Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Bassassin

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    7,844
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Bassassin

  1. Off the top of my head, I think original parts would've been DiMarzio Model P, Badass Mk 1 bridge and either Schaller M4S or Grover Titan tuners. If you go down the original or resto routes (which I probably would) then these parts shouldn't be too hard to find. Espcially on a forum full of bassists!
  2. [quote name='karlfer' timestamp='1497772245' post='3320420'] Bassassin (Jon) did this with one of his fakers. Wonder if he will sue for copywright [/quote] As I've said before - if they'd a mind, Hoshino Gakki (owner of the Ibanez brand) could have a field day with Johhny-Come-Lately Hall & his trumped-up claims of intellectual property and trade-dress registration. Fortunately they're more concerned with the business of designing and manufacturing good-quality, interesting, playable and affordable musical instruments to give much of a sh!t about what they were doing in 1971... Liking the new RIC colour scemes though - I'm a massive sucker for checked binding on a 4000 series bass, and if my black plate/bridge Frankenbugger had that, I might drop Ol' Johnny H an email! [url="http://s1276.photobucket.com/user/LanterneRouge/media/Rickenfakers/bugsampheads_zpstpqqsxfe.jpg.html"][/url] The pink one's fine, but I'm inclined to think if you're gonna do it, then do it properly: [url="http://s1276.photobucket.com/user/LanterneRouge/media/Rickenfakers/RV4_001_zps9yxr3eww.jpg.html"][/url] And while you're at it, bin that ugly afterthought scratchplate design and the pointless guitar controls too.
  3. [quote name='mcnach' timestamp='1497602900' post='3319358'] As long as it's legit, and it shows, their CEO won't bother anybody about it. EBay and Gumtree, and other places, are absolutely fine. [/quote] John Hall is on record saying that if he could prevent the sale of secondhand original Rickenbackers, then he would. Deluded megalomaniac fantasist he might be, but for him it's all about his bank account's bottom line. Has anyone mentioned RIC's interesting warranty? Which starts not when you buy the bass, but when it leaves the factory?
  4. That Wilkes has been a beautiful bass, and could be again, with some tlc and a pro refret. Would like to hope someone here will get it & bring it back to life.
  5. Here's an idea. Don't buy a Rick. Buy a good condition 70s MIJ copy and get everything that's cool about a Rickenbacker with none of the downsides: A truss rod that works! A finish that doesn't change colour and fall off! No association with John Hall! And all for less than 25% of the price of a new 4003. I'd recommend the Shaftesbury branded copy - still lots of them around, very robust and accurate (some MIJ basses were neither!) and pretty much indistinguishable from the real deal. And if you don't like it, you'll get your money back, no bother. Just don't go thinking you can buy one on here...
  6. Now that's pretty epic! Unfortunately a bit too rich for me (and I'm trying to downsize!) but GLWTS. Should point out these were made by Fujigen Gakki, as were all 70s/80s MIJ Ibanez. The confusion with Terada stems from a longstanding error on the GuitarDater website.
  7. Not sure why you think this is a Suzuki. I'd be inclined to think that if Tokai Gakki have confirmed that it's a specific Tokai model, then that's likely to be exactly what it is. I'm very, very familiar with copy-era MIJ instruments, and to be honest your bass has nothing more than a passing & coincidental resemblance to the two Suzuki-branded instruments linked in the thread. I'm no particular Tokai expert so maybe someone else can confirm exactly what it is - but I think it's a lot more likely to be a Tokai than anything else.
  8. [quote name='Skybone' timestamp='1496871758' post='3314482'] Or is that a capital "I"? Ibanez serial numbers at the time are Month Letter then Year then 4 digit serial no., so that would make it September 1978, No. 6932. [/quote] Ha!
  9. [quote name='Happy Jack' timestamp='1496869340' post='3314457'] s/n 1786932 and a gold Made In Japan sticker just beneath. [/quote] That'll be I (the letter) 786932. Meaning your bass was the 6932nd instrument produced at Fujigen Gakki in September 1978. Probably one of the last ones.
  10. [quote name='Beer of the Bass' timestamp='1496856778' post='3314345'] I wonder which model the Ibanez I had in my teens was? It was through-neck and had the fake mudbucker, but the inlays were greyish and not sparkly. [/quote] Maybe some sort of transitional 2388B/DX - I've seen pics of examples with mix & match pickups, probably just using up stocks of parts. Ta for the pic Bluejay - Jack's looks like a late-ish 2388B/DX - does it have a serial number on the headstock? Interesting that it doesn't seem to have the 1" pickup spacing I mentioned - not seen one like this before.
