Machines

Don't expect a Rockbass to sound much like a German Warwick. They're made of a different body, neck and fingerboard wood where a lot of the Warwick sound comes from. That said - they are good basses .

Why does he need 3 ?!

[quote name='Stylon Pilson' post='507357' date='Jun 7 2009, 07:38 AM']Mac OS X is [i]clearly[/i] superior to Windows. S.P.[/quote] Yes - in every aspect ! (Except for any type of proper business usage ).

Have played a few and found them to be quite well balanced - I wouldn't get one myself but don't have a problem with them.

[quote name='silddx' post='507137' date='Jun 6 2009, 06:20 PM']he uses bloody chopsticks [b]ON A BASS[/b] for crying out loud.[/quote] He likes to noodle around in practice.

Yep I know how you feel. To be fair i've got a cheapo Hohner Precision-a-like but I want the proper Fender shape and to be able to have interchangeable pickguards etc..

Real bassists play with their ears, everyone knows that.

Another thumbs up for the $$ from me, although I do quite like the sound of it using the humbuckers as single coils (although the spacing is different to a standard Corvette).

The Ibanez would do you nicely, they sound pretty good too ! I'd say they sound pretty growly, they're not unlike Warwicks in some aspects.

[quote name='LoneWalrus' post='503887' date='Jun 2 2009, 03:26 PM']I signed up to a guitar forum recently w00p![/quote] *writes LoneWalrus in the little black book* Oh, and welcome

Welcome

[quote name='ashevans09' post='504949' date='Jun 3 2009, 07:13 PM']Here we go...[/quote] Please see my signature .

I've recently replaced a bassist who was 'let go' due to the apparent lack of skill or ability to learn new stuff. Oh well..

[quote name='Clarky' post='504907' date='Jun 3 2009, 06:12 PM']Exactly how would the luthier incorporate the sheep into the design, BBC? [/quote] Well he could have an Ashdown amp to plug it into .

[quote name='EBS_freak' post='504714' date='Jun 3 2009, 02:31 PM']There [i]has[/i] to be an Ashdown/Warwick joke in there considering the last few entries of this thread alone... but I shalln't go there.[/quote] You don't scare me . [quote]With regards to getting gear, it's what the manufacturers are willing to send. If you look at the reviews of recent times, it's not hard to work out that its down to the generosity of people like Bass Direct, the Bass Merchant etc... that they are actually getting nice things to review. If the big boys aren't providing the gear for review, doesn't that start making you ask questions...?[/quote] Totally, I know Mark at Bass Direct would be more than helpful when it comes to this sort of thing. He's openly offered stock to me in the past for review should I feel the urge. What I don't know is are the big manufacturers unwilling to play along - or is there a lack of interest from the reviewers also ?

[quote name='EBS_freak' post='504674' date='Jun 3 2009, 01:52 PM']It goes back to the old argument of whats the point of reviewing something that is readily available at your local Guitars R Us? Are people that blinkered that they have to be told that something is good as opposed to trying it out for themselves and making their own decision. I don't really hold the reviews in BGM with that much regard anyway - for reasons I have discussed earlier.[/quote] I think some people (especially beginners or those with little exposure to things beyond their local store selling just Fender) would appreciate the 'professional' opinion and advice of the reviewer. It's very easy when starting out to think something is fantastic but have it turn out to be awful once you learn more about gear on the whole, this happened to me before I got into Bassworld. [quote]I guess it depends what you want out of a magazine? Do you want it to be in the vain of What Car... (reviews for the masses) or Top Gear (pornographic reviews for the dreamers). Until the magazine decides, or is influenced by the readership, this debate will be never ending.[/quote] I think a mix is required. Of course - custom basses (or boutique in this case) can't easily be tested out, so a magazine is the best format to receive an opinion in. My gripe is that the balance is heavily towards the expensive side of things at the moment. It could be down to the boutique dealers/manufacturers being more amiable than the big boys at the moment or it could be at the request of the magazine's editors/reviewers to get hold of the top end stuff.

Definitely an improvement this issue, but I still feel there's too much emphasis on expensive custom gear. The Avella Coppollo had a price of £4.5k - how many bassists do you know who can and would spend that much on a bass ? I bet there aren't many bassists in the UK with one, i'd hazard a guess at it being less than the number of fingers and toes I have. In order to try and avoid alienating the average bassist I think there is more requirement for run-of-the mill gear, even if this can be easily self-reviewed by popping down to your local Guitars'R'Us, sometimes people want an informed opinion without having to discuss the tonal nuances of spalted Rhodesian cocopop wood versus flamed Bolivian UmBongo™ laminates.

Yeah - that part was still in draft but somehow got published ! Don't expect it to stand in it's current somewhat authoritarian state.

There isn't a review yet .

Had to remove that attachment due to it being under copyright of BGM - sorry guys. FWIW the section doesn't tell you anymore than the Barefaced website does .

That must be Shuker's first big name then ? By that I don't mean someone successful, but a big name in music at the moment rather than a few years ago . Looks pretty nice, although of course lacking in innovation !

PM sent to you BBC !