Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

I suspect the change to digital will lead to Sansamp licensing their sound to Line 6, Neural etc which I would support whole heartedly!

Posted
Just now, fretmeister said:

NAMM

 

Not

Available

Maybe

May.

 

 

Yeah, at the earliest. And who knows what the price will be if Trump hasn’t calmed down 🙄

Posted
Just now, dave_bass5 said:

Yeah, at the earliest. And who knows what the price will be if Trump hasn’t calmed down 🙄

 

I admire your optimism that he won't have started WW3 by then.

Posted

I like the look of that, and $299 seems a decent price that'd hopefully translate to about that in £. seing as a $ is £0.74 and I suppose there are import costs. 

 

Tough, simple and looks like it can do all the things you really need for gigs: Tuner, compression, drive, EQ, line and XLR out, fx loop, simple to access presets, and some nice to have extras like filter, IRs, Chorus (I wonder if it can do other modulation effects or delays?), midi.  

 

I suppose the key thing will be if it sounds good though. I'm not against digital, but there is a big variation between a good digital overdrive and a bad one.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, acidbass said:

I suspect the change to digital will lead to Sansamp licensing their sound to Line 6, Neural etc which I would support whole heartedly!

 

Just an observation but if this is the 'digital' version of the Tech 21 DI bass driver type thing, is it not already modelled in the Helix/Stomp units?  

 

It may well be getting produced by the originator of that tone but at the end of the day it is just software/capture/modelling?

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, warwickhunt said:

 

Just an observation but if this is the 'digital' version of the Tech 21 DI bass driver type thing, is it not already modelled in the Helix/Stomp units?  

 

It may well be getting produced by the originator of that tone but at the end of the day it is just software/capture/modelling?

 

 

The HX version is a Mk1 without a mid control. And as always - models of the same thing but on a different modelling platform sound different due to different approaches to the task.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, fretmeister said:

 

 

The HX version is a Mk1 without a mid control. And as always - models of the same thing but on a different modelling platform sound different due to different approaches to the task.

 

This where I get lost off... :) 

 

It may well be the Mk1 with no mid control but the HX has dozens of ways of adding/subtracting mids while using the Tech 21 block.  Surely if the core tone is right, then anything else is just embellishment as you'd get by tweaking EQ from the bass through to an amp or desk?

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, SumOne said:

I like the look of that, and $299 seems a decent price that'd hopefully translate to about that in £. seing as a $ is £0.74 and I suppose there are import costs. 

Tough, simple and looks like it can do all the things you really need for gigs: Tuner, compression, drive, EQ, line and XLR out, fx loop, simple to access presets, and some nice to have extras like filter, IRs, Chorus (I wonder if it can do other modulation effects or delays?), midi.  

I suppose the key thing will be if it sounds good though. I'm not against digital, but there is a big variation between a good digital overdrive and a bad one.

 

So it's essentially a drive focussed multifx? Just wondering (other than XLR out) what it's offering over some of the more popular multifx's some of which have very usable drive patches?

 

I guess, fingers crossed, it will be nailing the classic sansamp sound better than most!

Edited by Al Krow
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, warwickhunt said:

 

Just an observation but if this is the 'digital' version of the Tech 21 DI bass driver type thing, is it not already modelled in the Helix/Stomp units?  

 

It may well be getting produced by the originator of that tone but at the end of the day it is just software/capture/modelling?

 

The thing I find though is just because a company says it had digitally recreated something, doesn't mean it's a good recreation. Helix say they recreate it, as do Zoom, and Boss, all to varying levels of success.  I dunno, but I'd assume sansamp can do sansamp better than anyone else, perhaps not though.

Posted
5 minutes ago, SumOne said:

 

The thing I find though is just because a company says it had digitally recreated something, doesn't mean it's a good recreation. Helix say they recreate it, as do Zoom, and Boss, all to varying levels of success.  I dunno, but I'd assume sansamp can do sansamp better than anyone else, perhaps not though.

 

 

This is why every firms "Plexi" amp model sounds different too - they all used a different favourite plexi to model and as we know even plexis made next to each other can sound very different.

 

Then there's different approaches. Fractal have always presented a "perfected" version of a model for ease of use and Line 6 went for warts and all accuracy but that needs a bit more experience to dial in and leads to some people thinking the models are wrong. The new L6 stadium apparently has both options.

 

And then of course finally you get those who say "That doesn't sound like a real XX" even though they've never been in a room with a real XX.

 

Plexi and Dual Recs get that the most. Complaining that the plexi isn't high gain (FFS) and complaining that the Dual Rec is flubby and not a metal super amp (it isn't. Not without boosts and drives).

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...