Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

The Short Scale Bass Appreciation Society!

Baloney Balderdash

By Baloney Balderdash,
in Bass Guitars

 Share

Recommended Posts

JohnDaBass Veteran

JohnDaBass

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Baloney Balderdash said:

Yeah, well, specs doesn't happen to be a matter of opinion.

 

Oops 🤫

I'll dig out my sack shirt and once the coals have cooled I'll roll around in the ashes as penance for my unholy mistake.  At 70 yrs old I am normally forgiven for the odd senior momentary lapse. But perhaps its different in Denmark. 

  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
vates Enthusiast

vates

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, JohnDaBass said:

I am quite familiar with the JMJ Mustang neck having tried a number of them at different retailers and I was really impressed with the modern slim "C" shaped neck and how consistent the necks were having different production batches. Reinforcing the improvement in QC and consistency of the CNC and finishing. 

It appears to me that neck on the Mike Kerr has the same feel and specs. 

" 30ins scale,  38mm nut width,  modern slim C shape neck profile, 9.5ins radius fingerboard,  medium jumbo frets, and slab rosewood fretboard."

The main differences are fret markers and the truss rod adjustment on the JMJ is at the heel of the neck and the truss rod adjustment on the Mike Kerr is at the nut. Other than that the specs are the same IMHO.

@vates

 

 

Yeah, as mentioned above, the nut width is different. The shape is also technically different: 'C' shape vs 'Modern C' (the latter is a tad slimmer).

Also the finish is different: nitro vs urethane.

 

So, for you they may feel the same but, given my previous experience, I'd probably perceive them as two rather different animals (nut width being the most important difference for me).

 

Thanks for clarifying! 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnDaBass Veteran

JohnDaBass

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, vates said:

 

 

Yeah, as mentioned above, the nut width is different. The shape is also technically different: 'C' shape vs 'Modern C' (the latter is a tad slimmer).

Also the finish is different: nitro vs urethane.

 

So, for you they may feel the same but, given my previous experience, I'd probably perceive them as two rather different animals (nut width being the most important difference for me).

 

Thanks for clarifying! 

3.2mm ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Baloney Balderdash Grand Master

Baloney Balderdash

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, JohnDaBass said:

3.2mm ??

Yes, 3.2mm makes quite a difference in feel !!

 

Just think about what a 3.2mm difference would mean in terms of string action for instance.

 

Or, to give an example that is closer to a 1:1 case, the difference in feel between the 42mm nut width of a regular P Bass and then the standard 45mm nut width of a regular 5 string bass.

 

Quite a lot I'd say.

 

Edited by Baloney Balderdash
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dAs Newbie

dAs

Posted
Posted
On 11/08/2023 at 08:21, JohnDaBass said:

So could the new Rapier Saffire bass be an alternative to the Squier Rascal?

It looks great I wonder how it sounds?

 

https://bassmusicianmagazine.com/2023/08/new-gear-rapier-saffire-bass-2/

I just received the Saffire bass ( in the States ) the other day and they are totally and tonally different basses, which is a good thing as it means more basses!  I made the mistake of not purchasing the FENDER Rascal bass when it originally came out and ended up buying one used about half a year ago at an inflated cost as there weren't many produced. I also bought the Squire Rascal when it came out for fear of supply and demand - is this a trend? The quality is amazing considering the price. Regarding the Saffire it arrived a little damaged. The strap button near the bridge was pushed in about 2 -3 mm into the body with a hole 10mm wide.  Apparently someone dropped the box too hard on its end and foam in the box isn't dense enough to protect it. I would suggest JHS improve that as there may be more arriving like that. The body wood must be really soft for this to happen as many a basses have slipped thought the hands and hit the ground hard. Also someone must have used a cleaver to cut the nut for the E string.  I've attached a few photos.   Cheers.

20230828_184420.jpg

20230827_221505.jpg

20230826_080934.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rwillett Mentor

rwillett

Posted
Posted

It’s always good to check out as many basses as you can. It’s a sign of an organised and inquisitive mind. Even though you might have a small number of basses (perhaps less than 25), one more might just provide that extra oomph or subtle tone that you’ve been looking for. At least that’s my rationale and I only have four. 

 

I have to say the Mustang might be good enough for anything I might ever do, but that doesn’t stop me looking and testing and checking the credit card “just-in-case”. 

 

I’m lucky that I live an hour each way from my local music shops Promenade Music in Morecombe. If I still lived in London, I’d probably be bankrupt. I can’t even play that well but you know how it is….

