MacDaddy

[quote name='Buzz' post='482094' date='May 7 2009, 03:46 PM']I don't see how being good with watch repairs is obscene..... [/quote] Tell that to Sylar. No news for a while. Still waiting I knew the 4 week completion date was a tad optimistic

I'd still stick with the P. Verndine White seems to always have had a p pup on all the basses he used, so that would be good enough for me

Well if the choice is from your sig I'd say the P will be ideal.

[quote name='skankdelvar' post='505863' date='Jun 4 2009, 09:45 PM']Could be the old triple switcheroonie - P on Dirnt, T on Jazz, Jazz on P. Happens more often than you'd think - retailer gets bored on a wet Wednesday in Morecambe and decides to change all the necks around for a laugh.[/quote] So don't buy a bass in Morecambe?

[quote name='RussFM' post='503638' date='Jun 2 2009, 11:46 AM']Forget innovation, I want one!![/quote] +1

[quote name='obbm' post='503639' date='Jun 2 2009, 11:47 AM']If you go to the store you will see that the owner/first poster also writes tuition/transcription books so it's probably a marketing exercise for him to sell his wares.[/quote] doh! didn't notice that.

[quote name='Stingray5' post='503627' date='Jun 2 2009, 11:31 AM']Just wondered who else might have seen this new bass website called 'For Bass Players Only'. (Or am I just late to this particular party!? ) [url="http://www.forbassplayersonly.com/"]http://www.forbassplayersonly.com/[/url][/quote] you are early if anything! The only posts are by the guy who created the site, so early days. Looks USA based, but I will probably keep an eye on it.

Not just for KISS fans, a great rock show all round!

[quote name='Spoombung' post='498909' date='May 27 2009, 03:45 PM']The bass actually needs a few tweeks (I'll elaborate later)and annoyingly, I have to try and find time to take it back to Mike ASAP to get it sorted out.[/quote] So what were the tweaks?

[quote name='Spoombung' post='498909' date='May 27 2009, 03:45 PM']The bass actually needs a few tweeks (I'll elaborate later)and annoyingly, I have to try and find time to take it back to Mike ASAP to get it sorted out.[/quote] So what were the tweaks?

We will be expecting build diary's from all 3 of you!

[quote name='OldGit' post='501334' date='May 30 2009, 12:02 AM']Paid for them frets, I'm gonna use them [/quote] awesome

[quote name='WHUFC BASS' post='501303' date='May 29 2009, 11:09 PM']have a word with that avatar...[/quote] illogical.

[quote name='velvetkevorkian' post='501228' date='May 29 2009, 08:51 PM']Here's page 2 (possibly). Also, on a similar note, I saw a piece by Brian Ferneyhough which was in 4/12. That just about caused a riot when I queried it over on TalkBass.[/quote] yes but a 12th of what

[quote name='Rich' post='501142' date='May 29 2009, 05:50 PM']I think he tried to fire himself via text once, but then he agreed to meet himself at a neutral pub to try to iron out both his difficulties. It's all sorted now.[/quote] I think I should meet myself at a neutral pub and have a word

[quote name='EBS_freak' post='501100' date='May 29 2009, 04:45 PM']Just out of interest, how is the proofing done? Not that it's any of my business... I just counted the number of frets on the Alleva Copolla and then was a bit perplexed when I saw the spec box.... and as for the final remark from Copollo... what? It took me a few reads to get what was being said! The TC amp review was quite an interesting read because after I tested one at length, it left me kind of cold. OK, everybody has their own preferences - I know that there are as many people who hate EBS amps as love them (I'm not that short-sighted) - so I do try to view things with an open mind... To me, it seemed to be lacking in grunt and power. Certainly, when I dug in, it didn't have the headroom that I was hoping for. It was pleasant enough, extemely portable - but the head came across as quite fragile and it certainly didn't seem to be an amp that provides a big sound on stage. For example, in a rock situation, does it hack it? Was it reviewed in such a situation? OK, we know that all tools aren't fit for all jobs but if that's the case, why is it not stated? Who is this amp aimed at? For what type of environment? Whilst I have nothing but upmost respect for Janek and Ben Epstein (really great guy), they aren't using it in a situation that is comparable to the average reader. (Doesn't Ben use inears so the sound onstage from his amp is of less importance?) Are these guys playing the majority of their gigs where the amp is the only source of bass? I don't think so. How does this amp perform in a real world situtation experienced by most of the readers, where the amp is the back line - with no PA support? Does it cut it as a 5 star amp then? Maybe it does - but the magazine doesn't really address that - and hence my confidence in 5 stars across the board is not that high. It's OK going on about the features of the products being reviewed but it's no use at all if the thing can't hack it out of the bedroom/studio/whatever... Whenever I read a review, these are the things that are going through my head... and these are the questions that are seldom answered. PS - the optional footswitch. How much is it?[/quote] what he said ^

started on classical guitar and 7 years later transfered the technique over to bass - via electric guitar. My choice

[quote name='yorick' post='500393' date='May 28 2009, 11:11 PM']Certainly is.... or was in my case.[/quote] Interesting. He wants to take the tribute band to the [i]next level[/i], when he's talking about imminent world domination with the new line up of Wrathchild?

yorick I see you're in Brum. Was the band the one with Rocky Shades as Dave?

[quote name='jakesbass' post='499878' date='May 28 2009, 02:12 PM']Not really... you're confusing straightforward maths with a 'term', an eighth is a description of duration and it has as much to do with how notes are grouped as anything eg 6/8 can be grouped as 2 3s or 3 2s giving an inner pulse to the bar, or a driving 8ths feel to a rock bassline, or a slow inner four with a triplet feel in 12/8 (one of my fave feels) The bottom number simply lets you know what the note looks like (ie stem with single tail) the top number tells you how many there are in a given bar. For me the bottom line is that the terminology is irrelevant and not worth twisting knickers over, just be au fait with all of it then you can explain yourself well to all comers.[/quote] just seen this after I posted. I think we are using the same argument to argue a different point

[quote name='Eight' post='499829' date='May 28 2009, 01:27 PM']Yes, because you're applying a fraction to a different data set than everyone else. It's the way the notation system currency works, and it isn't related to the meter of a particular track. (Ignoring triplets etc.) A semibreve divides in half to create two minims. A semibreve divides in quarters to create four crotchetts A semibreve divides into eighths to create eight quavers. Just like a pound divides into 100 pence. Always. Irrespective of how much money you have in your pocket. [/quote] but that's my point you can't ignore triplets or you are ignoring triplet time and the values change. The value of an 8th should be constant, but obviously it isn't which is why 6 quaver beats to a bar makes sense to me. Bearing in mind how some recent threads have gone, isn't nice that we can disagree and all be perfectly pleasant about it