Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

Some pics of the time when I had these lovelys.

Anyone think they might have one of them now ?

They were repsectively, an S1 bolted on headed, a series 3000 bolt on headless with side LEDs and a Groove 5 string in sunburst. Pics hopefully attached.

Anyone spotted them around ?

I have long since domesticated their value for such fripperies as annual holidays, car repairs and the like.

Here we go.

[attachment=117161:251418_452400791457920_813642543_n.jpg]

[attachment=117162:Series 3000.jpg]

[attachment=117163:Groove 5 string.jpg]

  • 13 years later...
Posted
15 minutes ago, Joe Nation said:

The plural of Status is Statuses. A group of Statuses is called a reputation.

yet the old forum of Status owners used to collectively call them Statii - but what do they know eh?

  • Haha 1
Posted

Funnily, in Latin, the plural form of status is still ... status, in the nominative form and it can never become statii, which doesn't exist.

 

But what do they know, indeed. 🤔🤪

Posted
8 minutes ago, Hellzero said:

Funnily, in Latin, the plural form of status is still ... status, in the nominative form and it can never become statii, which doesn't exist.

 

But what do they know, indeed. 🤔🤪

status: factum in Camulodunum

  • Thanks 1
Posted

In fact, it would be better and more accurate so, as Colchester must be declined in the genitive and factum rejected at the end:

 

Status : Camuloduni factum.

 

Latin and Greek classical studies leave deep scars...

Posted
2 hours ago, Hellzero said:

Funnily, in Latin, the plural form of status is still ... status, in the nominative form and it can never become statii, which doesn't exist.

 

But what do they know, indeed. 🤔🤪

I studied latin for a few years and the 2nd declension, nominative plural does end in I. So Servus (which means slave) becomes Servi

But Status is actually a name, so maybe it's different

Posted

And even if you were using the word status instead of the name, it belongs to the fourth declension, so nominative plural is still status and statii still doesn't exist in this declension. 😉

Posted
4 hours ago, Hellzero said:

In fact, it would be better and more accurate so, as Colchester must be declined in the genitive and factum rejected at the end:

 

Status : Camuloduni factum.

 

Latin and Greek classical studies leave deep scars...

You could probably still take out a private prosecution against that teacher you know. (Just sayin')

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, snorkie635 said:

You could probably still take out a private prosecution against that teacher you know. (Just sayin')

Hélas, they are both dead now, but I still can prosecute their children ... isn't it.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Hellzero said:

Hélas, they are both dead now, but I still can prosecute their children ... isn't it.

They would use this thread as defence - that even though learning was hard it seemingly brought you great joy later in life 

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, police squad said:

I studied latin for a few years and the 2nd declension, nominative plural does end in I. So Servus (which means slave) becomes Servi

But Status is actually a name, so maybe it's different

 

Status is 4th declension, IIRC like manuus (hand).

 

Edit: And virus (fog or miasma).

 

Which reminds me, a rather ill-educated feminist I once met was all offended at the fact that handbooks were called "manuals".

Edited by tauzero

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...