JohnFitzgerald Posted September 1, 2012 Posted September 1, 2012 Some pics of the time when I had these lovelys. Anyone think they might have one of them now ? They were repsectively, an S1 bolted on headed, a series 3000 bolt on headless with side LEDs and a Groove 5 string in sunburst. Pics hopefully attached. Anyone spotted them around ? I have long since domesticated their value for such fripperies as annual holidays, car repairs and the like. Here we go. [attachment=117161:251418_452400791457920_813642543_n.jpg] [attachment=117162:Series 3000.jpg] [attachment=117163:Groove 5 string.jpg] Quote
Inga Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago I'm saw I saw one of those not long ago but I can't remember where I saw it but I'm really sure I saw one Quote
tauzero Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 7 hours ago, spongebob said: 13 years for an answer! Bravo! 👏 Inga is going for the title of Monarch of the Zombies. 1 Quote
Mrbigstuff Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago These days you can probably put the pics in AI and it will be able to scour the internet and find potential matches Quote
Joe Nation Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago The plural of Status is Statuses. A group of Statuses is called a reputation. 2 Quote
LukeFRC Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Joe Nation said: The plural of Status is Statuses. A group of Statuses is called a reputation. yet the old forum of Status owners used to collectively call them Statii - but what do they know eh? 1 Quote
Hellzero Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Funnily, in Latin, the plural form of status is still ... status, in the nominative form and it can never become statii, which doesn't exist. But what do they know, indeed. 🤔🤪 Quote
LukeFRC Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Hellzero said: Funnily, in Latin, the plural form of status is still ... status, in the nominative form and it can never become statii, which doesn't exist. But what do they know, indeed. 🤔🤪 status: factum in Camulodunum 1 Quote
Hellzero Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago In fact, it would be better and more accurate so, as Colchester must be declined in the genitive and factum rejected at the end: Status : Camuloduni factum. Latin and Greek classical studies leave deep scars... Quote
police squad Posted 34 minutes ago Posted 34 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Hellzero said: Funnily, in Latin, the plural form of status is still ... status, in the nominative form and it can never become statii, which doesn't exist. But what do they know, indeed. 🤔🤪 I studied latin for a few years and the 2nd declension, nominative plural does end in I. So Servus (which means slave) becomes Servi But Status is actually a name, so maybe it's different Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.