JohnFitzgerald Posted September 1, 2012 Posted September 1, 2012 Some pics of the time when I had these lovelys. Anyone think they might have one of them now ? They were repsectively, an S1 bolted on headed, a series 3000 bolt on headless with side LEDs and a Groove 5 string in sunburst. Pics hopefully attached. Anyone spotted them around ? I have long since domesticated their value for such fripperies as annual holidays, car repairs and the like. Here we go. [attachment=117161:251418_452400791457920_813642543_n.jpg] [attachment=117162:Series 3000.jpg] [attachment=117163:Groove 5 string.jpg] Quote
Inga Posted yesterday at 18:00 Posted yesterday at 18:00 I'm saw I saw one of those not long ago but I can't remember where I saw it but I'm really sure I saw one Quote
spongebob Posted yesterday at 18:07 Posted yesterday at 18:07 13 years for an answer! Bravo! 👏 1 Quote
tauzero Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 7 hours ago, spongebob said: 13 years for an answer! Bravo! 👏 Inga is going for the title of Monarch of the Zombies. 1 Quote
Mrbigstuff Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago These days you can probably put the pics in AI and it will be able to scour the internet and find potential matches Quote
Joe Nation Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago The plural of Status is Statuses. A group of Statuses is called a reputation. 3 Quote
LukeFRC Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Joe Nation said: The plural of Status is Statuses. A group of Statuses is called a reputation. yet the old forum of Status owners used to collectively call them Statii - but what do they know eh? 1 Quote
Hellzero Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Funnily, in Latin, the plural form of status is still ... status, in the nominative form and it can never become statii, which doesn't exist. But what do they know, indeed. 🤔🤪 Quote
LukeFRC Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Hellzero said: Funnily, in Latin, the plural form of status is still ... status, in the nominative form and it can never become statii, which doesn't exist. But what do they know, indeed. 🤔🤪 status: factum in Camulodunum 1 Quote
Hellzero Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago In fact, it would be better and more accurate so, as Colchester must be declined in the genitive and factum rejected at the end: Status : Camuloduni factum. Latin and Greek classical studies leave deep scars... Quote
police squad Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 hours ago, Hellzero said: Funnily, in Latin, the plural form of status is still ... status, in the nominative form and it can never become statii, which doesn't exist. But what do they know, indeed. 🤔🤪 I studied latin for a few years and the 2nd declension, nominative plural does end in I. So Servus (which means slave) becomes Servi But Status is actually a name, so maybe it's different Quote
Hellzero Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago And even if you were using the word status instead of the name, it belongs to the fourth declension, so nominative plural is still status and statii still doesn't exist in this declension. 😉 Quote
snorkie635 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 4 hours ago, Hellzero said: In fact, it would be better and more accurate so, as Colchester must be declined in the genitive and factum rejected at the end: Status : Camuloduni factum. Latin and Greek classical studies leave deep scars... You could probably still take out a private prosecution against that teacher you know. (Just sayin') Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.