  11. [quote name='Happy Jack' timestamp='1496838813' post='3314192'] So if mine is a 1970s Ibanez with a sort-of Toaster pickup and a through neck, does that make it a 2338? And is a 2338b the same but with a bolt-on neck? [/quote] In Ibanez-speak, 2388 is the model number & sort-of defines the "range" - a plain 2388 is a guitar, copy of a Rick 480. Therefore, a 2388B is the bass "version", and yours, being a through-neck, is a 2388B/DX! Simple! The 2388B changed quite a bit over its life, early ones having big Gibson-type pickups (presumably because there weren't any Hi-Gain & Toaster copies at the time) and full-width sparkly inlays like 60s/early 70s 4001s. Later ones had small inlays & replica pickups, and even had the 1" pickup gap like later 4001s, which I don't think any other MIJ copy did. All of them kept the checked binding though. Have you posted any pics?
  12. [quote name='Number6' timestamp='1496790315' post='3313928'] How does the quality of current Chi-Fakers compare to the 70s/80s Japanese ones? [/quote] I think many of them seem to be decent enough quality but as far as accuracy's concerned, they're not that close. The MIJ instruments were often built to replica standard, with identical hardware, very closely copied pickups and the correct scale & neck dimensions - there's not a single modern copy that does any of this. This is an interesting head-to-head between a Chicky & a real 4003 - the Chinabacker comes out surprisingly well: [media]http://youtu.be/EiP_yqMtL_A[/media]
  13. The frets look like they've been levelled but not re-crowned. Bit lazy, & that will affect the intonation slightly.
  14. Bizarre decision to list it as a BIN - anyone see this similarly listed Ibanez MC924 Musician? [url="http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/222527120318"]http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/222527120318[/url] Seller plainly has no idea what it is, but put it on as a no-reserve auction. I think they'll be pleasantly surprised by the result.
  15. Bloody hell - never spotted that, I'm assuming it wasn't up for long! Don't know too much about these but I'd guess that's about 1/4 of its value!
  16. [quote name='Skybone' timestamp='1496438138' post='3311523'] Wasn't Westminster a Matsumoku brand? [/quote] I think so - the few Westminsters I've seen have been Mats, and I've read that it was a Matsumoku domestic market house-brand. Might turn out not to be, though!
  17. [quote name='prowla' timestamp='1496085875' post='3308691'] Westminster. [/quote] Now that's a possibility I didn't think of - Westminster was a Japanese domestic brand but small quantities could've been imported privately. I thnk that's how Grecos got sold outside Japan.
  18. It does look to me like a generic P copy with a slightly differently shaped scratchplate & headstock. But as with all unidentified instruments, working out anything at all about it depends predominantly on clear and detailed pictures. Really can't tell much from this, beyond what I've just said!
  19. I have a bass listed at the moment - using their handy-dandy fee calculator app, it's still 10%. Hard to avoid the temptation of loading the BIN to reflect that.
  20. [quote name='pete.young' timestamp='1495965291' post='3307767'] On the other hand, he did play on this: [/quote] I didn't know he played on that! Met Jayne/Wayne County a few years back. I was in a band with a trans guitarist/vocalist at the time, Jayne seemed to feel a bit threatened, which was a shame.
  21. The seemingly intentional exclusion of particular musical genres is the only gripe I have about the show. As I've mentioned before, while there's seldom (pretty much never) anything that's "my" sort of music, I always find a lot to enjoy and it exposes me to a lot of good music I would otherwise not encounter. I even quite like Jools, obsequious little tit that he is. Could do without his rinky-dink piano antics, though. Re: metal - Metallica have been on twice. And... err... that's it.
  22. [quote name='pete.young' timestamp='1495884025' post='3307315'] Jools is from the punk era. Sniffy contempt was the absolute minimum reaction to prog rock about that time. [/quote] Jools/Squeeze were about as punk as Boyzone, but that's what I mean. You'd think that 40+ years on, he'd have worked out that 99% of that attitude was just Malcolm McLaren-esque posturing. Other than being a Guild, no idea what bass Sheryl was playing. Ugly as sin & sounded horrible. The bass, I mean...
  23. [quote name='KevB' timestamp='1495829818' post='3306981'] Why do you reckon though Jon? [/quote] Aside from perhaps a sort of stuck-in-1979 sniffy contempt for the genre, I genuinely have no idea.
  24. [quote name='throwoff' timestamp='1495794168' post='3306628'] Does the swear checker really get triggered by sw***y? Edit - Blimey! It does! [/quote] It's gonna hate w***el Rotary Engine, then.
  25. [quote name='KevB' timestamp='1495620132' post='3305297'] Why he's not had an act like Big Big Train on by now completely mystifies me. [/quote] Because you can count the number of prog artists that have been on Jools on the fingers of one stump.
×
×
  • Create New...