Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Chris2112

Member
  • Posts

    4,537
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chris2112

  1. [quote name='Musicman20' post='1241314' date='May 23 2011, 10:55 AM']I think the prices are part of why I gave up on the Metros. A few years back, they were reasonable, but still expensive. Now, they are almost £2000, or more.[/quote] I'm sure when Guitar Guitar first got them in they were about £1200. And even then, they wern't very good!
  2. They are the greatest basses! Absolutely unique, and they sound incredible. I'll be quite happy to keep it if the right fretless bass doesn't come along. That said, I based my decision partly on whats easier to replace. I'd certainly find it easier to find another Kubicki bass than replace my ACG - simply because my ACG is one of kind! As I've said, I'm playing less than ever now, maybe a few hours a week. I'd like a nice fretless. I've been there and traded away a Kubicki before. I regretted losing that first Kubicki, but it also got me a Status Stealth bass to play with. And you only live once, so I might as well try a few basses along the way! I might not be explaining too clearly exactly why I'm willing to trade away a bass I love and am attached to but you never know what is waiting round the corner.
  3. Well, this is a bit of a tough one to offer up. I've been thinking of getting myself a fretless bass. I was all set to pull the trigger on a fretless ACG when I ran into some car trouble. I wasn't sure how much it would cost to fix (in the end, nothing thankfully. I can now tell you a lot about the Magnetti Marelli electronic throttle module from a Volvo S60 though!). This put my finances on freeze. I've spent a lot of money this year and I want to take the wife away as she deserves a holiday too, so thats something else to tie up disposable income! I decided at the Rush show last night that one of my fretted basses had to go and I had to get myself a fretless bass. It was a toss up between my two fretted basses, my ACG Harlot S type and my Kubicki Ex Factor. I've had two now and I've been very lucky to own them, as they are awesome basses. I've had the Kubicki longer than the ACG too, though really I'd like to hold onto the ACG forever! Anyway, this particular Kubicki is serial number #1659 built in August 1989. I have previously owned #1777 too. Anyway, this one is a 'cross over' model made after Fender had bought Kubicki but before they changed the model parts. It has the Fender Custom Shop logo silk screened onto the back of the headstock, but it comes with the original 18V electronics and the 6 position preamp. For those who aren't familiar with these basses, they were made in California by Philip Kubicki. Philip used to work for Fender R&D and designed a headless bass for them in the 70's before setting up his own company. The Ex Factor has been his only bass creation, simply because it's excellent and has always been a hit. It's kept him in business from when it was first made until he retired! Aside from the Key Factor bass of course, which is a simplified Ex Factor. Anyway, the bass is 32" scale with the D-Clip detuner which extends the E string to 36" scale and opens up two more frets and detunes the string to D - a far more elegant solution than a Hipshot detuner. The preamp is the 6 position version (before Fender changed it for a 9V preamp). It has two active modes and three passive models with bass and treble controls alongside the volume and pan controls. The board is made of ebony and is radiused, a radius which is also evident in the pickups to allow for very low action with an even, clean feel across the board. The pickups also have 'pop cuts' small indentations on the top edge to create room for popping. The bass takes normal strings, with the ball end anchoring in the headstock and the other end being threaded through the bridge. The body is made of maple and the neck is also maple, namely 36 laminates for superior strength and stability. It truely is a great neck. Of the two Kubicki basses I have owned, this is the better one. It's in better condition and sounds a little brighter and more poppy. On the downside, the bass has a couple of small dings in the finish and the black paint at the bottom of the neck join on the body has worn slightly. It's also missing the original volume control which has been replaced with a chrome knob. it plays brilliantly and sounds excellent. Here are the only pictures I could find. I'll have to take some more, but in the meantime... [size=6]For sale £700 - Now sold thanks 07/08/2011[/size]
  4. Love these. I nearly purchased a 4 string headless model recently but it had a lot of damage that would be pretty much impossible to repair due to the nature of how these basses are made.
