098288'
[color=#b22222]I assume you're referring to my post:
Not sure why the size or type of venue matters?...if a band is playing a song that was recorded and released by someone else first, then at that moment in time they are being a cover band.
... snipped...
Great thread, but it's amazing how some folks can get so wound up over these sorts of things.[/color]
People tend to get more wound up when other people deliberately quote them out of context, so it's a bit sad to see you doing precisely that.
My comment "[color=#008000][i]There was an attempt to provide a workable definition of 'covers' which was a dreadful oversimplification[/i][/color][color=#0000ff][i].[/i][/color]" referred to your definition, which would have turned Carole King (and many others) into covers bands for allowing others to record & release their original songs before they chose to do so. As I said, a dreadful oversimplification.
My comment "[color=#008000][i]The attempted definition existed independently of the size or type of venue[/i][/color][color=#0000ff].[/color]" referred to Blue's enthusiastic endorsement and then defence of your definition, which was completely irrelevant because it tried to drag venue size into the matter for no apparent reason. Presumably Blue couldn't think of anything better. Give him time.
This all looks pretty straightforward to me. Which bit are you struggling with?