 

Rob

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
scrumpymike Veteran

scrumpymike

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, dAs said:

I just received the Saffire bass ( in the States ) the other day and they are totally and tonally different basses, which is a good thing as it means more basses!

 

I already have the Fender Rascal (albeit now re-bodied a-la P Lyte) so your comparison pic helps me relate to the Saffire.

 

Can you explain the tonal differences between the three basses?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
msb Mentor

msb

Posted
Posted

I remember looking at the original Rascal , it didn’t feel like a short scale with the bridge set so far into the body. I was fine with the Bass VI so I regret not picking it up now. I was always a Dano fan. The lipsticks were a bonus.

They’ve become quite sought after because of the limited run they had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dAs Newbie

dAs

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, msb said:

I remember looking at the original Rascal , it didn’t feel like a short scale with the bridge set so far into the body. I was fine with the Bass VI so I regret not picking it up now. I was always a Dano fan. The lipsticks were a bonus.

They’ve become quite sought after because of the limited run they had. 

What's funny is that with all the pickup combinations.  Neck, Neck+Middle, Middle, Middle+Bridge, Bridge, Neck+Bridge, Neck+Middle+Bridge  I like just the Middle.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
scrumpymike Veteran

scrumpymike

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, dAs said:

What's funny is that with all the pickup combinations.  Neck, Neck+Middle, Middle, Middle+Bridge, Bridge, Neck+Bridge, Neck+Middle+Bridge  I like just the Middle.  

I like that middle pickup setting too but the only one of the 7 settings I don't use in our classic rock covers set is bridge only. The switching versatility is what I love most about the Fender Rascal. This is how my re-bodied Rascal looks now.

 

f6prprQl.jpg

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnDaBass Veteran

JohnDaBass

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, scrumpymike said:

I like that middle pickup setting too but the only one of the 7 settings I don't use in our classic rock covers set is bridge only. The switching versatility is what I love most about the Fender Rascal. This is how my re-bodied Rascal looks now.

 

f6prprQl.jpg

That's wonderful remodel which is not only unique but beautiful to behold. Is the middle Pup 10 inches from the 12th fret by any chance?

It just seems to me that 10ins appears to be the sweet spot on short scale (30ins) basses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
scrumpymike Veteran

scrumpymike

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, JohnDaBass said:

Is the middle Pup 10 inches from the 12th fret by any chance?

It just seems to me that 10ins appears to be the sweet spot on short scale (30ins) basses.

 

That's exactly right! And it's 10ins to the pickup split line on the old Encore s-s P I use for noodling around on at home.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NHM Proficient

NHM

Posted
Posted

That's interesting, the distance of the pup from the 12th fret. I've just measured my Gibson Les Paul Tribute which is also 10". My Musicmaster is 9.5", although I'd say that's as sweet a spot as you could imagine, just a tad darker in sound than the Gibson...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Baloney Balderdash Grand Master

Baloney Balderdash

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Indeed interesting.

 

Just measured the reverse split P pickup on my Ibanez Mikro Bass.

 

But since the Mikro Bass is just 28.6" scale length, and since 10" would be 1/3 of a 30" scale length bass, the equivalent measurement for the Mikro Bass, 1/3 X 28.6", would be ~9.5".

 

And the middle of bass side of the reverse split P pickup pole pieces turns out to be at just about 9.6" measured form the 12th fret, while the treble side is at just about 8.3".

 

So really close as well.

 

 

Edited by Baloney Balderdash
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnDaBass Veteran

JohnDaBass

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, NHM said:

That's interesting, the distance of the pup from the 12th fret. I've just measured my Gibson Les Paul Tribute which is also 10". My Musicmaster is 9.5", although I'd say that's as sweet a spot as you could imagine, just a tad darker in sound than the Gibson...

Well it's been said before and it will probably said again, " You can't beat 10 inches Vicar" 🤣🤣🤣

But seriously , 10 ins does seem to be the norm on a number of 30 ins scale basses, like you my Gibson Les Paul Tribute, new Fender Mike Kerr Tiggar/Barbie bass, G&L Fallout Tribute, one Pup on my Epiphone Rumblecat, and now also on my modded Guild/DeArmond Jet Star bass.

Edited by JohnDaBass
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnDaBass Veteran

JohnDaBass

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, Dazed said:

First time I’ve noticed this model, looks good, sounds good on the videos too. Bit pricey though @£1499

 

Sandberg Florence

 

IMG_3523.thumb.png.c354dd98ed5a656c4f40e5c017127351.png

 

 

Agreed, there are some really positive reviews and videos. It sounds great and if my quest for a worn Cherry Gibson Les Paul Tribute fails then the mahogany will be on my radar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...