Kiwi

I thought the LP's had stickers on the underside?

Volume can be so dependent on a range of things. I've depped in bands where the bass was only through the PA on a small gig. Other times I've struggled to be heard above the drummer with 400w. My advice is don't scoop the mids and make sure whatever cabs you are playing through are POINTED AT YOUR EARS!!! If that isn't the case, don't blow loads of dosh on extra watts until it is.

I'm involved. It wasn't ignored.

[quote name='12stringbassist' timestamp='1350597505' post='1841197'] There are 4 genuine Rics in the picture. I'm certainly not offering anything for sale. If John Hall wants to have a dicky fit about the existence of the John Birch bass here that was made in 1976 and the Retrovibe in the last two years, then that's his own affair.[/quote] Unfortunately its not that simple. It's a problem that he can easily transfer to other parties he has issue with while there is a lack of legal clarity around the role played by forums in promotion of trademark infringement. [quote name='12stringbassist' timestamp='1350597505' post='1841197'] I don't think that any forum is, or can reasonably be, or even should be, controlled by John Hall's desires. Even the RRF has an area to discuss copies (though they generally meet with hoots of derision from nearly all concerned). Neither of them is a faker in the true sense, either. A faker is [i]something that can be passed off as the real thing - an exact counterfeit[/i]. The basses are definitely Ric-styled basses, but the designs themselves, while featuring features very similar to copyrighted Ric shapes etc aren't really exact. But no-one with working eyes would think they were Rics![/quote] I agree, but his actions speak for themselves. Interesting that the Rickenbacker has an area for discussing copies. It certainly defines Mr Hall's standards and expectations more clearly for us. Thanks for that. The only way to be clear about the matter of infringement is to pay lawyers lots of money to have an argument. Also, because its a grey area, its not just about technical compliance, the forums integrity and position on infringement issues would also taken into consideration by a judge. This is why knowing there's an area on a forum sanctioned by Mr Hall for discussing copies is useful. [quote name='12stringbassist' timestamp='1350597505' post='1841197'] Banning a photo of anything Ric shaped would be discriminatory against all the other makers, so you'd have to ban pics of Rics too. [/quote] It would be discriminiatory against other makers who could be accused of trademark infringement. [quote name='12stringbassist' timestamp='1350597505' post='1841197']And if Fender got snotty about all the makers who shamelessly nicked their ideas - Fodera, Sandberg, etc etc etc, then we'd have nothing at all to look at.[/quote] You probably wouldn't, I agree. It might also reflect very badly on Fender in marketing terms too. Would Fender care if they felt they were addressing something they felt was an injustice and a moral right? Probably not.

This is the kind of photo that risks pushing Mr Hall's boundaries and would be most easily managed by banning all photos of anything Rickenbacker shaped. Just sayin'.

Loads of examples with graphite necks that are well documented on here already. There was a joke once about a very attractive but not-too-bright lady who walks into a chemist and asks for "one of those rectal deoderants". The chemist looks at her confused and asks her to clarify what she means. "Rectal deoderant" she says. "Its one of those sticks...I got some here last time." "I'm sorry ma'am but we don't carry anything like that in stock." She gets visibly frustrated as its an embarrassing thing to ask for. So the chemist asks her to identify what the deoderant looked like. "You know, its got pink packaging...looks just like a normal stick deoderant." The chemist asks her how she knows it's a rectal deoderant and she replies."it's got instructions on the back that say 'to use, push up bottom'."

I'd swap it for your Kramer

[quote name='Shockwave' timestamp='1350134243' post='1834969'] Pretty sure they mostly make only 35" inches. [/quote] They do now. I have a Spector NS5CR which is 34", all maple construction, wider string spacing and a thicker neck than the post 2000 models and I'd be interested in selling it. Shipping would be a killer though.

Its not up to him to judge whether its a legacy or not.

[quote name='KevB' timestamp='1350032966' post='1833681'] Quote from Plant ; "It would be precocious of me to walk to the front of the stage and take on a kind of rock singer pose, at that time in my being – and that's five years ago. I could only send it up, and I don't want to do that." I think he has a perfectly valid point and applaud his attitude when there are so many ageing rockers still grinding out tours to an ever diminishing audience.[/quote] I think its selfish at worst and self depreciating at best. The band has already acknowledged their impact on popular music, they're every bit as significant as The Beatles. They should share it...if nothing it would cement their place in musical immortality.

Three originals and one drummer.

Me too.

Thanks I love Led Zep and I'm not into rock at all. But there was something magical about them. So much power and professionalism from three people. I REALLY wish they'd reform and do a few more concerts. I'd fly from NZ for a ticket. I disagree with Plants perception of raking over the coals. Its more about sharing a legacy with a new generation. I wasn't able to attend concerts when Led Zep were in their prime. They could be cementing their legacy rather than being a shadow of their former selves. This is about being generous, not about protecting integrity.

Not interested in subscribing to the Guardian on Facebook.

Looks like someone's just unearthed it on a beach somewhere.

Taurus pedals would be the most practical option. MIDI them up to the module of your choice, and your hands stay free.

[quote name='cheddatom' timestamp='1349710422' post='1829431'] It'd be ace if you could do a bass-themed interview for Basschat! [/quote] No promises but I'm making enquiries as I type...

Neat, he'll be over in my neck of the woods next month to support one of our projects at work. I'll see if I can grab some time with him.

[quote name='neepheid' timestamp='1348358599' post='1812800'] I don't know who makes Hartke bass strings and I don't care - I love how they sound, how they feel, they have no silks and they're ridiculously inexpensive [/quote] Plus the one on this. I also like Olympus strings, they're identical to the ones offered by EBS. Both made in Sweden.

I find jazz basses very comfortable and the sound of a 70's ash bodied jazz with a maple board is very evocative. But those scooped mids make playing one in a live situation challenging. There are other basses that can do the job better. In my experience, there's a lot to be said for either single pick up basses or onboard electronics with buffered input channels.