[quote name='spinynorman' post='719114' date='Jan 20 2010, 03:19 PM']Oddly, that isn't quite as funny as some of the real audiophile sites. These people have gone beyond parody.
Things haven't changed much since the 1950s.
[url="http://members.optusnet.com.au/pennywyatt/Interests/FlandersSwann/DropOfaHat/At%20the%20Drop%20of%20a%20Hat02.html"]http://members.optusnet.com.au/pennywyatt/...0a%20Hat02.html[/url][/quote]
True, but at least in the 1950s, a lot more people understood what was going on inside the box, and a large proportion of hi-fi buffs actually built and modified their own gear, the cutting edge was new and devious ways to add a resistor here, change a coil there and properly tweak gear in search of better clarity, which was (on the whole) much needed in the earlier days. Thats how the term "High Fidelity" was coined, as most equipment back then was not capable of reproducing speech or music clearly enough for you to think you were in the room with them. Now, its all back to snake oil as even the hardened audiophiles just want to see pretty design, and be conned into buying stuff like those wooden sound cones and green CD pens.
+1 for the Flanders and Swann stuff, ahh, the old days