Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

three

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    964
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by three

  1. According to my tech, the most incredibly over engineered amp he’s ever seen. Certainly not the lightest and a tone all of its own. I’ve had a few of these and I’m just selling a stereo 250. Pretty unique
  2. Fabulous basses and the upgrades are a real bonus. The tonal options are brilliant and I miss mine. That nut looks like a superb bit of work
  3. I’ve just gone down from 40-95 to 30-90 on shorties (and two of the last long scales) with an extremely low action. Unusual I know, but I play with a very light touch (and my usual comedy technique)
  4. That bass sort of rings a bell. It looks like the bass player on the original track was Larry Klein but I'm pretty sure that's not him on the TOTP appearance. I'll be interested to know if somebody can identify the instrument - from what I can see, I like the look of it
  5. There are some superb instruments on here at present at very reasonable prices. However, this has got to be one of BC's biggest bargains. An absolutely stunning luthier/custom instrument for a bargain bin price
  6. @funkle Thanks very much indeed for an extremely enjoyable thread - it's great to see somebody with a refined vision and the energy, persistence and ingenuity to follow it through. In this case, the vision was followed-through to a very positive conclusion in my view. The Wal mystique/mytery has been well and truly nailed from what I can hear. Indeed, the comparisons are excellent and the Walish sounds more Wal than the Wal. I know that sounds ridiculous, but to me, the Walish sounds slightly thicker and sweeter than the Wal in some modes, and it's that thickness and sweetness that I find most attractive about the Wal electronics/overall recipe. This sort of makes it more possible to achieve Wal-like tones without the compromises (to me) of having a Wal bass - I've had a few, and those compromises undermined the tonal goal. My aim/daydream now is to try this with a short-scale bass. Of course, a big compromise in itself and a short-scale is unlikely to sound exactly like a Wal, though I hope to be able to get close. Thank you again, a tour de force
  7. sounds great to me - a really punchy P sound (as you'd hope). The light weight makes this really attractive too. Looks like a bit of a bargain and good luck in finding a J type that suits your needs
  8. I'd be very interested to see what Martin (Gallery) says and can do to help here. I have a very similar problem with a fretless four, though it's the E string, and to a lesser degree, the G string that are problematic. Dead spots from B to E/F on the G, but the E is just generally lacking sustain. A plucked open E dies much more quickly than A/D/G and it feels like there's something absorbing or countering the energy in the string (there's a peculiar sort of counter vibration that I can feel in the neck). I suspect it's a truss-rod issue (or a loose components somewhere) so probably off to a good tech in the next week or two - I'll update when I know more, and good to hear the Gallery's opinion on the MM
  9. Excellent news - it’ll take a bit of time to adjust I’d imagine but it sounds like a good decision. I use a 7050 mainly for infill - my near fields roll-off around 60Hz. The only frustration for me with the Genelec was the link-through 85Hz cross-over that can’t be defeated - otherwise a classy sub and I’m sure the 7040 is the same. I just run full signal to the near fields and run the subs from around 75 down. I hope it works out for you
  10. three

    Peak Wal?

    Thanks, I'd made assumptions that I shouldn't have made!
  11. three

    Peak Wal?

    I’d no idea re: Wal and the Hellborg power amp. Fascinating and I wonder if it remains in place? I’ve had quite a few of these amps and still have one. Massively heavy and according to a well known studio tech, the most over-built power amp he’d seen. That said, they are not at all a transparent amp - there’s a gritty baked-in tone that surprised me initially, to the extent that I thought it was a fault. Four or five units later, it’s evident that the grit is designed-in. I wonder whether this has any influence on the calibration of contemporary Wal electronics? Back on topic, i’ve watched in awe at the stratospheric price increases. I’ve owned a few Wals and played a lot (I’m a fan of the tone and the v profile, especially on the earlier basses) but found them a little uncomfortable, and in some respects a bit agricultural. The prices in the ‘90s - relative to other basses - seemed about right to me
  12. Intriguing! I didn’t know Status had produced a 33” scale SeriesII. Does the bass have a bendwell (probably not, I think the latter takes the scale down to 32” - it did on my Streamlines… I think)?
  13. 22 frets on a 30.5" (actually 30 and 3/8" on a Spector Shorty) scale is my preferred configuration, though 24 frets on 30.75" works very well too
  14. I thought of Ned too and there’s much more than a nod. The Callan official (?) marketing seems to indicate 22 frets but all the images I can find show 20. I rather like the look of these and was a fan of the basses that inspired them, though haven’t owned one. I’ll be making efforts to try the new version
  15. Thanks for this - I looked pretty closely at the grain pattern on the back of the head and it looked the same (maybe close in terms of blanks?) I notice subsequently that mine had the longer posts on the tuners. Still, a beautiful bass (I like the pickup spray idea) and first class seller
  16. Absolutely no use to me, but the case is worth the entry fee on its own
  17. I think this used to be mine (though it had a black pick-up cover on the J pickup?). If it was mine, it's an absolutely staggeringly good bass. Undoubtedly, the finest Fender type necks I've played - the J necks are super-slender and feel fabulous in the hand. One of Basschat's finest sellers too!
  18. Unbelievable - wow! I’ve never seen such a beautiful top on an Essence
  19. I’d have a look at the GSS Sumo range - simple and simply superb in my experience
  20. Is that a P Special I see in your avatar? One of the best basses Fender have ever built IMO. The Dan Smith era involved an incredible leap in quality as far as I can see... and yes, generally less expensive than mid-late '70s Fenders - all of the latter that have been in my ownership have been crazily heavy
  21. Wonderful to see something so different, and to me, very beautiful. It could be an illusion but it doesn't appear that the dots on the board align with the side-of-neck markers. Is this something to do with intonation of the higher strings, an illusion or something else? Again, a really lovely looking instrument and the carving looks fabulous
  22. Re-listing - this was sold but returned as the buyer required a five rather than a four string bridge. Price reduced to £70. I appear to have accumulated a number of gold bridges that I don't need. This is a brand new, unfitted Hipshot Kickass in its original packaging and with all screws and spares etc. I only opened the packaging to check that all was in order. These seem to go for around £120 (that’s what I paid) - I think BD has them in stock. I can ship in the UK (at buyer's risk) for £5. Any questions, please just ask.
  23. I have the 210 version and it’s by far my favourite 210! I can imagine the 410 just offers more of everything - utter bargain IMO
  24. I've admired this bass for a long time - an absolutely staggering work of art. I recently bought a fretless so have no need and no money. However, I can still dream - beautiful (and for me, OTL LEDs on a fretless are a very useful addition)
  25. I was sort of looking for a similar solution but ended-up with a lead with a Neutrik silent jack (Designacable). It seems to work very efficiently and I haven't had a problem - a really quick change-over between basses. That said, both the pedals above look like a good bet
×
×
  • Create New...