  5. [quote name='wateroftyne' post='1239942' date='May 22 2011, 07:24 AM']Yeah... for me, the first set was lacklustre in places. There was a run of five songs which tried my patience even as a dedicated fan... Stick It Out. Workin' Them Angels, Leave That Thing Alone, Faithless, BU2B... a strange choice of tunes, IMO. Subdivisions had a bit of a shonky start, didn't it? The 'Subdivisions!' voice was a bit out of sync... The second set was much better. Moving Pictures didn't use too much video. Witch Hunt was awesome (sorry, chris2112 ) Camera Eye was wierd, though.. where I was, no-one reacted when it started..? A great performance.[/quote] I thought Workin' Them Angels and Leave That Thing Alone were great. LTTA is about the only song worth listening to from Counterparts! So overall I thought both sets were great. Even with small fluffs like the Subdivisions intro being out of time, you can expect one small gaffe of that nature at every Rush show. I think they do it to show that they're human! But yes, the lack of response to the intro for The Camera Eye was disappointing. There are a lot of fair weather fans there I suspect who come to hear Limelight and Spirit of Radio. Completely avoiding the rest of the songs. One bloke said as I was leaving "I think a lot of Rush fans put up with listening to all kinds of sh*t so they can hear Limelight and the rest of the hits...". I rolled my eyes and thought "yeah, fans...". The Camera Eye was a standout moment for me, utterly awesome.
  6. [quote name='wateroftyne' post='1239698' date='May 21 2011, 08:56 PM']It was... Marathon is the highlight for me so far... No busy video screens, just music. The sound is cack, though. (yes... I got a ticket in the end :-) )[/quote] Marathon was great. My favourite song of the show, and I loved the way the lights matched the music. The white lights that shone as Geddy sang "Something always fires the light that gets in your eyes" were particularly impressive and really added impact to an amazing song. Hearing 'Presto' live was awesome too, what a fantastic song. At first I wasn't overly impressed with the show, 'Spirit of Radio' seemed a bit of a dull choice for an opener and I've heard it so many times now. I think they got off on the wrong foot, because 'Time Stand Still' was incredible. Alex was the man of the night for me, his playing was spot on, his tone was quite sharp and bright and he was full of energy, clearly having a blast. His solo on the 12 string was particularly beautiful. The sound wasn't the best but it was more than decent considering the fact the arena is a load of crap. Alex and Neil sounded great, but Geddy's bass seemed to get a little mushy. It's as though he was using two different tone settings, because on 'Leave That Thing Alone' he sounded really clear and present with loads of growl, but at other times that was lacking. As has been said, in some of the heavier parts the bass didn't sound great. Still, his playing was great. There were a couple of duff tracks that could have been left at the door, things like 'Stick it out' and 'Witch hunt' were pretty dull and could have been replaced with a few more Hold Your Fire of Power Windows tracks. Interestingly, there was nothing from Grace Under Pressure, Test For Echo, Roll The Bones or Vapor Trails as far as I can remember. That said, most of the tracks were excellent and the standards were nicely balanced with more interesting tunes. 'The Camera Eye' was a particularly awesome song, and 'Vital Signs' took me by surprise as I had forgotten how good a song it is! Overall, it was a great show. The video segments are excellent ("Girls, can you stop those Moving Pitchers"). The guys are obviously still having a blast and they are still the best band of all time. I'd place the show on par with the Snakes and Arrows show, even if the sound mix wasn't as good. Still a great show and easily worth the asking price when you consider how long they play for.
  7. Just at the Newcastle show now, its vert good. Marathon was awesome.
  8. [quote name='AttitudeCastle' post='1239413' date='May 21 2011, 03:55 PM']I really liked the JM2s they sounded monsterous too![/quote] I thought they were lazy and cheap and sounded crap. YMMV.
  9. The first generation ones were much better than the lazy second generation effort.
  10. That is very cool.
  11. [quote name='tauzero' post='1229494' date='May 12 2011, 11:46 PM'][url="http://www.lordonly.net/lojtbas3.htm"]Lord Only[/url] - John Turner. Having listened to a few minutes only, ISTR I wasn't very impressed - I can't play any stuff off their website now (IE or FF, so I think it's their website that's knackered). The bass is by Conklin.[/quote] Yes, the website does look kaput. I did listen to the band years ago through some Talkbass posts and they were dreadful. Mind you, the pretentious, Dream Theater wannabe slop they were playing is probably the most appropriate place for an instrument as tragically comic and pretentious as a 7 string double neck! I should state that I think 7 strings are pretty cool, but in this instance they look incredibly naff.
