Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

prowla

Member
  • Posts

    4,127
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by prowla

  1. It looks interesting from a distance, but on closer inspection... https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/TRADES-WELCOME-Explorer-Bass-Guitar-4-String/383602930023
  2. hey, hey, hey...
  3. Nice wood you've got there, sir!
  4. I've got 3 faker projects on the go: This one is going to just be a fairly generic Ric-a-like. This one's going to be brass everywhere. And this one's got an extra string.
  5. The only thing good about that bass is it's not mine!
  6. His other bass is kinda cool... https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Custom-explorer-Bass-Guitar/124239355141
  7. The FI is a different generation (ha-ha!) of synth, IMHO.
  8. I've got a mains powered handheld Dremel and I've never thought I made a mistake buying it. The only issue I have is in finding bits for it. I'm about to do some routing for a bridge, but I'm not sure the Dremel is going to be appropriate for that.
  9. The SS (Super Synth) is a very good pedal; very responsive. The only issue is that it only has 10 synth memories. You can program it via a PC app.
  10. Attack, Decay, Sustain, Release.
  11. Always making waves, eh...
  12. I think I'll bypass it...
  13. Technically it is correct - there are some missing knobs... ...and it is advertised as "For parts or not working".
  14. That's a cracking neck! (...gets coat...)
  15. Yes - I work in IT and am always having to think about whether the 1st item in an array or character of a string is at "0" or "1"; from my 80s C programming, it should (of course) be 0, but you can never be sure and there's always someone out to get you!
  16. Yes - I would agree that most folks wouldn't connect a MIDI controller to the FI, and so would never encounter any issue. In my case, I just wanted something to allow me to enter the channel number without embellishment - what a foolish notion! I really didn't want another programmable unit to configure as I've just plain got too many of them in my life - just wanted something simple! If I were to go for a programmable controller, I might consider a Keith McMillen SoftStep, as I already have a 12-Step and a QNexus; of course, now I have to confirm it does the 0-127/1-128 convention as required...
  17. Yes, the PK-5A has a Prog button and the pedals C-whatever are 09, with A being Enter. Neither the pedals nor the Minitaur display the channel, so there's no visual issue there.
  18. I haven't tried it with my Minitaur, because it would have no function there; I have a PK-5A bass pedal unit for that and the Minitaur lives in a rack unit which is all set in place.
  19. Echo that, and I hope that nothing I have said here (other than in expressing thanks) could be construed as directed against you personally! 🙂
  20. Yes - Andras; that was specifically relating to your correction (noted) that the FB site is not the manufacturer's support site, but rather an enthusiast's site, and he posted there as a company representative.
  21. I have raised the issue with Tech21 also; they may not be going to respond out of business hours. The unit itself is a sealed unit and I don't know if it is programmable; it's presented as a black box. I suspect any fix they come up with would be in the release of a new product, rather than an update to the existing one. Maybe I'm just unlucky in having chosen a product which introduces this interoperability issue; hence my suggestion of mentioning in the manual. Whether you should phrase it as "as it should", or in more neutral terms is something to consider; the MIDIBUDDY MP128 unit I have states this in its manual: That seems fairly neutral. As to the code space; yes, I appreciate that; hence I have made an enhancement request (not a demand!). 🙂 Of course, companies will choose and prioritise what should be included in development(s).
  22. Excuse me - from the manufacturer's representative, then. And there you have it - the "not my problem" position. The arguments as to whether it is "right" or "wrong" are not the point; the real-world fact is that companies produce kit with different interpretation. And some companies have a setting so they will support either. The question is whether the respective companies consider it important enough to address. A product which can handle both conventions is plainly more flexible and compatible with other units.
  23. Assuming that "deal with it" doesn't just mean go away and shut up, I have: Made (constructive) recommendations that the manual be updated to highlight the issue. Requested that the product might be enhanced to add support for both forms of PC number formats: 0-127/1-128. I do understand the underlying numbers and, for what it's worth, appreciate that 0-127 is "correct" from a programming point of view, as it is 7 bits of data. However, we are in a world where some companies have taken it upon themselves to say that people can't handle having the 1st item be number zero, and so-on, so they've chosen to present them as 1, etc. As a mitigation against that, some companies allow a 0-127/1-128 option, for instance another MIDI switch I have, the MIDIBUDDY MP128 has a DIP switch on the back panel. (But unfortunately, I wanted something more compact.) I think that requesting a feature enhancement that the FI firmware has a similar capability is perfectly reasonable. If every piece of kit, including controllers, modules, software had such a switch, then it would become a non-issue. Of course, in DAWs and suchlike, it may not be important, as you'll probably label them anyway by the song or some description of the sound. And that also applies to a programmable hardware switch unit, where you have a text display. Unfortunately, the hardware switcher is a non-programmable sealed unit, so it can't be changed. However, the FI firmware presumably could.
  24. @Quatschmacher Yes, I hadn't realised that you were working on a volunteer basis and I do appreciate the effort you put in. However, you did say: And on the manufacturers support page I got the response: Which are what prompted me to say: and: Of course, none of those comments are directed at anybody personally, but at the words posted.
×
×
  • Create New...