EBS_freak

Turn the bass output down then! Or inline attenuator.

Only if you aren’t getting what you need out of the B3N. It’s a pretty capable unit, especially for the money.

That’s what they all say... until their ears ring a little more than they are used to...

All of these mixers have their plus points and negatives... but to be fair, they are so close in terms of functionality, it's almost a level playing field. The Mackie is more intuitive - but as you say, the Behringer isn't exactly that difficult if you've invested a bit of time playing with it. Sounds like you are doing well though. Psst - https://kb.musictribe.com/musickb/view/article/all/en_US/X-Air-What-Are-The-Different-Ways-To-Connect-To-My-X-Air-Mixer

Game changer, right? You'll be going inears next

Slumming it then.

The mud or shrillness of an older transmitter is down to the compander which compresses and expands the audio pre and post radio transmission. Not so good in some units - and pretty much the decent analogue systems, even now, come with the higher price tags. Ill be surprised if a digital system “adds” treble. It’s more likely to reveal treble that would typically be lost through cable capacitance when a traditional cable is in play.

For me it's simple. A decent active FRFR with all the DSP to make it a blank canvas enables me to spend time finding a pre I like to give me the tone I like without having to juggle an extra myriad of variables in tweeters, crossovers, speakers, amps etc that you get from a traditional bass setup. For example, with a traditional bass cab, the baked in sound of that speaker cab can really mess with you if you don't clock that it's that part of your setup which is dominating your tone. With the modellers that are out there, you can twiddle to your hearts content... but conversely, you can just find that one pre that you like and just concentrate on getting on with the music.... and as Frank says, the fact that you can have your core tone and then push in extra instruments and use it as a monitor also... brilliant. Vocals tend to send a bit crap through bass rigs.

If you've had it "years" - as in many years... - it may well be analogue, so the latency will sub a ms. (in reality it's a mere fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a ms)

Holy thread revival!

Just looking at another thread... here's a question... Should there be a volume control... or a "heft" control? 😛

Those LED knobs... do people play with the settings on stage that often to required LED tipped pots?

My apologies. I'm not aware of any bass heads using Powersoft amps. But they'd probably be awesome if they are out there. I thought you were going to go with all amps under the class D banner... or are you going to go with ICEpower? Or TC's effort... or a combination of to suit the argument?

It is, but I'm currently a size 6 and feel like a right monster.

I'm trying, I'm trying... but I'm a fatty that loves biscuits and donuts. No need to keep going on about it! 😛

I think all users of Powersoft strongly disagree with you

I'm beginning to think that this may be a good idea also!

That's them out the game then. The 4 string may survive... but modern amp manufacturers trying to branch into basses? (I state Modern because I know somebody is going to mention the F word. Remember that Italian company that tried to branch into PA...? I can't remember their name... but they had little yellow speakers that looked like owl's eyes... Not doing so hot right now...?

Am I the only one wanting to see b5 with some amber hunting glasses on?

He played a Precision but there was so much studio processing it didn’t really matter what he was playing...

Indeed there is - I thought I posted a link to it earlier... although it seems to have mysteriously vanished. Maybe it didn’t post - I was on the train at the time. edit - yeah, it did post! Thought I was going mad. https://www.arduino.cc/en/Tutorial/TwoPortReceive

My avatar is completely representative.

Overkill for that - have a play with PIC. ;)