  12. [quote name='Waldo' post='1228957' date='May 12 2011, 03:57 PM']Absolute guff. On a par with this monstrosity: [/quote] You couldn't look much more like a bellend if you tried. Charles Bronson sunglasses, playing a comedy bass indoors? If he'd known the touch of a woman he'd put that down and have a word with himself.
  13. What a waste of web space.
  14. [quote name='thisnameistaken' post='1227973' date='May 11 2011, 08:15 PM']Nah. He's on Talkbass a lot and he comes across as a MASSIVE bell end.[/quote] True. He doesn't come across well at all, usually turning up, making comments like a buffoon and then being bailed out by moderators. Of course, Talkbass wouldn't want anyone expressing an opinion that might upset a professional bass player (even one who only ever turns up at trade shows doing crap solo bass stuff like this guy) as they're busy paying lip service to artists and manufacturers in the hope of securing funding.
  15. You could at least crack a smile!
  16. Probably Stuart Hamm, I'd just throw him my Kubicki and sit and watch him play it for an hour. That would be awesome!
  17. I've had two Classic Vibe jazz basses (both sold on) and they were both great basses. I'm not a precision man so I couldn't comment on them. I think those Su Pollard basses have stole the 'cheap bass thunder', but there is nothing that can compete with a Classic Vibe jazz bass at the price point. Even the Vintage Modified jazz basses don't stack up (and I've owned them too!).
  18. [quote name='Conan' post='1226085' date='May 10 2011, 12:47 PM']Having said that I don't like bass solos - I do like it when the bass carries the melodic part, like in this example. Very tasteful IMO... Listen at 1:52 and 3:00. [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGRx5Ja2stc&feature=BFa&list=AVGxdCwVVULXfzyq-NVsKIiWotM4xKpCnk&index=7"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGRx5Ja2stc...Cnk&index=7[/url][/quote] That was pretty cool. I love the song "Dara Factor One" by Weather Report. It's got some amazing bass playing in it. Jaco never solos but plays the most amazing melodic lines, woven around everything else. He is so on the button on this track, quite simply a masterclass in this odd style of playing. The little run he starts at 02:49 and finishes at 02:55 might be the best six seconds of bass playing around. How anyone can get a handful of notes to sound so amazing is beyond me. [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAnkS3-AJRA"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAnkS3-AJRA[/url]
  19. I've done a few in my time. Graceland by Paul Simon, Hold Your Fire by Rush etc etc. Only the good ones!
  20. I'm planning on getting the payment in for a fretless ACG in the next couple of days, a custom built bass for me to mess around one. I used to love a bit of fretless playing but I got rid of my Alembic as I still didn't really love having 5 strings. I also like having lines, although having had a few fretless basses without lines over the years it's not a 'must' for me but I do find they are useful, especially when playing on the faster tunes. My new fretless bass will have a piezo bridge and a single magnetic pickup in the bridge position for that awesome burpy sound.
  21. Great basses for not a lot of money. I used to GAS like crazy for them, nearly bought one last year before deciding I'll never be a 5 string player!
  22. I'd probably grab my ACG Harlot S Type, but I'd be heartbroken about the Kubicki I'd be leaving behind. And the Ashdown MK500!
  23. [quote name='eude' post='1219559' date='May 4 2011, 09:53 AM']Another thing to note, the Gallus body shape always looks kinda big in photos, but in the flesh it is actually very very compact and all kinds of loverly [/quote] Alan surely must be the master of packaging. When I bought my Harlot, I had only seen pictures of it online. I thought the body looked fairly large but everything else about it excited me so I decided to buy it. When I actually saw it in person I was taken aback by how small and compact the body is, and how well it balanced. As a lover of basses with small bodies, this was a real boon for me. So I can imagine you're quite right with this comment!
×
×
  • Create New...