la bam Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago After years and years of 2x10, 4x10, 2x12, 6x10, if convinced myself that 15s are where "my" sound is. Just love them, now that I understand eq. Years and years when I didn't fully understand eq, ago they were muddy and dull. Too bassy. Having played the odd one or two 15 combos in practice rooms I always was really impressed. Peavey, GK etc. Then my recent trace valve 15 (but that was glorious anyway). Then tonight played through a really cheap ashdown head and a 2x15 hartke cab - which started shocking, but one I boosted the mods and reduced a bit of treble sounded glorious. I'm never up with fashions... And all the recent bass cab fashions seems to be 10s and 12s... Any love for 15 inch cabs? Quote
chris_b Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago I use 15's for 30 years, a couple of Peavey 115 and 215's, a Fender 215, but mostly EV's in Dynacord, Musicman and Mesa Boogie cabs. They gave me the sound I liked. IMO these days well designed 12" cabs can do anything a 15 could do, and they'll do it better. Quote
Bill Fitzmaurice Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago When EQ'd for the same frequency response you cannot tell the driver size. You can have a dozen drivers of the same size with a dozen different frequency responses. When cabs have the same cone displacement, be it from one larger driver or more than one smaller drivers, they have the same maximum output. The only factor that's attributable to cone size alone is the dispersion angle, it grows narrower as the cone grows larger. Even that can be tweaked, and for that matter a pair of tens placed horizontal will have narrower dispersion than a single eighteen. In the end one factor, be it cone size or any of the more than a dozen factors that sum to give the end result, doesn't determine said result. It's that sum total. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.