Misdee

It depends what you mean by neck dive. A Fender -style bass will usually neck dive on your knee without a strap, but will balance fairly well on a strap. A common misconception is that neck dive is a result of a lightweight body and a heavier neck. It is far more to do with the balance points where the strap attaches. Lightweight tuners can help, but bass that neck dives will continue to do so regardless of how heavy the body is.

The standard of journalism and overall presentation in Bass Player Magazine in its heyday was in a different league from BGM. Sorry to say, but I can't escape the feeling that BGM is a thinly-veiled excuse for promoting the goods and services of its advertisers and sponsors. This robs it of objectivity and compromises its integrity.

Jim Fielder.

The late great John Wetton:

Jon Shuker's work has always been superb in my experience. A very decent man to do business with, too.

I'm not being negative about these basses, though. I hope Dr T enjoys his lovely new basses. I am going to buy one, too!

I'm sorry to say, my friend, but it is you who are inaccurate here. " Dead spots" refers to noticeably quieter and weaker notes caused by the resonant frequency of the neck. This has nothing to do with the truss rod issues you refer to, and is the reason why the Stingray has a 3+1 tuning arrangement.Furthermore, the anecdote you relate about the necks on the pre-EB basses is slightly confused and misleading. According to legend, the issues with the truss-rods was deliberate negligence as the reaction to an ongoing dispute, but was in the late 70's, well into the relationship between CLF and MM. Production of the Stingray was subsequently taken over by Grover Jackson, but plenty of Stingrays made by CLF were sold to the public.

I suppose it's not EBMM's fault that the pound has crashed against the dollar since 2016, hence the high price for these basses. Regarding dead spots and weak G strings, I've got a hunch that these basses may well suffer from them less than previous Stingrays. The new design pickups and preamp are substantially derived from the Bongo, which definitely doesn't suffer from either of those problems. Dead spots were a problem from the outset with the Stingray design.The reason Leo Fender designed the 3+1 headstock arrangement was to counteract a very pronounced dead spot at the 5th fret on the E string of his early prototypes. Maybe EBMM have found a way to banish the problem (or at least temper it) by means of brute force with the new 18V preamp and neodymium pickup.

I've tried Warwick Black Label strings on a Fender Jazz and they were noticeably less bright than most other steel strings, and fairly low tension. I tried the Yellow Label strings on a fretless and they were pretty unremarkable but cheap.

I've got a fairly high-end bass in my very modest collection that is absolutely perfect in every respect that I have just never taken to from day one. The bass is a USA-made Lakland Joe Osborn/ 44-60 with ChiSonic pickups. This bass, which I custom ordered from Lakland. sounds great, plays great, looks beautiful etc. but I just have never particularly enjoyed it. I've not tried to sell it yet because, on paper at least it is so perfect, but I've had it long enough to know that I will never play it much. So, yes I can relate to your dilemma and being ambivalent about selling a perfectly good bass that you are lukewarm about.

These basses, contrary to my initial misgivings, sound very good indeed and the light weight and new contours promise a much more ergonomic Stingray. However, I don't like black hardware on a traditional 4 string Stingray. I'm not keen on ebony fingerboards either. Or sparkle finishes.And the white ones are the wrong shade of white to go with the roasted maple. The overall reaction to how these basses look has been very positive, but i am struggling to find one I could live with, to be honest. I don't like the bridge, either. No Stingray really looks right without the big old-style mute bridge. I will still probably buy one, anyway. And then not be happy with it.

AJ started using his Jazz Bass in the mid- to- late 70s. Before that he used a Precision. His work with the O'Jays, for example, is a P Bass.

I only mean to make the point that NYC is not uniquely expensive. Yes, Fodera could build their basses elsewhere, but the profile of the company and their stellar roster of famous endorsees rely on their being in NYC. So, if they had been based in Iowa to begin with, they would not be the Fodera we now know. And if they were to now relocate I doubt they would lower their prices. Why should they? All it would mean is a bigger profit margin, but would it be worth the inconvenience and loss of prestige? Almost certainly not. Foderas are expensive, but if you want that level of quality it's good to know that someone has the expertise to provide it.

