Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Owen

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    7,742
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Owen

  1. It is a beautifully realised piece.
  2. Dat grain tho!
  3. Not much gives me GAS these days.........
  4. Do we still not know what it is yet?
  5. That is very lovely.
  6. Yeah, me too. But there has to be a market for it. Not me obviously. To me, Ritter's aesthetic sensibilities (curves, lines and proportions) are just fabulous. I have owned one (along with one of mostly everything else) of his more standard shapes and it was lovely. But the Isabella line is new, classy, not trying too hard and is floating my boat.
  7. Honza has it going on. As usual.
  8. Good old Jens, he does less is more and more is more!
  9. If money was not object I would have one tomorrow. However.............
  10. Ooooofff!
  11. This is it. The moment we have been waiting for. I shall celebrate by mounting it in it's new enclosure.
  12. Of course, the other answer is "don't worry about the changes, we'll busk it".
  13. I read the whole thread hoping to find that answer.
  14. This with QSC K10 as a modular rig would be an awful lot of fun. 10" for rehearsals and small gigs and then add the sub for THUNDER O'CLOCK!
  15. Note to self - "buy more clamps'.
  16. Nothing else does what this does. For those of you who are umfamiliar with it, I shall dig out my pedalboard and wow you with some synthy bonkers chopping.
  17. I have never enjoyed speakers as much as the two sets of ATCs I have been around in my life. I will not be buying these, not because I don't want to, but because life. Here is a link to a review of them if you have not run into these before https://www.whathifi.com/reviews/atc-scm50
  18. At least that means you are not carrying the PA system and rigging/running it. FWIW I depped with a band last night and sold them my A&H stuff. So I no longer have a vested interest. And I still think the OP should go digital.
  19. SRM450 are nice and beefy. I found mine to be slightly shouty in the hi-mid when pushed hard, but a little eq on the main send of a digital desk tamed that nicely. Digital desks are the bomb. You can also (depending on desk - if I were to need it I would not sell my A&H) eq all the mud out of each and every monitor send just to clean up your onstage sound. In analogue desk world that is a rack of EQ + inset leads + set up time + transport space and weight. Super duper moulded in ears are lovely ( I am sure) but you can in ear remarkably well with a decent pair of ear buds , a multi channel headphone amp and headphone extension leads. Then you do not need to carry wedges. Then you have a much quieter stage. Then you have a better FOH sound and less setup time and transport space and weight. I am quite enthusiastic about all this - I cannot think of a single reason to use an analogue desk. There is a reason that their 2nd hand value is through the floor.
  20. He is the bomb.
  21. To all the cabs I've loved before.............
  22. For clarity, I am selling so I would be all enthusiastic about them However, I cannot think of a single reason to use a powered mixer and passive speakers these days. Newer active speakers are not super heavy and the digital desks do SO MUCH more than analogue ones ever could. Onboard compression for each channel. More FX than anyone knows what to do with. Programme a mix per song. Give everyone control over their own monitor mixes. Multitrack the gig. Huge EQ possibilities, both on channels and on each output. The list goes on and on. For good measure, I would buy a Yamaha EAD10 to mic the drums. Expensive, but a set of drum mics will be £200 minimum, add cables, stands and a larger multicore to the mix then it starts to pay it's way. And of course there is the drummer setting up all their audio instead of sound bod doing it. Win/Win.
  23. Like, totally
  24. Challenge accepted!
×
×
  • Create New...