Dad3353

... not to mention ... Obvious Antlers Ketchum Knots Bewildered Snakes

... and ... Obvious Snakes Ketchum Antlers Bewildered Knots

The Daub'z; our original rehearsal space was at La Daubelière. Happy with it..? Of course, or we'd have changed it.

How's the insurance cover handled..? How long does it take for an ambulance to arrive..? Who doesn't like the singer..? What on earth can be on that mountain of bass pedals that add to the performance..? Where are the dancing girls, and how many jugglers have been booked..? Obviously the 'keys' player has no need to hear what's going on elsewhere on that football pitch of a stage. Other than that : rock on.

Nah; never did like the beggar...

Not at all; it's a Shergold Modulator.

What splendid drumming.

That wasn't my point, really. If I have a multi-pair with loose XLR's, I can plug any one into any channel. If I have a multi-pair with DB25's (or any other multi-pin connector...), the channel affectation is fixed. No big deal in a stable, permanent installation, but could be an issue with patching 'live', on stage. In your case, it's not a problem, so ignore. By 'manufacture', I mean the quality of the connector itself, but more importantly the quality of the cable and its sheathing, and the soldering or crimping. I wouldn't recommend a 'budget' connector, especially if it's to be manipulated often, but quality for audio use is a more delicate matter than for, for instance, a connector in an automobile or computer hook-up. Non-corroding pins, for instance, so that good audio contact is maintained for decades. Look up 'NorComp', for example. I'd not go down the 'AliBaba' route.

Those 'triangular' grouping is to reduce crosstalk. A well-manufactured DB25 would be a better connector than a slew of XLR's, generally, but less flexible, as the channels are hard-wired, whereas XLR's can be swapped around.

And stamps are for sticking on letters. Some folk collect milk-bottle-tops, others VW Beetles. Some collect basses. S'a funny ol' world.

Don't wait up for me, adoring public, I may yet have inspiration, but it's not bobbed up yet. My Muse is a shy beggar, and without her I am useless. OK, with her I am useless, too, but still ...

Alice..? Who the ............

Disclaimer : more than half-deaf, especially in the upper registers, so... It sounds fine, to me, on my monitors and my headphones; nicely balanced, in fact. As for the playing : yes, that's how Musicians play Music, so no great surprise. Excellent interpretation, which one wouldn't get from a keyboard such as a clavecin or piano, with the subtle vibrato and micro-bends adding tasteful life to the piece. Great timing, too, avoiding the mechanical metronomic rendition that Bach so often suffers from. Thanks for sharing.

And the winner is ... @NickD..! Here, then, is your Winner's Certificates (download and save as pdf file, then proudly print and frame...) ... BC_Chal_Cert_2023_02.pdf ... which look like this (but bigger, of course..!)…

Correct. Mea culpa.

See here ...

Sigh... '...under the modern Fender brand, that's not it's place in the 21st century market...

If they had the same relative cost as those Fender offerings, they would be a bargain, I'd say. Not many new cars around, still less coupés, for sixteen grand. They cost between two and four month's average salary at the time (1928...). Current equivalent would be eight to sixteen thousand. The Thinline, on the other hand, costs far more than its original issue.

It's not (yet...) a suitable proposition for making sousaphones, either. Maybe one day, though, unless Armageddon comes first.

Emma Burton..?

When introduced as a 'new, improved' Telecaster model, the Thinline cost roughly two week's wages ($375; average US salary at the time : $7800...). Things have changed... Wasn't nitro-cellulose deemed a health hazard a while back, and phased out, generally..? How 'green' are the 'new' 'vintage' finishes (or doesn't that worry some Americans any more..?)..?

Any Blender window can be filled with whatever function is required, and split, either horizontally or vertically, so as to compose the view that's right for the circumstances. I can't speak for 'palettes' as such, as I mainly use the 3D functions, and colour things with UV textures, not 'paint' as such. Blender has many facets, and those that I use for 3D are quite different from those used, for example, by a sculptor, or photo-real artist. The GUI stays the same, however, so I could easily adapt another's set-up for my own usage. The mouse movements and keyboard shortcuts would be those I wish to use, and with a 'right-click' on any command, I can add it to an 'express' menu fro my most common function calls. For another project, I may well change these for a more suitable set. It's very flexible, not rigid at all. I doubt that Windows, Apple, GEM, Linux, Unix... whatever... could design a GUI that would be perfect for everyone's use in every situation without offering some form of personalised configuration. 'Horses for courses', and 'We're all different' and all that, of course. I had a look, and couldn't (rapidly...) find a 3D package that adheres to the Apple standard, either. A gap in the market, maybe..?