As a rule, I am not really into exotic wood basses but that is an absolutely stunning instrument. Might be the nicest Fodera I have ever seen.

Without wishing to cause offence, I am dubious that this is what Fodera actually said. And even if they said it, it isn't necessarily true. Elsewhere in the USA? Brooklyn real estate prices are lower than San Francisco, for example. Boston and San Jose are not far behind.

Just to muddy the waters further, AJ is on record as saying that his signature Fodera is essentially a big Fender Precision Bass. the instrument he made his name with in the mid-70s. Fodera basses are not really my cup of tea, but there is no question that they are worth the money they cost. The fact that they are manufactured in NYC may contribute to a small extent to their price tag, but it is not realistic to suppose that they would be half the price , or even anything remotely like that if they were made anywhere else in the USA. The reason they are expensive is because of the amount of skilled man-hours it takes to make these basses.

For me, the big question is whether Yamaha is going to revive Ampeg as a prestige brand manufactured primarily in the USA.I certainly hope so. I bought an Ampeg SCR preamp a while back and, contrary to the marketing hype, it was an extremely disappointing product, as far as I was concerned. I'm sure that Yamaha will improve the standard of Ampeg gear, I just hope they make quality their priority rather than affordability. I don't want cheap gear with an Ampeg logo on it, I want proper Ampeg even if it costs a lot of money.

I've played both of these basses and I don't think you can say that one could replace the other. Sadowsky basses have a distinct tone, largely due to the preamp. Sei basses, particularly the more modern style exotic wood Jazz basses have a modern hifi tone with less of the classic Fender sound in it. Sei basses are superbly built, but the attraction of Sadowsky basses is not just owing to the quality of their construction. It is the overall appeal of their design and the profile the company enjoys.That is why the bass world is full of companies that make basses that they and their customers tell themselves will substitute for a Sadowsky.

I don't want to hijack this thread, but are the Stingray Classic necks on the chunky side? I've never got to play one of these basses, but I really want a Stingray and I much prefer the old-style 2 band EQ and vintage styling. I'd always presumed that the Classic necks would be fairly slim, like the old Stingrays. Any info gratefully received.

I am not an expert on copyright by any means, but surely this "Wrongo" is on very shaky ground? Anyhow, I am genuinely mystified why so many people think the Bongo is ugly or ungainly in some way. I think it is a beautiful design. It looks better in the flesh than in pics or photos. I agree totally with Dr. T.that the recipient of this bass should try to get his hands on a real Bongo. If you want a high - tech, hifi modern bass with a powerful sound and a distinct personality of its own then you can't do better.

I'm not an expert on this subject by any means(!), but I would be amazed if a chip on a black finish like that couldn't be masked to some extent without going to the lengths of a total refinish. A skilled repairer would probably be able to do something to make it far less noticeable.

I would think that the chaps at The Gallery might well be able to sort out a little chip in the finish like that. Even if it can't be made perfect, I'm sure it could be improved a great deal. Regarding why Wunjo haven't re-finished the knock before selling the bass, it could be for a number of reasons. Some people wouldn't be particularly bothered by superficial cosmetic damage if the bass is suitably reduced in price. Also, the shop could be accused of trying to mask the damage if they did not openly draw customers attention to it. Much better for the shop to leave the bass as it is and let people decide if they want to buy it and then do something about the damage themselves.

Came across this band by accident on YT recently. Have to be honest with you, I find it a bit mystifying why young people would want to ape the sound of Led Zeppelin's first album fifty years after the event. This band is the musical equivalent of those historical re- enactors who play at being in the olden days.It would be easy to be scathing of these kids, but I'm sure their hearts are in the right place. Personally, I blame the parents. As with most nostalgia, this music is hankering after a golden age that in reality wasn't that golden. The great irony is that these youngsters are looking backwards at a time when "progressive" music was all about looking forwards, being experimental and original and creating new forms.